You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Ignite TC Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/03/13 15:43:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11535) AtomicLong cannot be found after creation

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16791822#comment-16791822 ] 

Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-11535:
----------------------------------------

{panel:title=--&gt; Run :: All: Possible Blockers|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1}
{color:#d04437}MVCC PDS 2{color} [[tests 0 TIMEOUT , Exit Code |https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=3305327]]

{panel}
[TeamCity *--&gt; Run :: All* Results|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=3304201&amp;buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]

> AtomicLong cannot be found after creation
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-11535
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11535
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.7
>            Reporter: Vyacheslav Koptilin
>            Assignee: Vyacheslav Koptilin
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.8
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> For now, IgniteAtomics use {{PartitionLossPolicy.IGNORE}}, which is the default value for all caches, (see {{DataStructuresProcessor#cacheConfiguration}}). Therefore, partition loss leads to the fact that information about IgniteAtomic may be lost as well. In that case, any operation with IgniteAtomic results in the following exception:
> {code}
> javax.cache.processor.EntryProcessorException: Failed to find atomic long: atomicLong
> {code}
> {code:java}
> Value: An error occurred while calling o2248.incrementAndGet.
> : class org.apache.ignite.IgniteException: Failed to find atomic long: nodeIdFilter_7
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.datastructures.GridCacheAtomicLongImpl.incrementAndGet(GridCacheAtomicLongImpl.java:105)
> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor40.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at py4j.reflection.MethodInvoker.invoke(MethodInvoker.java:244)
> at py4j.reflection.ReflectionEngine.invoke(ReflectionEngine.java:357)
> at py4j.Gateway.invoke(Gateway.java:282)
> at py4j.commands.AbstractCommand.invokeMethod(AbstractCommand.java:132)
> at py4j.commands.CallCommand.execute(CallCommand.java:79)
> at py4j.GatewayConnection.run(GatewayConnection.java:238)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> Caused by: javax.cache.processor.EntryProcessorException: Failed to find atomic long: nodeIdFilter_7
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.datastructures.GridCacheAtomicLongImpl$IncrementAndGetProcessor.process(GridCacheAtomicLongImpl.java:525)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.datastructures.GridCacheAtomicLongImpl$IncrementAndGetProcessor.process(GridCacheAtomicLongImpl.java:512)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxPrepareFuture.onEntriesLocked(GridDhtTxPrepareFuture.java:424)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxPrepareFuture.prepare0(GridDhtTxPrepareFuture.java:1237)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxPrepareFuture.mapIfLocked(GridDhtTxPrepareFuture.java:677)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxPrepareFuture.prepare(GridDhtTxPrepareFuture.java:1054)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxLocal.prepareAsync(GridDhtTxLocal.java:396)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.transactions.IgniteTxHandler.prepareNearTx(IgniteTxHandler.java:519)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.transactions.IgniteTxHandler.processNearTxPrepareRequest0(IgniteTxHandler.java:150)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.transactions.IgniteTxHandler.processNearTxPrepareRequest(IgniteTxHandler.java:135)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.transactions.IgniteTxHandler.access$000(IgniteTxHandler.java:97)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.transactions.IgniteTxHandler$1.apply(IgniteTxHandler.java:177)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.transactions.IgniteTxHandler$1.apply(IgniteTxHandler.java:175)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.processMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:1056)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.onMessage0(GridCacheIoManager.java:581)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.handleMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:380)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.handleMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:306)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.access$100(GridCacheIoManager.java:101)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager$1.onMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:295)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.invokeListener(GridIoManager.java:1555)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.processRegularMessage0(GridIoManager.java:1183)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.access$4200(GridIoManager.java:126)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager$9.run(GridIoManager.java:1090)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.StripedExecutor$Stripe.run(StripedExecutor.java:505)
> ... 1 more
> {code}
> The bad news is that this IgniteAtomic cannot be removed or recreated on the same node.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)