You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by "Sobkowiak, Krzysztof" <kr...@gmail.com> on 2014/04/10 07:27:29 UTC
[DISCUSS] Upgrade ServiceMix to Karaf 2.3.5
Hi
Karaf 2.3.5 will be released soon. We should upgrade the ServiceMix
5.1.x to the new version. Sould be 5.0.x upgraded too? 5.0.x is a
maintenance branch and only fixes should be committed here. But Karaf
2.3.5 has also only fixes for 2.3.4. I think, the upgrade should make no
problems.
Best regards
Krzysztof
--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak
JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center |
Wroclaw
e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrade ServiceMix to Karaf 2.3.5
Posted by Cristiano Costantini <cr...@gmail.com>.
As it is an upgrade from Karaf 2.3.4 to 2.3.5, I think it should be
Servicemix from 5.0.0 to 5.0.1
;-)
2014-04-10 7:27 GMT+02:00 Sobkowiak, Krzysztof <kr...@gmail.com>:
> Hi
>
> Karaf 2.3.5 will be released soon. We should upgrade the ServiceMix 5.1.x
> to the new version. Sould be 5.0.x upgraded too? 5.0.x is a maintenance
> branch and only fixes should be committed here. But Karaf 2.3.5 has also
> only fixes for 2.3.4. I think, the upgrade should make no problems.
>
> Best regards
> Krzysztof
>
>
> --
> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>
> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center |
> Wroclaw
> e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrade ServiceMix to Karaf 2.3.5
Posted by "Sobkowiak, Krzysztof" <kr...@gmail.com>.
Hi Gert
Yes. It's a good idea. We have also a patch for Activiti upgrade. We
can include it too in 5.1.0 . I've finished my trainings yesterday so I
can spend the time for ServiceMix now.
Best regards
Krzysztof
On 11.04.2014 12:19, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
>
> Yeah, the main reason we have these branches for doing micro version
> releases of ServiceMix is to be able to pick up these fix/micro
> versions of our dependencies. We can always pick up some bug fixes of
> our own as well, off course ;) So I'm definitely +1 for an upgrade to
> 2.3.5 on the 5.0.x branch once it is available.
>
> Also, once Karaf 2.3.5 is out, perhaps we should consider doing a
> 5.1.0 release - I think we have a pull request ready for the upgrade
> to Camel 2.13.0 as well, so that way we can get our users going on the
> new Camel release. Wdyt?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof
> <kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Karaf 2.3.5 will be released soon. We should upgrade the ServiceMix 5.1.x to
>> the new version. Sould be 5.0.x upgraded too? 5.0.x is a maintenance branch
>> and only fixes should be committed here. But Karaf 2.3.5 has also only fixes
>> for 2.3.4. I think, the upgrade should make no problems.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Krzysztof
>>
>>
>> --
>> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>
>> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
>> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center |
>> Wroclaw
>> e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
>> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak
JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrade ServiceMix to Karaf 2.3.5
Posted by Krzysztof Sobkowiak <kr...@gmail.com>.
Hi
I have performed a quick build of ServiceMix with Karaf 2.3.5 from the
staging repository. It looks ok
* build successful
* testcases successful
* quick test of the assembly seccessful
In the final upgrade we should check whether we should upgrade any other
dependencies.
I think, the staged Karaf release is ok.
Best regards
Krzysztof
On 11.04.2014 12:54, Jamie G. wrote:
> Picking up Karaf 2.3.5 is a good idea - it's mostly bug fixes and
> dependency updates (which also contain more bug fixes). By the way,
> Karaf 2.3.5 RC1 is up for vote
> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Karaf-2-3-5-tt4032691.html
> - please take a moment, review, and post your vote to the above thread
> so we can make it available to the community as soon as possible :)
>
> --Jamie
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Gert Vanthienen
> <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>>
>> Yeah, the main reason we have these branches for doing micro version
>> releases of ServiceMix is to be able to pick up these fix/micro
>> versions of our dependencies. We can always pick up some bug fixes of
>> our own as well, off course ;) So I'm definitely +1 for an upgrade to
>> 2.3.5 on the 5.0.x branch once it is available.
>>
>> Also, once Karaf 2.3.5 is out, perhaps we should consider doing a
>> 5.1.0 release - I think we have a pull request ready for the upgrade
>> to Camel 2.13.0 as well, so that way we can get our users going on the
>> new Camel release. Wdyt?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof
>> <kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Karaf 2.3.5 will be released soon. We should upgrade the ServiceMix 5.1.x to
>>> the new version. Sould be 5.0.x upgraded too? 5.0.x is a maintenance branch
>>> and only fixes should be committed here. But Karaf 2.3.5 has also only fixes
>>> for 2.3.4. I think, the upgrade should make no problems.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>>
>>> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
>>> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center |
>>> Wroclaw
>>> e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
>>> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak
JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrade ServiceMix to Karaf 2.3.5
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
Picking up Karaf 2.3.5 is a good idea - it's mostly bug fixes and
dependency updates (which also contain more bug fixes). By the way,
Karaf 2.3.5 RC1 is up for vote
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Karaf-2-3-5-tt4032691.html
- please take a moment, review, and post your vote to the above thread
so we can make it available to the community as soon as possible :)
--Jamie
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Gert Vanthienen
<ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
>
> Yeah, the main reason we have these branches for doing micro version
> releases of ServiceMix is to be able to pick up these fix/micro
> versions of our dependencies. We can always pick up some bug fixes of
> our own as well, off course ;) So I'm definitely +1 for an upgrade to
> 2.3.5 on the 5.0.x branch once it is available.
>
> Also, once Karaf 2.3.5 is out, perhaps we should consider doing a
> 5.1.0 release - I think we have a pull request ready for the upgrade
> to Camel 2.13.0 as well, so that way we can get our users going on the
> new Camel release. Wdyt?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof
> <kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Karaf 2.3.5 will be released soon. We should upgrade the ServiceMix 5.1.x to
>> the new version. Sould be 5.0.x upgraded too? 5.0.x is a maintenance branch
>> and only fixes should be committed here. But Karaf 2.3.5 has also only fixes
>> for 2.3.4. I think, the upgrade should make no problems.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Krzysztof
>>
>>
>> --
>> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>
>> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
>> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center |
>> Wroclaw
>> e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
>> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrade ServiceMix to Karaf 2.3.5
Posted by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com>.
Hi Krzysztof,
Yeah, the main reason we have these branches for doing micro version
releases of ServiceMix is to be able to pick up these fix/micro
versions of our dependencies. We can always pick up some bug fixes of
our own as well, off course ;) So I'm definitely +1 for an upgrade to
2.3.5 on the 5.0.x branch once it is available.
Also, once Karaf 2.3.5 is out, perhaps we should consider doing a
5.1.0 release - I think we have a pull request ready for the upgrade
to Camel 2.13.0 as well, so that way we can get our users going on the
new Camel release. Wdyt?
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof
<kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Karaf 2.3.5 will be released soon. We should upgrade the ServiceMix 5.1.x to
> the new version. Sould be 5.0.x upgraded too? 5.0.x is a maintenance branch
> and only fixes should be committed here. But Karaf 2.3.5 has also only fixes
> for 2.3.4. I think, the upgrade should make no problems.
>
> Best regards
> Krzysztof
>
>
> --
> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>
> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center |
> Wroclaw
> e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
> Twitter: @KSobkowiak