[CANCEL][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC2

[James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>]

Found an issue that sunk this RC:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-901. Fix plus new RC coming
tomorrow.

Thanks,
James


On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:04 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC2. This is
> the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the 0.94 branch of Apache
> HBase and will be our second release in the incubator. The previous RC was
> sunk due to some errors in the NOTICE and LICENSE files and some
> discrepancies between the git repo source and the source bundle. This new
> RC fixes those issues as well as two additional bugs. The release includes
> both a source-only release and a convenience binary release.
>
> New features include:
> - Equi-joins through broadcast hash join
> - Shared tables over same physical HBase table
> - Read-only and updatable views
> - Multi-tenancy
> - JDBC ARRAY type
> - Sequence creation and usage
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/phoenix/phoenix-3.0.0-incubating-rc2/src/
>
> The binary artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/phoenix/phoenix-3.0.0-incubating-rc2/bin/
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/mujtaba.asc
>
> KEYS file available here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/phoenix/KEYS
>
> The hash and tag to be voted on:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-phoenix.git;a=commit;h=43bb7c478ef1d430a75b97cf685cb997a31405e2
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-phoenix.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/v3.0.0-incubating-rc2
>
> For information about the contents of this release see:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-phoenix.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/v3.0.0-incubating-rc2
>
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> James
>