You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@onami.apache.org by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> on 2012/11/26 17:22:26 UTC

defining dependencies in parent

Hi all guys,

since Onami's purpose is developing and maintaining Google Guice
extensions, I think we could define a list of dependencies in the
parent pom that are valid for every module, i.e. the guice core and
javax.inject could be managed dependencies.

WDYT?
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/

Re: defining dependencies in parent

Posted by Jordi Gerona <jo...@donky.org>.

great, that's another solution!

cheers,
jordi


On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Simone Tripodi
<si...@apache.org>wrote:

> Hola Jordi!
>
> in the parent pom it is defined in the provided scope, that should
> guantee that core guice dependency is not transitive...
>
> WDYT?
> best,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Jordi Gerona <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> > shall Guice dependency be marked as <optional>true</optional> ?
> >
> > To avoid people using Guice as a transitive dependeny
> >
> > what do you think?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Simone Tripodi
> > <si...@apache.org>wrote:
> >
> >> I think it is just guice ATM :P
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> >> http://www.99soft.org/
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Daniel Manzke
> >> <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> > Are we going to define more than guice?
> >> >
> >> > - logging
> >> > - commons
> >> > - ...
> >> >
> >> > or is it just guice? :)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2012/11/26 Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>
> >> >
> >> >> hi mate,
> >> >>
> >> >> what do you mean by `framework like style`?
> >> >>
> >> >> TIA!
> >> >> -Simo
> >> >>
> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> >> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> >> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> >> >> http://www.99soft.org/
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Daniel Manzke
> >> >> <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > +1
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Should it be as less as possible or are we going to create a
> framework
> >> >> like style?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Bye,
> >> >> > Daniel
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Von meinem iPad gesendet
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Am 26.11.2012 um 17:22 schrieb Simone Tripodi <
> >> simonetripodi@apache.org
> >> >> >:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Hi all guys,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> since Onami's purpose is developing and maintaining Google Guice
> >> >> >> extensions, I think we could define a list of dependencies in the
> >> >> >> parent pom that are valid for every module, i.e. the guice core
> and
> >> >> >> javax.inject could be managed dependencies.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> WDYT?
> >> >> >> -Simo
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> >> >> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> >> >> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> >> >> >> http://www.99soft.org/
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Viele Grüße/Best Regards
> >> >
> >> > Daniel Manzke
> >>
>

Re: defining dependencies in parent

Posted by Jordi Gerona <jo...@apache.org>.

great, that's another solution!

cheers,
jordi


On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Simone Tripodi
<si...@apache.org>wrote:

> Hola Jordi!
>
> in the parent pom it is defined in the provided scope, that should
> guantee that core guice dependency is not transitive...
>
> WDYT?
> best,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Jordi Gerona <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> > shall Guice dependency be marked as <optional>true</optional> ?
> >
> > To avoid people using Guice as a transitive dependeny
> >
> > what do you think?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Simone Tripodi
> > <si...@apache.org>wrote:
> >
> >> I think it is just guice ATM :P
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> >> http://www.99soft.org/
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Daniel Manzke
> >> <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> > Are we going to define more than guice?
> >> >
> >> > - logging
> >> > - commons
> >> > - ...
> >> >
> >> > or is it just guice? :)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2012/11/26 Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>
> >> >
> >> >> hi mate,
> >> >>
> >> >> what do you mean by `framework like style`?
> >> >>
> >> >> TIA!
> >> >> -Simo
> >> >>
> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> >> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> >> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> >> >> http://www.99soft.org/
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Daniel Manzke
> >> >> <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > +1
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Should it be as less as possible or are we going to create a
> framework
> >> >> like style?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Bye,
> >> >> > Daniel
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Von meinem iPad gesendet
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Am 26.11.2012 um 17:22 schrieb Simone Tripodi <
> >> simonetripodi@apache.org
> >> >> >:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Hi all guys,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> since Onami's purpose is developing and maintaining Google Guice
> >> >> >> extensions, I think we could define a list of dependencies in the
> >> >> >> parent pom that are valid for every module, i.e. the guice core
> and
> >> >> >> javax.inject could be managed dependencies.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> WDYT?
> >> >> >> -Simo
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> >> >> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> >> >> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> >> >> >> http://www.99soft.org/
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Viele Grüße/Best Regards
> >> >
> >> > Daniel Manzke
> >>
>

Re: defining dependencies in parent

Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.

Hola Jordi!

in the parent pom it is defined in the provided scope, that should
guantee that core guice dependency is not transitive...

WDYT?
best,
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/


On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Jordi Gerona <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> shall Guice dependency be marked as <optional>true</optional> ?
>
> To avoid people using Guice as a transitive dependeny
>
> what do you think?
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Simone Tripodi
> <si...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> I think it is just guice ATM :P
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Daniel Manzke
>> <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > Are we going to define more than guice?
>> >
>> > - logging
>> > - commons
>> > - ...
>> >
>> > or is it just guice? :)
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012/11/26 Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>
>> >
>> >> hi mate,
>> >>
>> >> what do you mean by `framework like style`?
>> >>
>> >> TIA!
>> >> -Simo
>> >>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> >> http://www.99soft.org/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Daniel Manzke
>> >> <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >> > +1
>> >> >
>> >> > Should it be as less as possible or are we going to create a framework
>> >> like style?
>> >> >
>> >> > Bye,
>> >> > Daniel
>> >> >
>> >> > Von meinem iPad gesendet
>> >> >
>> >> > Am 26.11.2012 um 17:22 schrieb Simone Tripodi <
>> simonetripodi@apache.org
>> >> >:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hi all guys,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> since Onami's purpose is developing and maintaining Google Guice
>> >> >> extensions, I think we could define a list of dependencies in the
>> >> >> parent pom that are valid for every module, i.e. the guice core and
>> >> >> javax.inject could be managed dependencies.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> WDYT?
>> >> >> -Simo
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> >> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> >> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> >> >> http://www.99soft.org/
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Viele Grüße/Best Regards
>> >
>> > Daniel Manzke
>>

Re: defining dependencies in parent

Posted by Jordi Gerona <jo...@apache.org>.

shall Guice dependency be marked as <optional>true</optional> ?

To avoid people using Guice as a transitive dependeny

what do you think?


On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Simone Tripodi
<si...@apache.org>wrote:

> I think it is just guice ATM :P
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Daniel Manzke
> <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Are we going to define more than guice?
> >
> > - logging
> > - commons
> > - ...
> >
> > or is it just guice? :)
> >
> >
> > 2012/11/26 Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>
> >
> >> hi mate,
> >>
> >> what do you mean by `framework like style`?
> >>
> >> TIA!
> >> -Simo
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> >> http://www.99soft.org/
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Daniel Manzke
> >> <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > Should it be as less as possible or are we going to create a framework
> >> like style?
> >> >
> >> > Bye,
> >> > Daniel
> >> >
> >> > Von meinem iPad gesendet
> >> >
> >> > Am 26.11.2012 um 17:22 schrieb Simone Tripodi <
> simonetripodi@apache.org
> >> >:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi all guys,
> >> >>
> >> >> since Onami's purpose is developing and maintaining Google Guice
> >> >> extensions, I think we could define a list of dependencies in the
> >> >> parent pom that are valid for every module, i.e. the guice core and
> >> >> javax.inject could be managed dependencies.
> >> >>
> >> >> WDYT?
> >> >> -Simo
> >> >>
> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> >> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> >> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> >> >> http://www.99soft.org/
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Viele Grüße/Best Regards
> >
> > Daniel Manzke
>

Re: defining dependencies in parent

Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.

I think it is just guice ATM :P

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/


On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Daniel Manzke
<da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Are we going to define more than guice?
>
> - logging
> - commons
> - ...
>
> or is it just guice? :)
>
>
> 2012/11/26 Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>
>
>> hi mate,
>>
>> what do you mean by `framework like style`?
>>
>> TIA!
>> -Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Daniel Manzke
>> <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > +1
>> >
>> > Should it be as less as possible or are we going to create a framework
>> like style?
>> >
>> > Bye,
>> > Daniel
>> >
>> > Von meinem iPad gesendet
>> >
>> > Am 26.11.2012 um 17:22 schrieb Simone Tripodi <simonetripodi@apache.org
>> >:
>> >
>> >> Hi all guys,
>> >>
>> >> since Onami's purpose is developing and maintaining Google Guice
>> >> extensions, I think we could define a list of dependencies in the
>> >> parent pom that are valid for every module, i.e. the guice core and
>> >> javax.inject could be managed dependencies.
>> >>
>> >> WDYT?
>> >> -Simo
>> >>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> >> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Viele Grüße/Best Regards
>
> Daniel Manzke

Re: defining dependencies in parent

Posted by Daniel Manzke <da...@googlemail.com>.

Are we going to define more than guice?

- logging
- commons
- ...

or is it just guice? :)


2012/11/26 Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>

> hi mate,
>
> what do you mean by `framework like style`?
>
> TIA!
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Daniel Manzke
> <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Should it be as less as possible or are we going to create a framework
> like style?
> >
> > Bye,
> > Daniel
> >
> > Von meinem iPad gesendet
> >
> > Am 26.11.2012 um 17:22 schrieb Simone Tripodi <simonetripodi@apache.org
> >:
> >
> >> Hi all guys,
> >>
> >> since Onami's purpose is developing and maintaining Google Guice
> >> extensions, I think we could define a list of dependencies in the
> >> parent pom that are valid for every module, i.e. the guice core and
> >> javax.inject could be managed dependencies.
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >> -Simo
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> >> http://www.99soft.org/
>



-- 
Viele Grüße/Best Regards

Daniel Manzke

Re: defining dependencies in parent

Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.

hi mate,

what do you mean by `framework like style`?

TIA!
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/


On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Daniel Manzke
<da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Should it be as less as possible or are we going to create a framework like style?
>
> Bye,
> Daniel
>
> Von meinem iPad gesendet
>
> Am 26.11.2012 um 17:22 schrieb Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>:
>
>> Hi all guys,
>>
>> since Onami's purpose is developing and maintaining Google Guice
>> extensions, I think we could define a list of dependencies in the
>> parent pom that are valid for every module, i.e. the guice core and
>> javax.inject could be managed dependencies.
>>
>> WDYT?
>> -Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/

Re: defining dependencies in parent

Posted by Daniel Manzke <da...@googlemail.com>.

+1

Should it be as less as possible or are we going to create a framework like style?

Bye,
Daniel

Von meinem iPad gesendet

Am 26.11.2012 um 17:22 schrieb Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>:

> Hi all guys,
> 
> since Onami's purpose is developing and maintaining Google Guice
> extensions, I think we could define a list of dependencies in the
> parent pom that are valid for every module, i.e. the guice core and
> javax.inject could be managed dependencies.
> 
> WDYT?
> -Simo
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/