You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> on 2009/09/18 10:21:05 UTC
[karaf] sub-modules naming
Currently, Karaf has maven modules, but their naming is not
consistent. We have:
* karaf/jaas/jaas-boot
* karaf/features/core
* karaf/deployer/blueprint
* karaf/gshell/gshell-admin
So I'd like to fix those. The question is which one we prefer ? I'm
kinda leaning towards karaf/features/boot i.e not repeating the parent
module in the name.
Also, I think we should rename gshell to shell, given we don't use
gshell anymore but switched to gogo. Shell is a bit more neutral.
Thoughts ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: [karaf] sub-modules naming
Posted by Charles Moulliard <cm...@gmail.com>.
++1 for me
Charles Moulliard
Senior Enterprise Architect
Apache Camel Committer
*****************************
blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently, Karaf has maven modules, but their naming is not
> consistent. We have:
> * karaf/jaas/jaas-boot
> * karaf/features/core
> * karaf/deployer/blueprint
> * karaf/gshell/gshell-admin
>
> So I'd like to fix those. The question is which one we prefer ? I'm
> kinda leaning towards karaf/features/boot i.e not repeating the parent
> module in the name.
> Also, I think we should rename gshell to shell, given we don't use
> gshell anymore but switched to gogo. Shell is a bit more neutral.
> Thoughts ?
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
Re: [karaf] sub-modules naming
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 9/18/09 10:21, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Currently, Karaf has maven modules, but their naming is not
> consistent. We have:
> * karaf/jaas/jaas-boot
> * karaf/features/core
> * karaf/deployer/blueprint
> * karaf/gshell/gshell-admin
>
> So I'd like to fix those. The question is which one we prefer ? I'm
> kinda leaning towards karaf/features/boot i.e not repeating the parent
> module in the name.
>
+1
> Also, I think we should rename gshell to shell, given we don't use
> gshell anymore but switched to gogo. Shell is a bit more neutral.
> Thoughts ?
>
+1
-> richard