Re: svn commit: r371616 - /apr/apr-util/branches/0.9.x/CHANGES

[Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu>]

rooneg@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rooneg
> Date: Mon Jan 23 10:40:59 2006
> New Revision: 371616
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=371616&view=rev
> Log:
> * CHANGES: Note Berkeley DB 4.4 support.
>
> Modified:
>     apr/apr-util/branches/0.9.x/CHANGES
>
> Modified: apr/apr-util/branches/0.9.x/CHANGES
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/apr/apr-util/branches/0.9.x/CHANGES?rev=371616&r1=371615&r2=371616&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- apr/apr-util/branches/0.9.x/CHANGES (original)
> +++ apr/apr-util/branches/0.9.x/CHANGES Mon Jan 23 10:40:59 2006
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>  Changes with APR-util 0.9.8-dev
>  
> -
> +  *) Add support for Berkeley DB 4.4 to the configure scripts.
> +     [Garrett Rooney]
>  
>  Changes with APR-util 0.9.7
>   
Would it make sense to roll a 0.9.8 of apr and apr-util, so that the 
upcoming httpd-2.0.56 and subversion-1.3.1 can use a released version 
that supports bdb-4.4? Are there any outstanding patches waiting for 
backport to apr-0.9.x?

-- Brane

Re: svn commit: r371616 - /apr/apr-util/branches/0.9.x/CHANGES

["William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>]

Branko Čibej wrote:
> 
> Would it make sense to roll a 0.9.8 of apr and apr-util, so that the 
> upcoming httpd-2.0.56 and subversion-1.3.1 can use a released version 
> that supports bdb-4.4? Are there any outstanding patches waiting for 
> backport to apr-0.9.x?

Makes sense.  A few submitted patches I'd like to commit, if we have just
a couple days to get those in.

Bill