Is there a good reason to keep http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/ around?

[Eric Hanchrow <of...@blarg.net>]

Occasionally someone in #svn will ask a question about what they've read
there.  (Apparently there are still many links to it).

Since that version of the book is so old, oughtn't we do one of the following:

* remove it entirely

* replace it with a redirect to the current book

* annotate each page with a big fat warning that says "This is laughably
  obsolete; please see http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/ instead"

?

-- 
I've laid out in my will that my heirs should continue working
on my .emacs
        -- johnw

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Is there a good reason to keep http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/ around?

[Daniel Rall <dl...@collab.net>]

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007, Eric Hanchrow wrote:

> Occasionally someone in #svn will ask a question about what they've read
> there.  (Apparently there are still many links to it).
> 
> Since that version of the book is so old, oughtn't we do one of the following:
> 
> * remove it entirely
> 
> * replace it with a redirect to the current book
> 
> * annotate each page with a big fat warning that says "This is laughably
>   obsolete; please see http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/ instead"

A redirect sounds pretty reasonable to me, perhaps with a way to still
get to the old book (just not at the old URL)...?