You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bigtop.apache.org by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> on 2011/08/19 20:25:38 UTC
[VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
0.1.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
*** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working days
from now)
Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
Source tarball, checksums, signature:
http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
The tag to be voted on:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a successful
PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
Thanks!
A.
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
I'm not sure if I'm supposed to explicitly vote, but just in case:
+1 binding
A.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Personally, I'm fine with releasing so long as CentOS5 and Ubuntu work -
> anything else can be fixed/added in 0.2.0-incubating.
>
> A.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> My last patch for centos5 broke openSUSE/Mageia (here lies the troubles
>> of having different set of VMs at home and at work).
>> I am booting up right now a bunch of VMs to ensure next patch won't
>> break anything.
>> Could we re-cut a rc after that patch?
>>
>>
>> On 08/19/2011 11:25 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >
>> > It fixes the following issues:
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >
>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working
>> days
>> > from now)
>> >
>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >
>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>> >
>> > The tag to be voted on:
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>> >
>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>> >
>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
>> successful
>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > A.
>> >
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
I'm not sure if I'm supposed to explicitly vote, but just in case:
+1 binding
A.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Personally, I'm fine with releasing so long as CentOS5 and Ubuntu work -
> anything else can be fixed/added in 0.2.0-incubating.
>
> A.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> My last patch for centos5 broke openSUSE/Mageia (here lies the troubles
>> of having different set of VMs at home and at work).
>> I am booting up right now a bunch of VMs to ensure next patch won't
>> break anything.
>> Could we re-cut a rc after that patch?
>>
>>
>> On 08/19/2011 11:25 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >
>> > It fixes the following issues:
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >
>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working
>> days
>> > from now)
>> >
>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >
>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>> >
>> > The tag to be voted on:
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>> >
>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>> >
>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
>> successful
>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > A.
>> >
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Personally, I'm fine with releasing so long as CentOS5 and Ubuntu work -
anything else can be fixed/added in 0.2.0-incubating.
A.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org> wrote:
> My last patch for centos5 broke openSUSE/Mageia (here lies the troubles
> of having different set of VMs at home and at work).
> I am booting up right now a bunch of VMs to ensure next patch won't
> break anything.
> Could we re-cut a rc after that patch?
>
>
> On 08/19/2011 11:25 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >
> > It fixes the following issues:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >
> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working
> days
> > from now)
> >
> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >
> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
> >
> > The tag to be voted on:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
> >
> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >
> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
> successful
> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > A.
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Personally, I'm fine with releasing so long as CentOS5 and Ubuntu work -
anything else can be fixed/added in 0.2.0-incubating.
A.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org> wrote:
> My last patch for centos5 broke openSUSE/Mageia (here lies the troubles
> of having different set of VMs at home and at work).
> I am booting up right now a bunch of VMs to ensure next patch won't
> break anything.
> Could we re-cut a rc after that patch?
>
>
> On 08/19/2011 11:25 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >
> > It fixes the following issues:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >
> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working
> days
> > from now)
> >
> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >
> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
> >
> > The tag to be voted on:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
> >
> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >
> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
> successful
> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > A.
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org>.
My last patch for centos5 broke openSUSE/Mageia (here lies the troubles
of having different set of VMs at home and at work).
I am booting up right now a bunch of VMs to ensure next patch won't
break anything.
Could we re-cut a rc after that patch?
On 08/19/2011 11:25 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.1.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>
> *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working days
> from now)
>
> Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>
> Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>
> The tag to be voted on:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>
> Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>
> Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a successful
> PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>
> Thanks!
>
> A.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 03:08:47AM +0100, sebb wrote:
> Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
I'm curious: what's the harm in including the .gitignore files? Sure, they
serve no practical purpose in a release tarball, but it's nice to have source
releases which are file-for-file identical to a version-control tag.
Marvin Humphrey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Hi -
The POM is actually just for site generation currently. In the next release,
we'll probably have Maven artifacts to release as well, though.
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Francis De Brabandere
<fr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> You seem to have a pom.xml but if I understood correctly you're not
> using maven for releasing. In case you are this might be useful:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/empiredb/Release+Process
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Was actually doing that as you wrote this. =)
> >
> > A.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This thread has got rather long and complicated.
> >>
> >> May I suggest creating a new thread (i.e. not a reply) with just the
> >> details required for the new vote?
> >>
> >> Change the subject to include RC2 please.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> On 22 August 2011 16:26, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
> >> >
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> >> >
> >> > A.
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
> >> >>
> >> >> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
> >> >> when the vote succeeds.
> >> >>
> >> >> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
> >> >>
> >> >> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
> >> >>
> >> >> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
> >> >>
> >> >> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> > Tag replaced.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > A.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > New candidate up at
> >> >> >> >
> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
> >> >> .
> >> >> >> The
> >> >> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian
> >> packaging
> >> >> >> files
> >> >> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has
> >> been
> >> >> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
> >> >> excluded
> >> >> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has
> >> been
> >> >> >> built
> >> >> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > A.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly.
> The
> >> >> >> tarball
> >> >> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar
> on
> >> OS
> >> >> X -
> >> >> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to
> get
> >> >> the
> >> >> >> files
> >> >> >> >> missing headers today as well.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> A.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
> >> >> >> >>> list](
> >> >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics
> )
> >> >> >> >>> or [developer list](
> >> >> >> >>>
> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics
> >> ).
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <
> andrew.bayer@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case,
> >> please
> >> >> >> find
> >> >> >> >>> RC1
> >> >> >> >>> >> at
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> >> >> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be
> >> excluded.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> > No sign yet.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> A.
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The
> .gitignore
> >> >> files -
> >> >> >> >>> I'll
> >> >> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball,
> but
> >> the
> >> >> >> ones
> >> >> >> >>> that
> >> >> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>> A.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there
> are
> >> >> some
> >> >> >> >>> files
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way
> because
> >> >> >> they're
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow
> >> comments,
> >> >> etc
> >> >> >> -
> >> >> >> >>> these
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm
> >> missing
> >> >> >> >>> something.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell,
> >> everything
> >> >> is
> >> >> >> >>> under
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same
> as
> >> in
> >> >> >> SVN,
> >> >> >> >>> same
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet
> >> being
> >> >> >> >>> built/used,
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If
> >> there
> >> >> >> are
> >> >> >> >>> any
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll
> >> check
> >> >> it
> >> >> >> >>> out.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> A.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <
> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop,
> >> >> version
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday,
> August
> >> 24
> >> >> (3
> >> >> >> >>> working
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> days
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > from now)
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be
> >> added
> >> >> to
> >> >> >> SVN
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed
> on
> >> the
> >> >> >> bigtop
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> website.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from
> normal
> >> >> (not
> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> blocker).
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
> >> >> >> "developed
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then
> not
> >> be
> >> >> >> left
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> dangling.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included
> in
> >> the
> >> >> >> source
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> release.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the
> >> archive
> >> >> - I
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level
> directory
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel
> >> >> directories
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very
> difficult
> >> to
> >> >> >> check
> >> >> >> >>> the
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to
> sign
> >> the
> >> >> >> >>> release:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the
> release
> >> >> after
> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> successful
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > A.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> >> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> >> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.somatik.be
> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Hi -
The POM is actually just for site generation currently. In the next release,
we'll probably have Maven artifacts to release as well, though.
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Francis De Brabandere
<fr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> You seem to have a pom.xml but if I understood correctly you're not
> using maven for releasing. In case you are this might be useful:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/empiredb/Release+Process
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Was actually doing that as you wrote this. =)
> >
> > A.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This thread has got rather long and complicated.
> >>
> >> May I suggest creating a new thread (i.e. not a reply) with just the
> >> details required for the new vote?
> >>
> >> Change the subject to include RC2 please.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> On 22 August 2011 16:26, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
> >> >
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> >> >
> >> > A.
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
> >> >>
> >> >> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
> >> >> when the vote succeeds.
> >> >>
> >> >> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
> >> >>
> >> >> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
> >> >>
> >> >> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
> >> >>
> >> >> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> > Tag replaced.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > A.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > New candidate up at
> >> >> >> >
> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
> >> >> .
> >> >> >> The
> >> >> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian
> >> packaging
> >> >> >> files
> >> >> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has
> >> been
> >> >> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
> >> >> excluded
> >> >> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has
> >> been
> >> >> >> built
> >> >> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > A.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly.
> The
> >> >> >> tarball
> >> >> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar
> on
> >> OS
> >> >> X -
> >> >> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to
> get
> >> >> the
> >> >> >> files
> >> >> >> >> missing headers today as well.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> A.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
> >> >> >> >>> list](
> >> >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics
> )
> >> >> >> >>> or [developer list](
> >> >> >> >>>
> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics
> >> ).
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <
> andrew.bayer@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case,
> >> please
> >> >> >> find
> >> >> >> >>> RC1
> >> >> >> >>> >> at
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> >> >> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be
> >> excluded.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> > No sign yet.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> A.
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The
> .gitignore
> >> >> files -
> >> >> >> >>> I'll
> >> >> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball,
> but
> >> the
> >> >> >> ones
> >> >> >> >>> that
> >> >> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>> A.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there
> are
> >> >> some
> >> >> >> >>> files
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way
> because
> >> >> >> they're
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow
> >> comments,
> >> >> etc
> >> >> >> -
> >> >> >> >>> these
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm
> >> missing
> >> >> >> >>> something.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell,
> >> everything
> >> >> is
> >> >> >> >>> under
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same
> as
> >> in
> >> >> >> SVN,
> >> >> >> >>> same
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet
> >> being
> >> >> >> >>> built/used,
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If
> >> there
> >> >> >> are
> >> >> >> >>> any
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll
> >> check
> >> >> it
> >> >> >> >>> out.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> A.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <
> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop,
> >> >> version
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday,
> August
> >> 24
> >> >> (3
> >> >> >> >>> working
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> days
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > from now)
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be
> >> added
> >> >> to
> >> >> >> SVN
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed
> on
> >> the
> >> >> >> bigtop
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> website.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from
> normal
> >> >> (not
> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> blocker).
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
> >> >> >> "developed
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then
> not
> >> be
> >> >> >> left
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> dangling.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included
> in
> >> the
> >> >> >> source
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> release.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the
> >> archive
> >> >> - I
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level
> directory
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel
> >> >> directories
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very
> difficult
> >> to
> >> >> >> check
> >> >> >> >>> the
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to
> sign
> >> the
> >> >> >> >>> release:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the
> release
> >> >> after
> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> successful
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > A.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> >> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> >> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.somatik.be
> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Francis De Brabandere <fr...@gmail.com>.
You seem to have a pom.xml but if I understood correctly you're not
using maven for releasing. In case you are this might be useful:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/empiredb/Release+Process
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Was actually doing that as you wrote this. =)
>
> A.
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This thread has got rather long and complicated.
>>
>> May I suggest creating a new thread (i.e. not a reply) with just the
>> details required for the new vote?
>>
>> Change the subject to include RC2 please.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> On 22 August 2011 16:26, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
>> >
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
>> >
>> > A.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
>> >>
>> >> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
>> >> when the vote succeeds.
>> >>
>> >> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
>> >>
>> >> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
>> >>
>> >> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
>> >>
>> >> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Tag replaced.
>> >> >
>> >> > A.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >> > New candidate up at
>> >> >> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>> >> .
>> >> >> The
>> >> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian
>> packaging
>> >> >> files
>> >> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has
>> been
>> >> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
>> >> excluded
>> >> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has
>> been
>> >> >> built
>> >> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > A.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
>> >> >> tarball
>> >> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on
>> OS
>> >> X -
>> >> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
>> >> the
>> >> >> files
>> >> >> >> missing headers today as well.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> A.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>> >> >> >>> list](
>> >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>> >> >> >>> or [developer list](
>> >> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics
>> ).
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case,
>> please
>> >> >> find
>> >> >> >>> RC1
>> >> >> >>> >> at
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>> >> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be
>> excluded.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > No sign yet.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> A.
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
>> >> files -
>> >> >> >>> I'll
>> >> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but
>> the
>> >> >> ones
>> >> >> >>> that
>> >> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>> >> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >>> A.
>> >> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are
>> >> some
>> >> >> >>> files
>> >> >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
>> >> >> they're
>> >> >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow
>> comments,
>> >> etc
>> >> >> -
>> >> >> >>> these
>> >> >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm
>> missing
>> >> >> >>> something.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell,
>> everything
>> >> is
>> >> >> >>> under
>> >> >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as
>> in
>> >> >> SVN,
>> >> >> >>> same
>> >> >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet
>> being
>> >> >> >>> built/used,
>> >> >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If
>> there
>> >> >> are
>> >> >> >>> any
>> >> >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll
>> check
>> >> it
>> >> >> >>> out.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>> A.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <
>> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop,
>> >> version
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August
>> 24
>> >> (3
>> >> >> >>> working
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> days
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > from now)
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be
>> added
>> >> to
>> >> >> SVN
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on
>> the
>> >> >> bigtop
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> website.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal
>> >> (not
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> blocker).
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
>> >> >> "developed
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not
>> be
>> >> >> left
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> dangling.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in
>> the
>> >> >> source
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> release.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the
>> archive
>> >> - I
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel
>> >> directories
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult
>> to
>> >> >> check
>> >> >> >>> the
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign
>> the
>> >> >> >>> release:
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release
>> >> after
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> successful
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > A.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> >> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
--
http://www.somatik.be
Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Was actually doing that as you wrote this. =)
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This thread has got rather long and complicated.
>
> May I suggest creating a new thread (i.e. not a reply) with just the
> details required for the new vote?
>
> Change the subject to include RC2 please.
>
> Thanks!
> On 22 August 2011 16:26, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> >
> > A.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
> >>
> >> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
> >> when the vote succeeds.
> >>
> >> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
> >>
> >> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
> >>
> >> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
> >>
> >> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Tag replaced.
> >> >
> >> > A.
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> > New candidate up at
> >> >> >
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
> >> .
> >> >> The
> >> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian
> packaging
> >> >> files
> >> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has
> been
> >> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
> >> excluded
> >> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has
> been
> >> >> built
> >> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
> >> >>
> >> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
> >> >>
> >> >> > A.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
> >> >> tarball
> >> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on
> OS
> >> X -
> >> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
> >> the
> >> >> files
> >> >> >> missing headers today as well.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> A.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
> >> >> >>> list](
> >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
> >> >> >>> or [developer list](
> >> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics
> ).
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case,
> please
> >> >> find
> >> >> >>> RC1
> >> >> >>> >> at
> >> >> >>>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> >> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be
> excluded.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > No sign yet.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >> A.
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
> >> files -
> >> >> >>> I'll
> >> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but
> the
> >> >> ones
> >> >> >>> that
> >> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>> A.
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are
> >> some
> >> >> >>> files
> >> >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
> >> >> they're
> >> >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow
> comments,
> >> etc
> >> >> -
> >> >> >>> these
> >> >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm
> missing
> >> >> >>> something.
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell,
> everything
> >> is
> >> >> >>> under
> >> >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as
> in
> >> >> SVN,
> >> >> >>> same
> >> >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet
> being
> >> >> >>> built/used,
> >> >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If
> there
> >> >> are
> >> >> >>> any
> >> >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll
> check
> >> it
> >> >> >>> out.
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> A.
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <
> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop,
> >> version
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August
> 24
> >> (3
> >> >> >>> working
> >> >> >>> >>>>> days
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > from now)
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be
> added
> >> to
> >> >> SVN
> >> >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on
> the
> >> >> bigtop
> >> >> >>> >>>>> website.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal
> >> (not
> >> >> a
> >> >> >>> >>>>> blocker).
> >> >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
> >> >> "developed
> >> >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not
> be
> >> >> left
> >> >> >>> >>>>> dangling.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in
> the
> >> >> source
> >> >> >>> >>>>> release.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the
> archive
> >> - I
> >> >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
> >> >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel
> >> directories
> >> >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult
> to
> >> >> check
> >> >> >>> the
> >> >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign
> the
> >> >> >>> release:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release
> >> after
> >> >> a
> >> >> >>> >>>>> successful
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > A.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Was actually doing that as you wrote this. =)
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This thread has got rather long and complicated.
>
> May I suggest creating a new thread (i.e. not a reply) with just the
> details required for the new vote?
>
> Change the subject to include RC2 please.
>
> Thanks!
> On 22 August 2011 16:26, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> >
> > A.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
> >>
> >> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
> >> when the vote succeeds.
> >>
> >> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
> >>
> >> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
> >>
> >> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
> >>
> >> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Tag replaced.
> >> >
> >> > A.
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> > New candidate up at
> >> >> >
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
> >> .
> >> >> The
> >> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian
> packaging
> >> >> files
> >> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has
> been
> >> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
> >> excluded
> >> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has
> been
> >> >> built
> >> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
> >> >>
> >> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
> >> >>
> >> >> > A.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
> >> >> tarball
> >> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on
> OS
> >> X -
> >> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
> >> the
> >> >> files
> >> >> >> missing headers today as well.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> A.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
> >> >> >>> list](
> >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
> >> >> >>> or [developer list](
> >> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics
> ).
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case,
> please
> >> >> find
> >> >> >>> RC1
> >> >> >>> >> at
> >> >> >>>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> >> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be
> excluded.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > No sign yet.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >> A.
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
> >> files -
> >> >> >>> I'll
> >> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but
> the
> >> >> ones
> >> >> >>> that
> >> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>> A.
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are
> >> some
> >> >> >>> files
> >> >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
> >> >> they're
> >> >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow
> comments,
> >> etc
> >> >> -
> >> >> >>> these
> >> >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm
> missing
> >> >> >>> something.
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell,
> everything
> >> is
> >> >> >>> under
> >> >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as
> in
> >> >> SVN,
> >> >> >>> same
> >> >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet
> being
> >> >> >>> built/used,
> >> >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If
> there
> >> >> are
> >> >> >>> any
> >> >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll
> check
> >> it
> >> >> >>> out.
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> A.
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <
> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop,
> >> version
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August
> 24
> >> (3
> >> >> >>> working
> >> >> >>> >>>>> days
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > from now)
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be
> added
> >> to
> >> >> SVN
> >> >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on
> the
> >> >> bigtop
> >> >> >>> >>>>> website.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal
> >> (not
> >> >> a
> >> >> >>> >>>>> blocker).
> >> >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
> >> >> "developed
> >> >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not
> be
> >> >> left
> >> >> >>> >>>>> dangling.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in
> the
> >> >> source
> >> >> >>> >>>>> release.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the
> archive
> >> - I
> >> >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
> >> >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel
> >> directories
> >> >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult
> to
> >> >> check
> >> >> >>> the
> >> >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign
> the
> >> >> >>> release:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release
> >> after
> >> >> a
> >> >> >>> >>>>> successful
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > A.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
This thread has got rather long and complicated.
May I suggest creating a new thread (i.e. not a reply) with just the
details required for the new vote?
Change the subject to include RC2 please.
Thanks!
On 22 August 2011 16:26, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
>
> A.
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
>>
>> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
>> when the vote succeeds.
>>
>> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
>>
>> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
>>
>> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
>>
>> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Tag replaced.
>> >
>> > A.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > New candidate up at
>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>> .
>> >> The
>> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging
>> >> files
>> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
>> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
>> excluded
>> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been
>> >> built
>> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>> >> >
>> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>> >>
>> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>> >>
>> >> > A.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
>> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
>> >> tarball
>> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS
>> X -
>> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
>> the
>> >> files
>> >> >> missing headers today as well.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> A.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>> >> >>> list](
>> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>> >> >>> or [developer list](
>> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please
>> >> find
>> >> >>> RC1
>> >> >>> >> at
>> >> >>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > No sign yet.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> A.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
>> files -
>> >> >>> I'll
>> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the
>> >> ones
>> >> >>> that
>> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> A.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are
>> some
>> >> >>> files
>> >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
>> >> they're
>> >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments,
>> etc
>> >> -
>> >> >>> these
>> >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
>> >> >>> something.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything
>> is
>> >> >>> under
>> >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in
>> >> SVN,
>> >> >>> same
>> >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
>> >> >>> built/used,
>> >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there
>> >> are
>> >> >>> any
>> >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check
>> it
>> >> >>> out.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>> A.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop,
>> version
>> >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24
>> (3
>> >> >>> working
>> >> >>> >>>>> days
>> >> >>> >>>>> > from now)
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>> >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added
>> to
>> >> SVN
>> >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the
>> >> bigtop
>> >> >>> >>>>> website.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal
>> (not
>> >> a
>> >> >>> >>>>> blocker).
>> >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
>> >> "developed
>> >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be
>> >> left
>> >> >>> >>>>> dangling.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the
>> >> source
>> >> >>> >>>>> release.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive
>> - I
>> >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>> >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel
>> directories
>> >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to
>> >> check
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
>> >> >>> release:
>> >> >>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release
>> after
>> >> a
>> >> >>> >>>>> successful
>> >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > A.
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> fwiw, in this case, we weren't releasing via Maven, so there wasn't a
> technical reason to reuse the tag.
>
> And yeah, sorry, this is my first ever ASF release, and our mentors
> suggested we try releasing in order to find out what needed to be fixed for
> the release. =)
Ah, just what you were hoping for, contradictory direction. Sorry,
we're really good at that here at the incubator.
>
> A.
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
>> >
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
>> >
>> > A.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
>>
>> Two points here.
>>
>> 1) It's a bad idea to do serious QA only as part of a release vote. It
>> leads to a lot of noise and duplicated effort. Some of what led to a
>> respin here could have been tested for before starting a vote.
>>
>> 2) Sebb, I'm sorry to point out that labels are frequently mutated as
>> part of the release process in various TLP's of which am a part. The
>> typical procedure is:
>>
>> 1) Try very hard to sort out any possible problems.
>> 2) Run maven-release-plugin. This creates a tag named after the
>> proposed release (e.g. cxf-2.4).
>> 3) Start vote.
>> 3) If awful turns up, delete tag, goto 1.
>>
>> The problem is that maven metadata captures the actual svn path, so if
>> you try to take the '-rcn and rename' you end up with poms with the
>> wrong svn tags in them. So we're all stuck with not-quite-immutable
>> tags.
>>
>> >>
>> >> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
>> >> when the vote succeeds.
>> >>
>> >> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
>> >>
>> >> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
>> >>
>> >> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
>> >>
>> >> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Tag replaced.
>> >> >
>> >> > A.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >> > New candidate up at
>> >> >> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>> >> .
>> >> >> The
>> >> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian
>> packaging
>> >> >> files
>> >> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has
>> been
>> >> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
>> >> excluded
>> >> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has
>> been
>> >> >> built
>> >> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > A.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
>> >> >> tarball
>> >> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on
>> OS
>> >> X -
>> >> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
>> >> the
>> >> >> files
>> >> >> >> missing headers today as well.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> A.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>> >> >> >>> list](
>> >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>> >> >> >>> or [developer list](
>> >> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics
>> ).
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case,
>> please
>> >> >> find
>> >> >> >>> RC1
>> >> >> >>> >> at
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>> >> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be
>> excluded.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > No sign yet.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> A.
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
>> >> files -
>> >> >> >>> I'll
>> >> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but
>> the
>> >> >> ones
>> >> >> >>> that
>> >> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>> >> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >>> A.
>> >> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are
>> >> some
>> >> >> >>> files
>> >> >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
>> >> >> they're
>> >> >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow
>> comments,
>> >> etc
>> >> >> -
>> >> >> >>> these
>> >> >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm
>> missing
>> >> >> >>> something.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell,
>> everything
>> >> is
>> >> >> >>> under
>> >> >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as
>> in
>> >> >> SVN,
>> >> >> >>> same
>> >> >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet
>> being
>> >> >> >>> built/used,
>> >> >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If
>> there
>> >> >> are
>> >> >> >>> any
>> >> >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll
>> check
>> >> it
>> >> >> >>> out.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>> A.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <
>> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop,
>> >> version
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August
>> 24
>> >> (3
>> >> >> >>> working
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> days
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > from now)
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be
>> added
>> >> to
>> >> >> SVN
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on
>> the
>> >> >> bigtop
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> website.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal
>> >> (not
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> blocker).
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
>> >> >> "developed
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not
>> be
>> >> >> left
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> dangling.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in
>> the
>> >> >> source
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> release.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the
>> archive
>> >> - I
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel
>> >> directories
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult
>> to
>> >> >> check
>> >> >> >>> the
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign
>> the
>> >> >> >>> release:
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release
>> >> after
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> successful
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > A.
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> >> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
fwiw, in this case, we weren't releasing via Maven, so there wasn't a
technical reason to reuse the tag.
And yeah, sorry, this is my first ever ASF release, and our mentors
suggested we try releasing in order to find out what needed to be fixed for
the release. =)
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> >
> > A.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
>
> Two points here.
>
> 1) It's a bad idea to do serious QA only as part of a release vote. It
> leads to a lot of noise and duplicated effort. Some of what led to a
> respin here could have been tested for before starting a vote.
>
> 2) Sebb, I'm sorry to point out that labels are frequently mutated as
> part of the release process in various TLP's of which am a part. The
> typical procedure is:
>
> 1) Try very hard to sort out any possible problems.
> 2) Run maven-release-plugin. This creates a tag named after the
> proposed release (e.g. cxf-2.4).
> 3) Start vote.
> 3) If awful turns up, delete tag, goto 1.
>
> The problem is that maven metadata captures the actual svn path, so if
> you try to take the '-rcn and rename' you end up with poms with the
> wrong svn tags in them. So we're all stuck with not-quite-immutable
> tags.
>
> >>
> >> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
> >> when the vote succeeds.
> >>
> >> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
> >>
> >> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
> >>
> >> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
> >>
> >> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Tag replaced.
> >> >
> >> > A.
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> > New candidate up at
> >> >> >
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
> >> .
> >> >> The
> >> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian
> packaging
> >> >> files
> >> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has
> been
> >> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
> >> excluded
> >> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has
> been
> >> >> built
> >> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
> >> >>
> >> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
> >> >>
> >> >> > A.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
> >> >> tarball
> >> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on
> OS
> >> X -
> >> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
> >> the
> >> >> files
> >> >> >> missing headers today as well.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> A.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
> >> >> >>> list](
> >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
> >> >> >>> or [developer list](
> >> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics
> ).
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case,
> please
> >> >> find
> >> >> >>> RC1
> >> >> >>> >> at
> >> >> >>>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> >> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be
> excluded.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > No sign yet.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >> A.
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
> >> files -
> >> >> >>> I'll
> >> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but
> the
> >> >> ones
> >> >> >>> that
> >> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>> A.
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are
> >> some
> >> >> >>> files
> >> >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
> >> >> they're
> >> >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow
> comments,
> >> etc
> >> >> -
> >> >> >>> these
> >> >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm
> missing
> >> >> >>> something.
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell,
> everything
> >> is
> >> >> >>> under
> >> >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as
> in
> >> >> SVN,
> >> >> >>> same
> >> >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet
> being
> >> >> >>> built/used,
> >> >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If
> there
> >> >> are
> >> >> >>> any
> >> >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll
> check
> >> it
> >> >> >>> out.
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> A.
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <
> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop,
> >> version
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August
> 24
> >> (3
> >> >> >>> working
> >> >> >>> >>>>> days
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > from now)
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be
> added
> >> to
> >> >> SVN
> >> >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on
> the
> >> >> bigtop
> >> >> >>> >>>>> website.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal
> >> (not
> >> >> a
> >> >> >>> >>>>> blocker).
> >> >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
> >> >> "developed
> >> >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not
> be
> >> >> left
> >> >> >>> >>>>> dangling.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in
> the
> >> >> source
> >> >> >>> >>>>> release.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the
> archive
> >> - I
> >> >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
> >> >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel
> >> directories
> >> >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult
> to
> >> >> check
> >> >> >>> the
> >> >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign
> the
> >> >> >>> release:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release
> >> after
> >> >> a
> >> >> >>> >>>>> successful
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > A.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 22 August 2011 16:56, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
>>
>> A.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
>
> Two points here.
>
> 1) It's a bad idea to do serious QA only as part of a release vote. It
> leads to a lot of noise and duplicated effort. Some of what led to a
> respin here could have been tested for before starting a vote.
+1
> 2) Sebb, I'm sorry to point out that labels are frequently mutated as
> part of the release process in various TLP's of which am a part. The
> typical procedure is:
>
> 1) Try very hard to sort out any possible problems.
> 2) Run maven-release-plugin. This creates a tag named after the
> proposed release (e.g. cxf-2.4).
> 3) Start vote.
> 3) If awful turns up, delete tag, goto 1.
>
> The problem is that maven metadata captures the actual svn path, so if
> you try to take the '-rcn and rename' you end up with poms with the
> wrong svn tags in them. So we're all stuck with not-quite-immutable
> tags.
It's still possible to have immutable tags for votes.
Tomcat creates tags of the form 7.0.n.
If the vote succeeds, good, then the code is released.
If not, then abandon the tag entirely, and restart with 7.0.n+1
Yes, it leaves occasional gaps in the release versions, but it is very
simple to operate.
[I think httpd do the same]
But if you don't want to do that, it's still possible to create a tag
with the -RCn suffix but the correct entries in the poms.
It may not be possible to do this using the Maven Release plugin, but
I don't use it so I don't know.
I create a clean workspace from trunk, edit poms to fix up version and
SVN URLs and then create the tag directly from the workspace.
The workspace is then ready to use to build the release candidate.
This leaves the trunk as a snapshot, as well being safer than working
from the local trunk workspace, which might contain spurious files.
If all else fails, make sure that the release vote includes the SVN
revision, because at least SVN revision + tag is immutable.
>>>
>>> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
>>> when the vote succeeds.
>>>
>>> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
>>>
>>> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
>>>
>>> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
>>>
>>> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Tag replaced.
>>> >
>>> > A.
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> > New candidate up at
>>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>>> .
>>> >> The
>>> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging
>>> >> files
>>> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
>>> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
>>> excluded
>>> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been
>>> >> built
>>> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>>> >>
>>> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>>> >>
>>> >> > A.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
>>> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>>> >> >wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
>>> >> tarball
>>> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS
>>> X -
>>> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
>>> the
>>> >> files
>>> >> >> missing headers today as well.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> A.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>>> >> >>> list](
>>> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>>> >> >>> or [developer list](
>>> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please
>>> >> find
>>> >> >>> RC1
>>> >> >>> >> at
>>> >> >>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>>> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> > No sign yet.
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> >> A.
>>> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>>> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>>> >> >>> >wrote:
>>> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
>>> files -
>>> >> >>> I'll
>>> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the
>>> >> ones
>>> >> >>> that
>>> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>>> >> >>> >>>
>>> >> >>> >>> A.
>>> >> >>> >>>
>>> >> >>> >>>
>>> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>>> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>>> >> >>> >wrote:
>>> >> >>> >>>
>>> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are
>>> some
>>> >> >>> files
>>> >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
>>> >> they're
>>> >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments,
>>> etc
>>> >> -
>>> >> >>> these
>>> >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
>>> >> >>> something.
>>> >> >>> >>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything
>>> is
>>> >> >>> under
>>> >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in
>>> >> SVN,
>>> >> >>> same
>>> >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
>>> >> >>> built/used,
>>> >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there
>>> >> are
>>> >> >>> any
>>> >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check
>>> it
>>> >> >>> out.
>>> >> >>> >>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>>> >> >>> >>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>> A.
>>> >> >>> >>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>> >>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> >> >>> wrote:
>>> >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop,
>>> version
>>> >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>>> >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>>> >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24
>>> (3
>>> >> >>> working
>>> >> >>> >>>>> days
>>> >> >>> >>>>> > from now)
>>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>>> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>>> >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>>> >> >>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>>> >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added
>>> to
>>> >> SVN
>>> >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the
>>> >> bigtop
>>> >> >>> >>>>> website.
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal
>>> (not
>>> >> a
>>> >> >>> >>>>> blocker).
>>> >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
>>> >> "developed
>>> >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be
>>> >> left
>>> >> >>> >>>>> dangling.
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the
>>> >> source
>>> >> >>> >>>>> release.
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive
>>> - I
>>> >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>>> >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel
>>> directories
>>> >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to
>>> >> check
>>> >> >>> the
>>> >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
>>> >> >>> release:
>>> >> >>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release
>>> after
>>> >> a
>>> >> >>> >>>>> successful
>>> >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>>> >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
>>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>>> >> >>> >>>>> > A.
>>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>>
>>> >> >>> >>>
>>> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
>
> A.
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
Two points here.
1) It's a bad idea to do serious QA only as part of a release vote. It
leads to a lot of noise and duplicated effort. Some of what led to a
respin here could have been tested for before starting a vote.
2) Sebb, I'm sorry to point out that labels are frequently mutated as
part of the release process in various TLP's of which am a part. The
typical procedure is:
1) Try very hard to sort out any possible problems.
2) Run maven-release-plugin. This creates a tag named after the
proposed release (e.g. cxf-2.4).
3) Start vote.
3) If awful turns up, delete tag, goto 1.
The problem is that maven metadata captures the actual svn path, so if
you try to take the '-rcn and rename' you end up with poms with the
wrong svn tags in them. So we're all stuck with not-quite-immutable
tags.
>>
>> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
>> when the vote succeeds.
>>
>> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
>>
>> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
>>
>> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
>>
>> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Tag replaced.
>> >
>> > A.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > New candidate up at
>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>> .
>> >> The
>> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging
>> >> files
>> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
>> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
>> excluded
>> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been
>> >> built
>> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>> >> >
>> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>> >>
>> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>> >>
>> >> > A.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
>> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
>> >> tarball
>> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS
>> X -
>> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
>> the
>> >> files
>> >> >> missing headers today as well.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> A.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>> >> >>> list](
>> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>> >> >>> or [developer list](
>> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please
>> >> find
>> >> >>> RC1
>> >> >>> >> at
>> >> >>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > No sign yet.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> A.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
>> files -
>> >> >>> I'll
>> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the
>> >> ones
>> >> >>> that
>> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> A.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are
>> some
>> >> >>> files
>> >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
>> >> they're
>> >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments,
>> etc
>> >> -
>> >> >>> these
>> >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
>> >> >>> something.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything
>> is
>> >> >>> under
>> >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in
>> >> SVN,
>> >> >>> same
>> >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
>> >> >>> built/used,
>> >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there
>> >> are
>> >> >>> any
>> >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check
>> it
>> >> >>> out.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>> A.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop,
>> version
>> >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24
>> (3
>> >> >>> working
>> >> >>> >>>>> days
>> >> >>> >>>>> > from now)
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>> >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added
>> to
>> >> SVN
>> >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the
>> >> bigtop
>> >> >>> >>>>> website.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal
>> (not
>> >> a
>> >> >>> >>>>> blocker).
>> >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
>> >> "developed
>> >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be
>> >> left
>> >> >>> >>>>> dangling.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the
>> >> source
>> >> >>> >>>>> release.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive
>> - I
>> >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>> >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel
>> directories
>> >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to
>> >> check
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
>> >> >>> release:
>> >> >>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release
>> after
>> >> a
>> >> >>> >>>>> successful
>> >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > A.
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
This thread has got rather long and complicated.
May I suggest creating a new thread (i.e. not a reply) with just the
details required for the new vote?
Change the subject to include RC2 please.
Thanks!
On 22 August 2011 16:26, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
>
> A.
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
>>
>> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
>> when the vote succeeds.
>>
>> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
>>
>> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
>>
>> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
>>
>> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Tag replaced.
>> >
>> > A.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > New candidate up at
>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>> .
>> >> The
>> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging
>> >> files
>> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
>> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
>> excluded
>> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been
>> >> built
>> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>> >> >
>> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>> >>
>> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>> >>
>> >> > A.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
>> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
>> >> tarball
>> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS
>> X -
>> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
>> the
>> >> files
>> >> >> missing headers today as well.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> A.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>> >> >>> list](
>> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>> >> >>> or [developer list](
>> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please
>> >> find
>> >> >>> RC1
>> >> >>> >> at
>> >> >>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > No sign yet.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> A.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
>> files -
>> >> >>> I'll
>> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the
>> >> ones
>> >> >>> that
>> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> A.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are
>> some
>> >> >>> files
>> >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
>> >> they're
>> >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments,
>> etc
>> >> -
>> >> >>> these
>> >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
>> >> >>> something.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything
>> is
>> >> >>> under
>> >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in
>> >> SVN,
>> >> >>> same
>> >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
>> >> >>> built/used,
>> >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there
>> >> are
>> >> >>> any
>> >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check
>> it
>> >> >>> out.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>> A.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop,
>> version
>> >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24
>> (3
>> >> >>> working
>> >> >>> >>>>> days
>> >> >>> >>>>> > from now)
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>> >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added
>> to
>> >> SVN
>> >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the
>> >> bigtop
>> >> >>> >>>>> website.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal
>> (not
>> >> a
>> >> >>> >>>>> blocker).
>> >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
>> >> "developed
>> >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be
>> >> left
>> >> >>> >>>>> dangling.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the
>> >> source
>> >> >>> >>>>> release.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive
>> - I
>> >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>> >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel
>> directories
>> >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to
>> >> check
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
>> >> >>> release:
>> >> >>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release
>> after
>> >> a
>> >> >>> >>>>> successful
>> >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > A.
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
>
> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
> when the vote succeeds.
>
> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
>
> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
>
> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
>
> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Tag replaced.
> >
> > A.
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > New candidate up at
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
> .
> >> The
> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging
> >> files
> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
> excluded
> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been
> >> built
> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
> >> >
> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
> >>
> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
> >>
> >> > A.
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
> >> tarball
> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS
> X -
> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
> the
> >> files
> >> >> missing headers today as well.
> >> >>
> >> >> A.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
> >> >>> list](
> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
> >> >>> or [developer list](
> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please
> >> find
> >> >>> RC1
> >> >>> >> at
> >> >>>
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > No sign yet.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> A.
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
> files -
> >> >>> I'll
> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the
> >> ones
> >> >>> that
> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> A.
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are
> some
> >> >>> files
> >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
> >> they're
> >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments,
> etc
> >> -
> >> >>> these
> >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
> >> >>> something.
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything
> is
> >> >>> under
> >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in
> >> SVN,
> >> >>> same
> >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
> >> >>> built/used,
> >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there
> >> are
> >> >>> any
> >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check
> it
> >> >>> out.
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>> A.
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop,
> version
> >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24
> (3
> >> >>> working
> >> >>> >>>>> days
> >> >>> >>>>> > from now)
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>>
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
> >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added
> to
> >> SVN
> >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the
> >> bigtop
> >> >>> >>>>> website.
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal
> (not
> >> a
> >> >>> >>>>> blocker).
> >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
> >> "developed
> >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be
> >> left
> >> >>> >>>>> dangling.
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the
> >> source
> >> >>> >>>>> release.
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive
> - I
> >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
> >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel
> directories
> >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to
> >> check
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
> >> >>> release:
> >> >>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release
> after
> >> a
> >> >>> >>>>> successful
> >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>> > A.
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
>
> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
> when the vote succeeds.
>
> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
>
> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
>
> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
>
> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Tag replaced.
> >
> > A.
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > New candidate up at
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
> .
> >> The
> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging
> >> files
> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
> excluded
> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been
> >> built
> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
> >> >
> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
> >>
> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
> >>
> >> > A.
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
> >> tarball
> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS
> X -
> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
> the
> >> files
> >> >> missing headers today as well.
> >> >>
> >> >> A.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
> >> >>> list](
> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
> >> >>> or [developer list](
> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please
> >> find
> >> >>> RC1
> >> >>> >> at
> >> >>>
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > No sign yet.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> A.
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
> files -
> >> >>> I'll
> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the
> >> ones
> >> >>> that
> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> A.
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are
> some
> >> >>> files
> >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
> >> they're
> >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments,
> etc
> >> -
> >> >>> these
> >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
> >> >>> something.
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything
> is
> >> >>> under
> >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in
> >> SVN,
> >> >>> same
> >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
> >> >>> built/used,
> >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there
> >> are
> >> >>> any
> >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check
> it
> >> >>> out.
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>> A.
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop,
> version
> >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24
> (3
> >> >>> working
> >> >>> >>>>> days
> >> >>> >>>>> > from now)
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>>
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
> >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added
> to
> >> SVN
> >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the
> >> bigtop
> >> >>> >>>>> website.
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal
> (not
> >> a
> >> >>> >>>>> blocker).
> >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
> >> "developed
> >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be
> >> left
> >> >>> >>>>> dangling.
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the
> >> source
> >> >>> >>>>> release.
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive
> - I
> >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
> >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel
> directories
> >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to
> >> check
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
> >> >>> release:
> >> >>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release
> after
> >> a
> >> >>> >>>>> successful
> >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>> > A.
> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
Tags are supposed to be immutable.
For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
when the vote succeeds.
Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
[BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tag replaced.
>
> A.
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > New candidate up at
>> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/.
>> The
>> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging
>> files
>> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
>> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now, excluded
>> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been
>> built
>> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>> >
>> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>>
>> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>>
>> > A.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
>> tarball
>> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS X -
>> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get the
>> files
>> >> missing headers today as well.
>> >>
>> >> A.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>> >>>
>> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>> >>> list](
>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>> >>> or [developer list](
>> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>> >>>
>> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>> >>>
>> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>> >>>
>> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please
>> find
>> >>> RC1
>> >>> >> at
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > No sign yet.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> A.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >>> >wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files -
>> >>> I'll
>> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the
>> ones
>> >>> that
>> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> A.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >>> >wrote:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some
>> >>> files
>> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
>> they're
>> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc
>> -
>> >>> these
>> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
>> >>> something.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is
>> >>> under
>> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in
>> SVN,
>> >>> same
>> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
>> >>> built/used,
>> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there
>> are
>> >>> any
>> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it
>> >>> out.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> A.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3
>> >>> working
>> >>> >>>>> days
>> >>> >>>>> > from now)
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to
>> SVN
>> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the
>> bigtop
>> >>> >>>>> website.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not
>> a
>> >>> >>>>> blocker).
>> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
>> "developed
>> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be
>> left
>> >>> >>>>> dangling.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the
>> source
>> >>> >>>>> release.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
>> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
>> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to
>> check
>> >>> the
>> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
>> >>> release:
>> >>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after
>> a
>> >>> >>>>> successful
>> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > A.
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
Tags are supposed to be immutable.
For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
when the vote succeeds.
Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
[BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tag replaced.
>
> A.
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > New candidate up at
>> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/.
>> The
>> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging
>> files
>> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
>> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now, excluded
>> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been
>> built
>> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>> >
>> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>>
>> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>>
>> > A.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
>> tarball
>> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS X -
>> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get the
>> files
>> >> missing headers today as well.
>> >>
>> >> A.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>> >>>
>> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>> >>> list](
>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>> >>> or [developer list](
>> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>> >>>
>> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>> >>>
>> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>> >>>
>> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please
>> find
>> >>> RC1
>> >>> >> at
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > No sign yet.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> A.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >>> >wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files -
>> >>> I'll
>> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the
>> ones
>> >>> that
>> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> A.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >>> >wrote:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some
>> >>> files
>> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
>> they're
>> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc
>> -
>> >>> these
>> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
>> >>> something.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is
>> >>> under
>> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in
>> SVN,
>> >>> same
>> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
>> >>> built/used,
>> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there
>> are
>> >>> any
>> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it
>> >>> out.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> A.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3
>> >>> working
>> >>> >>>>> days
>> >>> >>>>> > from now)
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to
>> SVN
>> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the
>> bigtop
>> >>> >>>>> website.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not
>> a
>> >>> >>>>> blocker).
>> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
>> "developed
>> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be
>> left
>> >>> >>>>> dangling.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the
>> source
>> >>> >>>>> release.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
>> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
>> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to
>> check
>> >>> the
>> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
>> >>> release:
>> >>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after
>> a
>> >>> >>>>> successful
>> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > A.
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Tag replaced.
A.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > New candidate up at
> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/.
> The
> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging
> files
> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now, excluded
> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been
> built
> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
> >
> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>
> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>
> > A.
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
> tarball
> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS X -
> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get the
> files
> >> missing headers today as well.
> >>
> >> A.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
> >>>
> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
> >>> list](
> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
> >>> or [developer list](
> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
> >>>
> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
> >>>
> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
> >>>
> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please
> find
> >>> RC1
> >>> >> at
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
> >>> >
> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
> >>> >
> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
> >>> >
> >>> > No sign yet.
> >>> >
> >>> >> A.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >>> >wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files -
> >>> I'll
> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the
> ones
> >>> that
> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> A.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >>> >wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some
> >>> files
> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
> they're
> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc
> -
> >>> these
> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
> >>> something.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is
> >>> under
> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in
> SVN,
> >>> same
> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
> >>> built/used,
> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there
> are
> >>> any
> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it
> >>> out.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> A.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3
> >>> working
> >>> >>>>> days
> >>> >>>>> > from now)
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to
> SVN
> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the
> bigtop
> >>> >>>>> website.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not
> a
> >>> >>>>> blocker).
> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
> "developed
> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be
> left
> >>> >>>>> dangling.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the
> source
> >>> >>>>> release.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to
> check
> >>> the
> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
> >>> release:
> >>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after
> a
> >>> >>>>> successful
> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>> > A.
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Tag replaced.
A.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > New candidate up at
> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/.
> The
> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging
> files
> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now, excluded
> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been
> built
> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
> >
> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>
> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>
> > A.
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
> tarball
> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS X -
> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get the
> files
> >> missing headers today as well.
> >>
> >> A.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
> >>>
> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
> >>> list](
> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
> >>> or [developer list](
> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
> >>>
> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
> >>>
> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
> >>>
> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please
> find
> >>> RC1
> >>> >> at
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
> >>> >
> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
> >>> >
> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
> >>> >
> >>> > No sign yet.
> >>> >
> >>> >> A.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >>> >wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files -
> >>> I'll
> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the
> ones
> >>> that
> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> A.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >>> >wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some
> >>> files
> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
> they're
> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc
> -
> >>> these
> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
> >>> something.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is
> >>> under
> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in
> SVN,
> >>> same
> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
> >>> built/used,
> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there
> are
> >>> any
> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it
> >>> out.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> A.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3
> >>> working
> >>> >>>>> days
> >>> >>>>> > from now)
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to
> SVN
> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the
> bigtop
> >>> >>>>> website.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not
> a
> >>> >>>>> blocker).
> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after
> "developed
> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be
> left
> >>> >>>>> dangling.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the
> source
> >>> >>>>> release.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to
> check
> >>> the
> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
> >>> release:
> >>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after
> a
> >>> >>>>> successful
> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>> > A.
> >>> >>>>> >
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> New candidate up at
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/. The
> only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging files
> that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
> replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now, excluded
> from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been built
> with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>
> Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
> A.
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The tarball
>> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS X -
>> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get the files
>> missing headers today as well.
>>
>> A.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>>>
>>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>>> list](https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>>> or [developer list](
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>>>
>>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>>>
>>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>>>
>>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find
>>> RC1
>>> >> at
>>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>>> >
>>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
>>> >
>>> >> Website should update shortly.
>>> >
>>> > No sign yet.
>>> >
>>> >> A.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>>> >wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files -
>>> I'll
>>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones
>>> that
>>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> A.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>>> >wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some
>>> files
>>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're
>>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc -
>>> these
>>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
>>> something.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is
>>> under
>>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN,
>>> same
>>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
>>> built/used,
>>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are
>>> any
>>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it
>>> out.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> A.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3
>>> working
>>> >>>>> days
>>> >>>>> > from now)
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>>> >>>>> >
>>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN
>>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop
>>> >>>>> website.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a
>>> >>>>> blocker).
>>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
>>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
>>> >>>>> dangling.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source
>>> >>>>> release.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
>>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
>>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check
>>> the
>>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
>>> release:
>>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> sig is OK
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
>>> >>>>> successful
>>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> > Thanks!
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> > A.
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> New candidate up at
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/. The
> only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging files
> that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
> replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now, excluded
> from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been built
> with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>
> Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
> A.
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The tarball
>> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS X -
>> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get the files
>> missing headers today as well.
>>
>> A.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>>>
>>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>>> list](https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>>> or [developer list](
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>>>
>>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>>>
>>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>>>
>>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find
>>> RC1
>>> >> at
>>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>>> >
>>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
>>> >
>>> >> Website should update shortly.
>>> >
>>> > No sign yet.
>>> >
>>> >> A.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>>> >wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files -
>>> I'll
>>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones
>>> that
>>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> A.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>>> >wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some
>>> files
>>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're
>>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc -
>>> these
>>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
>>> something.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is
>>> under
>>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN,
>>> same
>>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
>>> built/used,
>>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are
>>> any
>>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it
>>> out.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> A.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3
>>> working
>>> >>>>> days
>>> >>>>> > from now)
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>>> >>>>> >
>>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN
>>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop
>>> >>>>> website.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a
>>> >>>>> blocker).
>>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
>>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
>>> >>>>> dangling.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source
>>> >>>>> release.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
>>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
>>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check
>>> the
>>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
>>> release:
>>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> sig is OK
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
>>> >>>>> successful
>>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> > Thanks!
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> > A.
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
New candidate up at
http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/. The
only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging files
that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now, excluded
from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been built
with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
A.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The tarball
> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS X -
> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get the files
> missing headers today as well.
>
> A.
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>>
>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>> list](https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>> or [developer list](
>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>>
>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>>
>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>>
>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find
>> RC1
>> >> at
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>> >
>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
>> >
>> >> Website should update shortly.
>> >
>> > No sign yet.
>> >
>> >> A.
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files -
>> I'll
>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones
>> that
>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>> >>>
>> >>> A.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some
>> files
>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're
>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc -
>> these
>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
>> something.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is
>> under
>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN,
>> same
>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
>> built/used,
>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are
>> any
>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it
>> out.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> A.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3
>> working
>> >>>>> days
>> >>>>> > from now)
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> >>>>> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN
>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop
>> >>>>> website.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a
>> >>>>> blocker).
>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
>> >>>>> dangling.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source
>> >>>>> release.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check
>> the
>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
>> release:
>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> sig is OK
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
>> >>>>> successful
>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Thanks!
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > A.
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
New candidate up at
http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/. The
only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging files
that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now, excluded
from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been built
with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
A.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The tarball
> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS X -
> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get the files
> missing headers today as well.
>
> A.
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>>
>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>> list](https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>> or [developer list](
>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>>
>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>>
>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>>
>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find
>> RC1
>> >> at
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>> >
>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
>> >
>> >> Website should update shortly.
>> >
>> > No sign yet.
>> >
>> >> A.
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files -
>> I'll
>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones
>> that
>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>> >>>
>> >>> A.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some
>> files
>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're
>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc -
>> these
>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
>> something.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is
>> under
>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN,
>> same
>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
>> built/used,
>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are
>> any
>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it
>> out.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> A.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3
>> working
>> >>>>> days
>> >>>>> > from now)
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> >>>>> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN
>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop
>> >>>>> website.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a
>> >>>>> blocker).
>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
>> >>>>> dangling.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source
>> >>>>> release.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check
>> the
>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
>> release:
>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> sig is OK
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
>> >>>>> successful
>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Thanks!
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > A.
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The tarball
contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS X -
I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get the files
missing headers today as well.
A.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>
> You can get in touch with us on the [user
> list](https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
> or [developer list](
> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>
> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>
> Why is this not a .txt file?
>
> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find
> RC1
> >> at
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
> >
> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
> >
> >> Website should update shortly.
> >
> > No sign yet.
> >
> >> A.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files -
> I'll
> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones
> that
> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
> >>>
> >>> A.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some
> files
> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're
> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc -
> these
> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
> something.
> >>>>
> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is under
> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN,
> same
> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
> built/used,
> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are
> any
> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it out.
> >>>>
> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
> >>>>
> >>>> A.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3
> working
> >>>>> days
> >>>>> > from now)
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> >>>>> >
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN
> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop
> >>>>> website.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a
> >>>>> blocker).
> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
> >>>>> dangling.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source
> >>>>> release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check
> the
> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
> release:
> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >>>>>
> >>>>> sig is OK
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
> >>>>> successful
> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Thanks!
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > A.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
You can get in touch with us on the [user
list](https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
or [developer list](https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
This also needs to be fixed before release.
Why is this not a .txt file?
On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find RC1
>> at http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>
> NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
>
>> Website should update shortly.
>
> No sign yet.
>
>> A.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files - I'll
>>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones that
>>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>>>
>>> A.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some files
>>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're
>>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc - these
>>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing something.
>>>>
>>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is under
>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN, same
>>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being built/used,
>>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are any
>>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it out.
>>>>
>>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>>>>
>>>> A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>>>>> >
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>>>>> >
>>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working
>>>>> days
>>>>> > from now)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>>>>>
>>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN
>>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>>>>>
>>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop
>>>>> website.
>>>>>
>>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>>>>>
>>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a
>>>>> blocker).
>>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
>>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
>>>>> dangling.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source
>>>>> release.
>>>>>
>>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
>>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
>>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check the
>>>>> archive against the source archive.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>>>>>
>>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>>>>> >
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>>>>>
>>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
>>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>> sig is OK
>>>>>
>>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
>>>>> successful
>>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks!
>>>>> >
>>>>> > A.
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find RC1
> at http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
> Website should update shortly.
No sign yet.
> A.
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files - I'll
>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones that
>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>>
>> A.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some files
>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're
>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc - these
>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing something.
>>>
>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is under
>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN, same
>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being built/used,
>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are any
>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it out.
>>>
>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>>>
>>> A.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>>>> >
>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>>>> >
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>>>> >
>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working
>>>> days
>>>> > from now)
>>>> >
>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>>>> >
>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>>>>
>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN
>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>>>>
>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop
>>>> website.
>>>>
>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>>>>
>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a
>>>> blocker).
>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
>>>> dangling.
>>>>
>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check the
>>>> archive against the source archive.
>>>>
>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>>>>
>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>>>> >
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>>>>
>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> sig is OK
>>>>
>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
>>>> successful
>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks!
>>>> >
>>>> > A.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find RC1
at http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
Website should update shortly.
A.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files - I'll
> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones that
> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>
> A.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some files
>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're
>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc - these
>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing something.
>>
>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is under
>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN, same
>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being built/used,
>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are any
>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it out.
>>
>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>>
>> A.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>>> >
>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>>> >
>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working
>>> days
>>> > from now)
>>> >
>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>>> >
>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>>>
>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN
>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>>>
>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop
>>> website.
>>>
>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>>>
>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a
>>> blocker).
>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
>>> dangling.
>>>
>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source
>>> release.
>>>
>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check the
>>> archive against the source archive.
>>>
>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>>>
>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>>> >
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>>>
>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>>>
>>> sig is OK
>>>
>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
>>> successful
>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!
>>> >
>>> > A.
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find RC1
at http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
Website should update shortly.
A.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files - I'll
> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones that
> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>
> A.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some files
>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're
>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc - these
>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing something.
>>
>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is under
>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN, same
>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being built/used,
>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are any
>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it out.
>>
>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>>
>> A.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>>> >
>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>>> >
>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working
>>> days
>>> > from now)
>>> >
>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>>> >
>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>>>
>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN
>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>>>
>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop
>>> website.
>>>
>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>>>
>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a
>>> blocker).
>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
>>> dangling.
>>>
>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source
>>> release.
>>>
>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check the
>>> archive against the source archive.
>>>
>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>>>
>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>>> >
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>>>
>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>>>
>>> sig is OK
>>>
>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
>>> successful
>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!
>>> >
>>> > A.
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files - I'll
open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones that
show up deeper are expected by the build process.
A.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some files
> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're
> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc - these
> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing something.
>
> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is under
> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN, same
> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being built/used,
> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are any
> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it out.
>
> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>
> A.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >
>> > It fixes the following issues:
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >
>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working
>> days
>> > from now)
>> >
>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >
>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>>
>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN
>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>>
>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop
>> website.
>>
>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>>
>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a
>> blocker).
>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
>> dangling.
>>
>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source
>> release.
>>
>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check the
>> archive against the source archive.
>>
>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>>
>> > The tag to be voted on:
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>>
>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>>
>> sig is OK
>>
>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
>> successful
>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > A.
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 19 August 2011 22:58, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some files
> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're
> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc - these
> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing something.
There are several shell scripts, e.g.
hadoop-pig.postinst
hadoop-pig.preinst
src/pkg/deb/pig/rules
Other files that could and should have AL headers:
*.apt
SQL scripts such as
test/src/smokes/hive/src/test/resources/scripts/integration/hbase_joins/in
(it would not harm to include a description as well)
There may be others. I suggest running RAT to produce a report.
> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is under
> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN, same
> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being built/used,
> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are any
> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it out.
There seems to a problem with reading the tar file using Winzip (and
in fact with Ant as well, which is what I use normally for
command-line unpacking). Some of the paths are missing some leading
segments.
I just tried using 7-Zip and that worked fine.
The archive matches the SVN tag once the unpacking is sorted out.
What exact command did you use to create the tar file?
It's clearly creating a file that confuses Winzip and Ant.
Maybe you can try using Ant to unpack the archive and see if you see
the same behaviour:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<project name="unpack" default="unpack" basedir=".">
<property name="name" value="bigtop-0.1.0-incubating"/>
<target name="unpack">
<gunzip src="${name}.tar.gz" dest="${name}.tar"/>
<untar src="${name}.tar" dest="${name}.tar-tgz"/>
<delete file="${name}.tar"/>
</target>
</project>
I'm using Ant 1.8.2 on WinXP
> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>
> A.
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >
>> > It fixes the following issues:
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >
>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working
>> days
>> > from now)
>> >
>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >
>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>>
>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN
>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>>
>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop
>> website.
>>
>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>>
>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a
>> blocker).
>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
>> dangling.
>>
>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source
>> release.
>>
>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check the
>> archive against the source archive.
>>
>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>>
>> > The tag to be voted on:
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>>
>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>>
>> sig is OK
>>
>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
>> successful
>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > A.
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files - I'll
open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones that
show up deeper are expected by the build process.
A.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some files
> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're
> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc - these
> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing something.
>
> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is under
> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN, same
> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being built/used,
> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are any
> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it out.
>
> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>
> A.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >
>> > It fixes the following issues:
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >
>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working
>> days
>> > from now)
>> >
>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >
>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>>
>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN
>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>>
>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop
>> website.
>>
>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>>
>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a
>> blocker).
>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
>> dangling.
>>
>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source
>> release.
>>
>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check the
>> archive against the source archive.
>>
>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>>
>> > The tag to be voted on:
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>>
>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>>
>> sig is OK
>>
>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
>> successful
>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > A.
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 19 August 2011 22:58, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some files
> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're
> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc - these
> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing something.
There are several shell scripts, e.g.
hadoop-pig.postinst
hadoop-pig.preinst
src/pkg/deb/pig/rules
Other files that could and should have AL headers:
*.apt
SQL scripts such as
test/src/smokes/hive/src/test/resources/scripts/integration/hbase_joins/in
(it would not harm to include a description as well)
There may be others. I suggest running RAT to produce a report.
> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is under
> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN, same
> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being built/used,
> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are any
> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it out.
There seems to a problem with reading the tar file using Winzip (and
in fact with Ant as well, which is what I use normally for
command-line unpacking). Some of the paths are missing some leading
segments.
I just tried using 7-Zip and that worked fine.
The archive matches the SVN tag once the unpacking is sorted out.
What exact command did you use to create the tar file?
It's clearly creating a file that confuses Winzip and Ant.
Maybe you can try using Ant to unpack the archive and see if you see
the same behaviour:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<project name="unpack" default="unpack" basedir=".">
<property name="name" value="bigtop-0.1.0-incubating"/>
<target name="unpack">
<gunzip src="${name}.tar.gz" dest="${name}.tar"/>
<untar src="${name}.tar" dest="${name}.tar-tgz"/>
<delete file="${name}.tar"/>
</target>
</project>
I'm using Ant 1.8.2 on WinXP
> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>
> A.
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >
>> > It fixes the following issues:
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >
>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working
>> days
>> > from now)
>> >
>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >
>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>>
>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN
>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>>
>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop
>> website.
>>
>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>>
>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a
>> blocker).
>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
>> dangling.
>>
>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source
>> release.
>>
>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check the
>> archive against the source archive.
>>
>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>>
>> > The tag to be voted on:
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>>
>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>>
>> sig is OK
>>
>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
>> successful
>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > A.
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some files
without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're
expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc - these
should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing something.
As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is under
bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN, same
layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being built/used,
and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are any
inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it out.
Adding DISCLAIMER now.
A.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >
> > It fixes the following issues:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >
> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working
> days
> > from now)
> >
> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >
> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>
> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN
> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>
> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop
> website.
>
> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>
> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a
> blocker).
> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
> dangling.
>
> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source
> release.
>
> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check the
> archive against the source archive.
>
> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>
> > The tag to be voted on:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>
> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>
> sig is OK
>
> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
> successful
> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > A.
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some files
without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're
expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc - these
should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing something.
As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is under
bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN, same
layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being built/used,
and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are any
inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it out.
Adding DISCLAIMER now.
A.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >
> > It fixes the following issues:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >
> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working
> days
> > from now)
> >
> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >
> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>
> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN
> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>
> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop
> website.
>
> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>
> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a
> blocker).
> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
> dangling.
>
> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source
> release.
>
> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check the
> archive against the source archive.
>
> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>
> > The tag to be voted on:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>
> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>
> sig is OK
>
> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
> successful
> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > A.
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.1.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>
> *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working days
> from now)
>
> Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>
> Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN
alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop website.
IMO these must be fixed before a release.
The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a blocker).
It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
dangling.
I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source release.
There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I
would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check the
archive against the source archive.
Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
> The tag to be voted on:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
> Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
sig is OK
> Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a successful
> PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>
> Thanks!
>
> A.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org>.
My last patch for centos5 broke openSUSE/Mageia (here lies the troubles
of having different set of VMs at home and at work).
I am booting up right now a bunch of VMs to ensure next patch won't
break anything.
Could we re-cut a rc after that patch?
On 08/19/2011 11:25 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.1.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>
> *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working days
> from now)
>
> Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>
> Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>
> The tag to be voted on:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>
> Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>
> Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a successful
> PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>
> Thanks!
>
> A.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org