[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-1685) Oozie doesn’t process correctly workflows with a non-default name node

["Benjamin Zhitomirsky (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13957797#comment-13957797 ] 

Benjamin Zhitomirsky commented on OOZIE-1685:
---------------------------------------------

CR is here: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19929/

> Oozie doesn’t process correctly workflows with a non-default name node
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-1685
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1685
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: trunk, 3.3.2, 4.0.0
>         Environment: Any
>            Reporter: Benjamin Zhitomirsky
>             Fix For: trunk
>
>         Attachments: Design of the fix OOZIE-1685-rev1.docx, oozie-1685-trunk.patch, oozie-1685-trunk.patch, oozie-1685-trunk.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 168h
>  Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> When <name-node> element in Oozie workflow specifies a name node different from the default one (specified in core-site.xml), the following functionality doesn’t work properly:
> - Location of libraries specified via oozie.service.WorkflowAppService.system.libpath. Oozie first (during launcher configuration) tries to locate them using name node specified by the <name-node> element, but later during job submission it expects this path to be under the default Oozie name node 
> - Processing of the job-xml element if job xml is specified via absolute path. Oozie tries locate it under the default Oozie name node instead of the name-node specified in action.
> Specifying non-default name node makes a lot of sense in Azure environment, because it allows to submit the same job to different Hadoop clusters.
> I will submit a fix for CR soon. Please refer attached short document for more information.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)