You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Michael Dürig (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/11/13 17:43:21 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-1178) MutableTree#isNew: replace implementation by NodeBuilder#isNew

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13821506#comment-13821506 ] 

Michael Dürig commented on OAK-1178:
------------------------------------

This is probably caused by some of the {{NodeBuilder}} implementations not preserving the status across rebase operations. Added a test case for {{KernelNodeBuilder}} at http://svn.apache.org/r1541601

> MutableTree#isNew: replace implementation by NodeBuilder#isNew 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-1178
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1178
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: angela
>            Assignee: Jukka Zitting
>             Fix For: 0.12
>
>         Attachments: OAK-1178.patch
>
>
> Similar to the issue described in OAK-1177 we may consider replacing the implementation of MutableTree#isNew by the corresponding call on the NodeBuilder.
> See also OAK-947.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)