You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@perl.apache.org by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org> on 2004/09/04 01:24:07 UTC
Re: Fw: Re: Unable to set sockets to non blocking on OpenBSD
Ken Simpson wrote:
> Hi Stas,
> The APR patch to fix nonblocking sockets on OpenBSD has been applied:
Thanks Ken.
Is it in the upcoming 2.0.51? In which case we may need to subject tests
to skip on OpenBSD && apache_version < 2.0.51?
> ----- Forwarded message from Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com> -----
>
> From: Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com>
> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:33:14 +0100
> To: Ken Simpson <ks...@larch.mailchannels.com>
> Subject: Re: Unable to set sockets to non blocking on OpenBSD
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:20:30AM -0700, Ken Simpson wrote:
>
>>Hi Joe,
>>This patch definitely works. What do I need to do to ensure that the
>>patch is applied to APR? BTW, I have signed an Apache Foundation
>>contributors' agreement.
>
>
> Thanks for testing it out. The patch has already been applied for the
> next 0.9.x and 1.0.x releases.
>
> joe
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: Fw: Re: Unable to set sockets to non blocking on OpenBSD
Posted by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org>.
Ken Simpson wrote:
> The APR_0_9_4 branch contains the patch.
> Where do I get the 2.0.51 release candidate tar?
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.0.51-rc2.tar.gz
> TTUL
> Ken
>
> Stas Bekman [03/09/04 21:15 -0400]:
>
>>Ken Simpson wrote:
>>
>>>>Is it in the upcoming 2.0.51? In which case we may need to subject tests
>>>>to skip on OpenBSD && apache_version < 2.0.51?
>>>
>>>
>>>The APR CVS tree has been updated. Since there hasn't yet been an
>>>Apache 2.0.51 tag applied, I can't say for sure that it's part of
>>>2.0.51. If the standard is to use the HEAD APR library, then it will
>>>definitely be in 2.0.51. Do you know what their policy is for building
>>>the Apache distribution tar ball?
>>
>>No, 2.0.x uses APR_0_9_BRANCH branch. Simply check the 2.0.51-rc whether
>>it includes the fix or not.
>>
>>
>>>TTUL
>>>Ken
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>----- Forwarded message from Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com> -----
>>>>>
>>>>>From: Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com>
>>>>>Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:33:14 +0100
>>>>>To: Ken Simpson <ks...@larch.mailchannels.com>
>>>>>Subject: Re: Unable to set sockets to non blocking on OpenBSD
>>>>>User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
>>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:20:30AM -0700, Ken Simpson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi Joe,
>>>>>>This patch definitely works. What do I need to do to ensure that the
>>>>>>patch is applied to APR? BTW, I have signed an Apache Foundation
>>>>>>contributors' agreement.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks for testing it out. The patch has already been applied for the
>>>>>next 0.9.x and 1.0.x releases.
>>>>>
>>>>>joe
>>>>>
>>>>>----- End forwarded message -----
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>__________________________________________________________________
>>>>Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
>>>>http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
>>>>mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
>>>>http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>--
>>__________________________________________________________________
>>Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
>>http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
>>mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
>>http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
>>
>
>
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: Fw: Re: Unable to set sockets to non blocking on OpenBSD
Posted by Ken Simpson <ks...@larch.mailchannels.com>.
The APR_0_9_4 branch contains the patch.
Where do I get the 2.0.51 release candidate tar?
TTUL
Ken
Stas Bekman [03/09/04 21:15 -0400]:
> Ken Simpson wrote:
> >>Is it in the upcoming 2.0.51? In which case we may need to subject tests
> >>to skip on OpenBSD && apache_version < 2.0.51?
> >
> >
> >The APR CVS tree has been updated. Since there hasn't yet been an
> >Apache 2.0.51 tag applied, I can't say for sure that it's part of
> >2.0.51. If the standard is to use the HEAD APR library, then it will
> >definitely be in 2.0.51. Do you know what their policy is for building
> >the Apache distribution tar ball?
>
> No, 2.0.x uses APR_0_9_BRANCH branch. Simply check the 2.0.51-rc whether
> it includes the fix or not.
>
> >TTUL
> >Ken
> >
> >
> >>>----- Forwarded message from Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com> -----
> >>>
> >>>From: Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com>
> >>>Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:33:14 +0100
> >>>To: Ken Simpson <ks...@larch.mailchannels.com>
> >>>Subject: Re: Unable to set sockets to non blocking on OpenBSD
> >>>User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
> >>>
> >>>On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:20:30AM -0700, Ken Simpson wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hi Joe,
> >>>>This patch definitely works. What do I need to do to ensure that the
> >>>>patch is applied to APR? BTW, I have signed an Apache Foundation
> >>>>contributors' agreement.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Thanks for testing it out. The patch has already been applied for the
> >>>next 0.9.x and 1.0.x releases.
> >>>
> >>>joe
> >>>
> >>>----- End forwarded message -----
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>__________________________________________________________________
> >>Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
> >>http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
> >>mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
> >>http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> __________________________________________________________________
> Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
> http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
> mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
> http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
>
--
MailChannels: Imagine no more spam
--
http://www.mailchannels.com
MailChannels Corporation
Suite 1600, 1188 West Georgia St.
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Ken Simpson, CEO
+1-604-729-1741
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: Fw: Re: Unable to set sockets to non blocking on OpenBSD
Posted by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org>.
Ken Simpson wrote:
>>Is it in the upcoming 2.0.51? In which case we may need to subject tests
>>to skip on OpenBSD && apache_version < 2.0.51?
>
>
> The APR CVS tree has been updated. Since there hasn't yet been an
> Apache 2.0.51 tag applied, I can't say for sure that it's part of
> 2.0.51. If the standard is to use the HEAD APR library, then it will
> definitely be in 2.0.51. Do you know what their policy is for building
> the Apache distribution tar ball?
No, 2.0.x uses APR_0_9_BRANCH branch. Simply check the 2.0.51-rc whether
it includes the fix or not.
> TTUL
> Ken
>
>
>>>----- Forwarded message from Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com> -----
>>>
>>>From: Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com>
>>>Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:33:14 +0100
>>>To: Ken Simpson <ks...@larch.mailchannels.com>
>>>Subject: Re: Unable to set sockets to non blocking on OpenBSD
>>>User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
>>>
>>>On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:20:30AM -0700, Ken Simpson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi Joe,
>>>>This patch definitely works. What do I need to do to ensure that the
>>>>patch is applied to APR? BTW, I have signed an Apache Foundation
>>>>contributors' agreement.
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks for testing it out. The patch has already been applied for the
>>>next 0.9.x and 1.0.x releases.
>>>
>>>joe
>>>
>>>----- End forwarded message -----
>>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>__________________________________________________________________
>>Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
>>http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
>>mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
>>http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
>
>
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: Fw: Re: Unable to set sockets to non blocking on OpenBSD
Posted by Ken Simpson <ks...@larch.mailchannels.com>.
> Is it in the upcoming 2.0.51? In which case we may need to subject tests
> to skip on OpenBSD && apache_version < 2.0.51?
The APR CVS tree has been updated. Since there hasn't yet been an
Apache 2.0.51 tag applied, I can't say for sure that it's part of
2.0.51. If the standard is to use the HEAD APR library, then it will
definitely be in 2.0.51. Do you know what their policy is for building
the Apache distribution tar ball?
TTUL
Ken
> >----- Forwarded message from Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com> -----
> >
> >From: Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com>
> >Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:33:14 +0100
> >To: Ken Simpson <ks...@larch.mailchannels.com>
> >Subject: Re: Unable to set sockets to non blocking on OpenBSD
> >User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
> >
> >On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:20:30AM -0700, Ken Simpson wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Joe,
> >>This patch definitely works. What do I need to do to ensure that the
> >>patch is applied to APR? BTW, I have signed an Apache Foundation
> >>contributors' agreement.
> >
> >
> >Thanks for testing it out. The patch has already been applied for the
> >next 0.9.x and 1.0.x releases.
> >
> >joe
> >
> >----- End forwarded message -----
> >
>
>
> --
> __________________________________________________________________
> Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
> http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
> mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
> http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--
MailChannels: Imagine no more spam
--
http://www.mailchannels.com
MailChannels Corporation
Suite 1600, 1188 West Georgia St.
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Ken Simpson, CEO
+1-604-729-1741
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org