You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> on 2008/10/03 09:20:33 UTC
[configuration] Configuration-337
My company has recently switched from a proprietary configuration
framework to using Commons Configuration. I will need to submit some
enhancements, the first of which is Configuration 337. I would
appreciate it if someone could review it and apply it. One of the goals
of this patch was to allow new providers to be defined in the
configuration file itself instead of only via a Java api call. This
allows DefaultConfigurationBuilder to be specified as a Spring bean
factory even when custom providers are required.
This patch also allows DefaultConfigurationBuilder to return a class
that extends CombinedConfiguration instead of only a CombinedConfiguration.
Thanks,
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [configuration] Configuration-337
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
Ralph Goers wrote:
> Thanks, Oliver. My ICLA is already on file as I'm an ASF member and a
> committer on several Apache projects already.
>
> Ralph
Oh, that's of course even better :-)
Oliver
>
> Oliver Heger wrote:
>
>> Ralph Goers schrieb:
>>
>>> My company has recently switched from a proprietary configuration
>>> framework to using Commons Configuration. I will need to submit some
>>> enhancements, the first of which is Configuration 337. I would
>>> appreciate it if someone could review it and apply it. One of the
>>> goals of this patch was to allow new providers to be defined in the
>>> configuration file itself instead of only via a Java api call. This
>>> allows DefaultConfigurationBuilder to be specified as a Spring bean
>>> factory even when custom providers are required.
>>> This patch also allows DefaultConfigurationBuilder to return a class
>>> that extends CombinedConfiguration instead of only a
>>> CombinedConfiguration.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ralph
>>>
>> Hi Ralph,
>>
>> it is great that you are willing to contribute to this project. I am
>> happy to review and apply your patches. We can also add you to the
>> contributors section of our team page [1] if you like.
>>
>> If you are going to send further contributions, to be legally on the
>> safe side it would be best if you could send in a "Contributor License
>> Agreement" (CLA). This is especially important if your company is
>> involved, too. Please have a look at [2] where the process is
>> described (the section Contributor License Agreements).
>>
>> Many thanks!
>> Oliver
>>
>> [1] http://commons.apache.org/configuration/team-list.html
>> [2] http://www.apache.org/licenses/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [configuration] Configuration-337
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
Thanks, Oliver. My ICLA is already on file as I'm an ASF member and a
committer on several Apache projects already.
Ralph
Oliver Heger wrote:
> Ralph Goers schrieb:
>> My company has recently switched from a proprietary configuration
>> framework to using Commons Configuration. I will need to submit some
>> enhancements, the first of which is Configuration 337. I would
>> appreciate it if someone could review it and apply it. One of the
>> goals of this patch was to allow new providers to be defined in the
>> configuration file itself instead of only via a Java api call. This
>> allows DefaultConfigurationBuilder to be specified as a Spring bean
>> factory even when custom providers are required.
>> This patch also allows DefaultConfigurationBuilder to return a class
>> that extends CombinedConfiguration instead of only a
>> CombinedConfiguration.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ralph
>>
> Hi Ralph,
>
> it is great that you are willing to contribute to this project. I am
> happy to review and apply your patches. We can also add you to the
> contributors section of our team page [1] if you like.
>
> If you are going to send further contributions, to be legally on the
> safe side it would be best if you could send in a "Contributor License
> Agreement" (CLA). This is especially important if your company is
> involved, too. Please have a look at [2] where the process is
> described (the section Contributor License Agreements).
>
> Many thanks!
> Oliver
>
> [1] http://commons.apache.org/configuration/team-list.html
> [2] http://www.apache.org/licenses/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [configuration] Configuration-337
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
Ralph Goers schrieb:
> My company has recently switched from a proprietary configuration
> framework to using Commons Configuration. I will need to submit some
> enhancements, the first of which is Configuration 337. I would
> appreciate it if someone could review it and apply it. One of the goals
> of this patch was to allow new providers to be defined in the
> configuration file itself instead of only via a Java api call. This
> allows DefaultConfigurationBuilder to be specified as a Spring bean
> factory even when custom providers are required.
> This patch also allows DefaultConfigurationBuilder to return a class
> that extends CombinedConfiguration instead of only a CombinedConfiguration.
>
> Thanks,
> Ralph
>
Hi Ralph,
it is great that you are willing to contribute to this project. I am
happy to review and apply your patches. We can also add you to the
contributors section of our team page [1] if you like.
If you are going to send further contributions, to be legally on the
safe side it would be best if you could send in a "Contributor License
Agreement" (CLA). This is especially important if your company is
involved, too. Please have a look at [2] where the process is described
(the section Contributor License Agreements).
Many thanks!
Oliver
[1] http://commons.apache.org/configuration/team-list.html
[2] http://www.apache.org/licenses/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org