You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@airflow.apache.org by "amoghrajesh (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2026/06/22 05:41:39 UTC

[PR] Fix potentially misleading comment on task state store model [airflow]

amoghrajesh opened a new pull request, #68824:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/68824

    <!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
         https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -->
   
   <!--
   Thank you for contributing!
   
   Please provide above a brief description of the changes made in this pull request.
   Write a good git commit message following this guide: http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
   
   Please make sure that your code changes are covered with tests.
   And in case of new features or big changes remember to adjust the documentation.
   
   For user-facing UI changes, please attach before/after screenshots (or a short
   screen recording) so reviewers can assess the visual impact.
   
   Feel free to ping (in general) for the review if you do not see reaction for a few days
   (72 Hours is the minimum reaction time you can expect from volunteers) - we sometimes miss notifications.
   
   In case of an existing issue, reference it using one of the following:
   
   * closes: #ISSUE
   * related: #ISSUE
   -->
   
   ---
   
   ##### Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
   
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this PR, please
   change below checkbox to `[X]` followed by the name of the tool, uncomment the "Generated-by".
   -->
   
   - [ ] Yes (please specify the tool below)
   
   <!--
   Generated-by: [Tool Name] following [the guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#gen-ai-assisted-contributions)
   -->
   
   The `expires_at` field in `TaskStateStoreModel` had a comment describing a "global updated_at + default_retention_days check" in `cleanup()` that was never implemented or was leftover from earlier. This led to a false bug report claiming cleanup ignores default_retention_days 🤷🏽: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/68794 but in reality the SDK computes `expires_at` at write time, so the existing `WHERE expires_at < now` pass handles retention correctly. The comment is updated to reflect actual behavior.
   
   ---
   
   * Read the **[Pull Request Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#pull-request-guidelines)** for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
   * For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal ([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvement+Proposals)) is needed.
   * When adding dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   * For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: `{pr_number}.significant.rst`, in [airflow-core/newsfragments](https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow-core/newsfragments). You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Fix potentially misleading comment on task state store model [airflow]

Posted by "amoghrajesh (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
amoghrajesh merged PR #68824:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/68824


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Fix potentially misleading comment on task state store model [airflow]

Posted by "github-actions[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #68824:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/68824#issuecomment-4766589336

   ### Backport successfully created: v3-3-test
   
   Note: As of [Merging PRs targeted for Airflow 3.X](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_AIRFLOW3_DEV.md#merging-prs-targeted-for-airflow-3x)
   the committer who merges the PR is responsible for backporting the PRs that are bug fixes (generally speaking) to the maintenance branches.
   
   In matter of doubt please ask in [#release-management](https://apache-airflow.slack.com/archives/C03G9H97MM2) Slack channel.
   
   <table>
           <tr>
           <th>Status</th>
           <th>Branch</th>
           <th>Result</th>
       </tr>
       <tr>
           <td>✅</td>
           <td>v3-3-test</td>
           <td><a href="https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/68830"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/PR-68830-blue" alt="PR Link"></a></td>
       </tr>
   </table>


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org