You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com> on 2024/08/12 22:57:57 UTC
[VOTE] OTEL Provider to Apache Airflow
Fellow Airflowers,
I would like to start the voting process for OTEL providers for airflow
mentioned in previous discussion in this dev mailing list here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/l0m06llz171m5yhqd016pv58sh5wnqmr
The voting will last at least for 72 hours, until Friday 10:00 am CST time.
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the community
are encouraged to vote with "(non-binding)".
Thank you for your interest in this feature.
Regards,
Howard
Re: [VOTE] OTEL Provider to Apache Airflow
Posted by Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
I'm wondering if all the appropriate information regarding the OTEL
provider for Airflow has been disclosed, and the community has seen
the required information for it to start the voting process.
I would like to restart the voting process for OTEL providers for airflow
mentioned in previous discussion in this dev mailing list here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/l0m06llz171m5yhqd016pv58sh5wnqmr .
More information about the OTEL providers can also be found in this github
issue: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37628
The voting will last at least for 72 hours, until Friday 10:00 am CST time.
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the community
are encouraged to vote with "(non-binding)".
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 3:33 PM Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all, regarding the discussion and vote around Provider for Apache
> Airflow, I have updated the github issue:
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37628 with more information of
> why I am proposing to implement this provider, and in what way the users
> can use it to instrument their DAG's. Originally I was planning to provide
> more information in the PR (https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37989),
> but it looked like I had closed the PR previously and cannot reopen it.
> I would like to reopen another PR for this work should the voting goes
> through and the proposal is approved by the community.
>
> Please let me know if there's any more questions or comments.
> Howard
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 10:17 PM Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ah, got it.
>> I'll put some more details. Thanks!
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 6:46 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah. I think - as discussed in the discussion, some visualisation and
>>> example what the provider will allow would be useful, because it's hard
>>> to
>>> understand it as OTEL is very new concept for us.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 5:49 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Howard,
>>> >
>>> > It's not clear to me what we are actually voting on here. Could you
>>> > elaborate please?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 12 August 2024 23:57:57 BST, Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >Fellow Airflowers,
>>> > >
>>> > >I would like to start the voting process for OTEL providers for
>>> airflow
>>> > >mentioned in previous discussion in this dev mailing list here:
>>> > >https://lists.apache.org/thread/l0m06llz171m5yhqd016pv58sh5wnqmr
>>> > >
>>> > >The voting will last at least for 72 hours, until Friday 10:00 am CST
>>> > time.
>>> > >
>>> > >Please vote accordingly:
>>> > >
>>> > >[ ] +1 approve
>>> > >[ ] +0 no opinion
>>> > >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>> > >
>>> > >Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the
>>> community
>>> > >are encouraged to vote with "(non-binding)".
>>> > >
>>> > >Thank you for your interest in this feature.
>>> > >
>>> > >Regards,
>>> > >Howard
>>> >
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] OTEL Provider to Apache Airflow
Posted by Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com>.
Hi all, regarding the discussion and vote around Provider for Apache
Airflow, I have updated the github issue:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37628 with more information of
why I am proposing to implement this provider, and in what way the users
can use it to instrument their DAG's. Originally I was planning to provide
more information in the PR (https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37989),
but it looked like I had closed the PR previously and cannot reopen it.
I would like to reopen another PR for this work should the voting goes
through and the proposal is approved by the community.
Please let me know if there's any more questions or comments.
Howard
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 10:17 PM Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah, got it.
> I'll put some more details. Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 6:46 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
>> Yeah. I think - as discussed in the discussion, some visualisation and
>> example what the provider will allow would be useful, because it's hard to
>> understand it as OTEL is very new concept for us.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 5:49 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Howard,
>> >
>> > It's not clear to me what we are actually voting on here. Could you
>> > elaborate please?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 12 August 2024 23:57:57 BST, Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >Fellow Airflowers,
>> > >
>> > >I would like to start the voting process for OTEL providers for airflow
>> > >mentioned in previous discussion in this dev mailing list here:
>> > >https://lists.apache.org/thread/l0m06llz171m5yhqd016pv58sh5wnqmr
>> > >
>> > >The voting will last at least for 72 hours, until Friday 10:00 am CST
>> > time.
>> > >
>> > >Please vote accordingly:
>> > >
>> > >[ ] +1 approve
>> > >[ ] +0 no opinion
>> > >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>> > >
>> > >Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the
>> community
>> > >are encouraged to vote with "(non-binding)".
>> > >
>> > >Thank you for your interest in this feature.
>> > >
>> > >Regards,
>> > >Howard
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] OTEL Provider to Apache Airflow
Posted by Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com>.
Ah, got it.
I'll put some more details. Thanks!
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 6:46 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> Yeah. I think - as discussed in the discussion, some visualisation and
> example what the provider will allow would be useful, because it's hard to
> understand it as OTEL is very new concept for us.
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 5:49 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Howard,
> >
> > It's not clear to me what we are actually voting on here. Could you
> > elaborate please?
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12 August 2024 23:57:57 BST, Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >Fellow Airflowers,
> > >
> > >I would like to start the voting process for OTEL providers for airflow
> > >mentioned in previous discussion in this dev mailing list here:
> > >https://lists.apache.org/thread/l0m06llz171m5yhqd016pv58sh5wnqmr
> > >
> > >The voting will last at least for 72 hours, until Friday 10:00 am CST
> > time.
> > >
> > >Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > >[ ] +1 approve
> > >[ ] +0 no opinion
> > >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > >Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the
> community
> > >are encouraged to vote with "(non-binding)".
> > >
> > >Thank you for your interest in this feature.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Howard
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] OTEL Provider to Apache Airflow
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
Yeah. I think - as discussed in the discussion, some visualisation and
example what the provider will allow would be useful, because it's hard to
understand it as OTEL is very new concept for us.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 5:49 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Howard,
>
> It's not clear to me what we are actually voting on here. Could you
> elaborate please?
>
>
>
> On 12 August 2024 23:57:57 BST, Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Fellow Airflowers,
> >
> >I would like to start the voting process for OTEL providers for airflow
> >mentioned in previous discussion in this dev mailing list here:
> >https://lists.apache.org/thread/l0m06llz171m5yhqd016pv58sh5wnqmr
> >
> >The voting will last at least for 72 hours, until Friday 10:00 am CST
> time.
> >
> >Please vote accordingly:
> >
> >[ ] +1 approve
> >[ ] +0 no opinion
> >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> >Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the community
> >are encouraged to vote with "(non-binding)".
> >
> >Thank you for your interest in this feature.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Howard
>
Re: [VOTE] OTEL Provider to Apache Airflow
Posted by Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org>.
Hi Howard,
It's not clear to me what we are actually voting on here. Could you elaborate please?
On 12 August 2024 23:57:57 BST, Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Fellow Airflowers,
>
>I would like to start the voting process for OTEL providers for airflow
>mentioned in previous discussion in this dev mailing list here:
>https://lists.apache.org/thread/l0m06llz171m5yhqd016pv58sh5wnqmr
>
>The voting will last at least for 72 hours, until Friday 10:00 am CST time.
>
>Please vote accordingly:
>
>[ ] +1 approve
>[ ] +0 no opinion
>[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the community
>are encouraged to vote with "(non-binding)".
>
>Thank you for your interest in this feature.
>
>Regards,
>Howard