Re: cvs commit: avalon-sandbox/avalon-net/csframework/bin Apache.Avalon.Framework.Test.dll Apache.Avalon.Framework.dll

[Berin Loritsch <bl...@apache.org>]

hammett@apache.org wrote:

>   
>   
>   1.3       +8 -10     avalon-sandbox/avalon-net/csframework/bin/Apache.Avalon.Framework.Test.dll
>   
>   	<<Binary file>>
>   
>   
>   1.3       +6 -6      avalon-sandbox/avalon-net/csframework/bin/Apache.Avalon.Framework.dll
>   
>   	<<Binary file>>
>   


Two things:

1) We should not DLLs we develop in CVS.  That is what the build script is for.
2) Make sure we commit them with the -kb attribute set.  If it isn't then we
    need to issue the following command:

    cvs -z3 admin -kb Apache.Avalon.Framework.dll

How are things going, is there anything you need help with?

-- 

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
  deserve neither liberty nor safety."
                 - Benjamin Franklin


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org

RES: cvs commit: avalon-sandbox/avalon-net/csframework/bin Apache.Avalon.Framework.Test.dll Apache.Avalon.Framework.dll

[hammett <ho...@bvtibusiness.com.br>]

-----Mensagem original-----
De: Berin Loritsch [mailto:bloritsch@apache.org] 
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 29 de setembro de 2003 09:56

> 1) We should not DLLs we develop in CVS.  That is what the build
script is for.

I agree, but how's the strong named DLL could be made? If we don't
upload the signed assembly we shall upload the private/public key pair.

> 2) Make sure we commit them with the -kb attribute set.  If it isn't
then we
>     need to issue the following command:
>
>   cvs -z3 admin -kb Apache.Avalon.Framework.dll

I'll study it...

> How are things going, is there anything you need help with?

I'm using Avalon.Net here and find out a lot of bugs and things just
strange, for instance:

- There is a BlindLookupManager which only returns dependencies for a
component. Unfortunatelly I find myself in a situation where I need
instances that are not exactly dependencies. So I changed the behavior
to be something like Fortress LookupManager.

My next task is to publish a architetural view of the implementation and
ask for opnions from this list. Unfortunatelly I had to revise my book
during this weekend and didn't have spare time..


Regards,

hammett


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org