You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Al...@sony.com on 2021/05/20 07:27:15 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 [RC1]
Hello all,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version 10.1.0.
The Apache NuttX community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version 10.1.0.
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
NuttX is a real-time operating system (RTOS) with an emphasis on
standards compliance and small footprint. Scalable from 8-bit to 64-bit
microcontroller environments, the primary governing standards in NuttX
are Posix and ANSI standards. Additional standard APIs from Unix and
other common RTOS's (such as VxWorks) are adopted for functionality not
available under these standards, or for functionality that is not
appropriate for deeply- embedded environments (such as fork()).
Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity
involved in the build process.
Apache NuttX community vote and result thread:
Result:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r497704eea8d24bfb68a309369319ec1955d69b6cfec66480e7b0638d%40%3Cdev.nuttx.apache.org%3E
Vote:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra60b4173945cfd2a33924cc8d707863039c1764a7ea8e47a1d8502a0%40%3Cdev.nuttx.apache.org%3E
SCM Information:
Release tag: nuttx-10.1.0-RC1
Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag:
3130ff691e386934eb276587a24d1efacf3bb30b
Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag:
4348d91d1356335483089c3865282d80f13bedcd
[1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/10.1.0-RC1/
[2] https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-10.1.0-RC1/ReleaseNotes
[3] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#approving-a-release
[4] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Alin Jerpelea
Apache NuttX
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 [RC1]
Posted by Nathan Hartman <ha...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
I would like to thank the Incubator community for adding me to the
IPMC and am proud to cast my first (binding) vote in the IPMC for the
latest NuttX release:
+1 (binding) to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0
I checked:
* Signatures
* SHA-512 sums
* Incubating in artifact names
* LICENSE, NOTICE, README.md, DISCLAIMER-WIP present in both tarballs
* Build and run b-g474e-dpow1:nsh configuration successfully
* ReleaseNotes
Notes and observations:
* In "apps" repository, apps/wireless/wapi contains a separate LICENSE
file. This is fixed in PR-704 [1] and the fix will be in the next
release.
Thanks to everyone for making this release possible!
Cheers,
Nathan
[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/704
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:27 AM <Al...@sony.com> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version 10.1.0.
>
> The Apache NuttX community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version 10.1.0.
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> incubator release.
> NuttX is a real-time operating system (RTOS) with an emphasis on
> standards compliance and small footprint. Scalable from 8-bit to 64-bit
> microcontroller environments, the primary governing standards in NuttX
> are Posix and ANSI standards. Additional standard APIs from Unix and
> other common RTOS's (such as VxWorks) are adopted for functionality not
> available under these standards, or for functionality that is not
> appropriate for deeply- embedded environments (such as fork()).
> Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity
> involved in the build process.
>
> Apache NuttX community vote and result thread:
> Result:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r497704eea8d24bfb68a309369319ec1955d69b6cfec66480e7b0638d%40%3Cdev.nuttx.apache.org%3E
>
> Vote:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra60b4173945cfd2a33924cc8d707863039c1764a7ea8e47a1d8502a0%40%3Cdev.nuttx.apache.org%3E
>
> SCM Information:
> Release tag: nuttx-10.1.0-RC1
> Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag:
> 3130ff691e386934eb276587a24d1efacf3bb30b
> Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag:
> 4348d91d1356335483089c3865282d80f13bedcd
>
> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/10.1.0-RC1/
> [2] https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-10.1.0-RC1/ReleaseNotes
> [3] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#approving-a-release
> [4] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Alin Jerpelea
>
> Apache NuttX
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 [RC1]
Posted by "张铎 (Duo Zhang)" <pa...@gmail.com>.
Bring my +1 from the previous thread.
+1(binding)
Checked sigs and sums: Matched
Checked NOTICE and DISCLAIMER-WIP: In place
Built from src: Succeeded with the docker image
docker.pkg.github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/apache-nuttx-ci-linux:latest
and target sim:nsh on x64
Ran basic cmds: cd, hello, echo all worked fine, poweroff could shutdown
the board successfully
Rat-check: Showed huge improvements. For the NuttX main repo, now we have
10383 files under Apache License while 3423 files under other license(most
of them are under BSD I believe, which is compatible with Apache License).
Thanks for your great work on cleaning the license issues.
<Al...@sony.com> 于2021年5月20日周四 下午3:27写道：
> Hello all,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version
> 10.1.0.
>
> The Apache NuttX community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version 10.1.0.
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> incubator release.
> NuttX is a real-time operating system (RTOS) with an emphasis on
> standards compliance and small footprint. Scalable from 8-bit to 64-bit
> microcontroller environments, the primary governing standards in NuttX
> are Posix and ANSI standards. Additional standard APIs from Unix and
> other common RTOS's (such as VxWorks) are adopted for functionality not
> available under these standards, or for functionality that is not
> appropriate for deeply- embedded environments (such as fork()).
> Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity
> involved in the build process.
>
> Apache NuttX community vote and result thread:
> Result:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r497704eea8d24bfb68a309369319ec1955d69b6cfec66480e7b0638d%40%3Cdev.nuttx.apache.org%3E
>
> Vote:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra60b4173945cfd2a33924cc8d707863039c1764a7ea8e47a1d8502a0%40%3Cdev.nuttx.apache.org%3E
>
> SCM Information:
> Release tag: nuttx-10.1.0-RC1
> Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag:
> 3130ff691e386934eb276587a24d1efacf3bb30b
> Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag:
> 4348d91d1356335483089c3865282d80f13bedcd
>
> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/10.1.0-RC1/
> [2]
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-10.1.0-RC1/ReleaseNotes
> [3] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#approving-a-release
> [4]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Alin Jerpelea
>
> Apache NuttX
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 [RC1]
Posted by Abdelatif Guettouche <ab...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Duo Zhang and John for your votes. We still need one more
before we can release.
> If it's the second case, then I agree we should fix it.
I think it's rather the first option. As you described, we distribute
two different repositories and when extracted the LICENSE files are
found inside their respective folders.
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 12:36 AM Nathan Hartman
<ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 9:42 PM John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > +1 binding from me, with a couple of notes:
> >
> > - it could be how I'm extracting your source tars, but the packages are
> > ending up in a directory child to it. We typically look for the
> > LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER in the root folder.
>
>
> Do you mean that you get:
>
> nuttx/LICENSE
>
> or
>
> <some_other_dir>/nuttx/LICENSE
>
> If it's the first case, I think that's usually desirable because otherwise
> the users may untar expecting to get one folder with all the contents in
> it, but end up getting a bunch of directories and files instead. When that
> happens in a directory containing many other files, it creates a big mess.
> Also as NuttX needs nuttx/ and apps/ to be sibling directories, it might be
> confusing if there's no enclosing directory. (The apps/ distribution
> provided by our project is optional and the user may substitute their own.)
>
> If it's the second case, then I agree we should fix it.
>
> What incantation are you using to extract the contents?
>
> More below:
>
> - I'm ok with the LICENSE but would like you all to fix this section at
> > some point:
> >
> >
> > uIP
> >
> > ===
> >
> >
> > Many lower-level networking components of NuttX derive from uIP which
> >
> > has a similar BSD style license:
> >
> >
> > Copyright (c) 2001-2003, Adam Dunkels.
> >
> > All rights reserved.
> >
> >
> > Rhombus Math Library
> >
> > ====================
> >
> >
> > The math library used in NuttX derives from the Rhombus OS by Nick Johnson
> >
> > (with many, many addtions). The Rhombus OS is/was distributed under the
> > ISC
> >
> > license. The ISC licsense is a permissive license that allows people do
> >
> > anything with your code with proper attribution and without warranty. The
> >
> > ISC license is functionally equivalent to the BSD 2-Clause and MIT
> > licenses,
> >
> > removing some language that is no longer necessary.
> >
> >
> > IGMP
> >
> > ====
> >
> >
> > IGMP support, if enabled, adds additional logic by Steve Reynolds:
> >
> >
> > Copyright (c) 2002 CITEL Technologies Ltd.
> >
> > All rights reserved.
> >
> >
> > This should ideally list out the actual license contents instead of an
> > explanation of what the license is.
>
>
> Good catch! We'll fix it.
>
> Thank you for your feedback,
> Nathan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
NuttX Archive Structure (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX
(Incubating) 10.1.0 [RC1])
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Apologies for not responding earlier.
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 7:36 PM Nathan Hartman <ha...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 9:42 PM John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > +1 binding from me, with a couple of notes:
> >
> > - it could be how I'm extracting your source tars, but the packages are
> > ending up in a directory child to it. We typically look for the
> > LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER in the root folder.
>
>
> Do you mean that you get:
>
> nuttx/LICENSE
>
> or
>
> <some_other_dir>/nuttx/LICENSE
>
> If it's the first case, I think that's usually desirable because otherwise
> the users may untar expecting to get one folder with all the contents in
> it, but end up getting a bunch of directories and files instead. When that
> happens in a directory containing many other files, it creates a big mess.
> Also as NuttX needs nuttx/ and apps/ to be sibling directories, it might be
> confusing if there's no enclosing directory. (The apps/ distribution
> provided by our project is optional and the user may substitute their own.)
>
> If it's the second case, then I agree we should fix it.
>
> What incantation are you using to extract the contents?
>
It's basically the second part of what you're describing. Understand also
that you're providing *source* releases, not *binary* releases. There may
be additional compile/build steps required to make the code work,
regardless of language/tools used.
>
> More below:
>
> - I'm ok with the LICENSE but would like you all to fix this section at
> > some point:
> >
> >
> > uIP
> >
> > ===
> >
> >
> > Many lower-level networking components of NuttX derive from uIP which
> >
> > has a similar BSD style license:
> >
> >
> > Copyright (c) 2001-2003, Adam Dunkels.
> >
> > All rights reserved.
> >
> >
> > Rhombus Math Library
> >
> > ====================
> >
> >
> > The math library used in NuttX derives from the Rhombus OS by Nick
> Johnson
> >
> > (with many, many addtions). The Rhombus OS is/was distributed under the
> > ISC
> >
> > license. The ISC licsense is a permissive license that allows people do
> >
> > anything with your code with proper attribution and without warranty.
> The
> >
> > ISC license is functionally equivalent to the BSD 2-Clause and MIT
> > licenses,
> >
> > removing some language that is no longer necessary.
> >
> >
> > IGMP
> >
> > ====
> >
> >
> > IGMP support, if enabled, adds additional logic by Steve Reynolds:
> >
> >
> > Copyright (c) 2002 CITEL Technologies Ltd.
> >
> > All rights reserved.
> >
> >
> > This should ideally list out the actual license contents instead of an
> > explanation of what the license is.
>
>
> Good catch! We'll fix it.
>
> Thank you for your feedback,
> Nathan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 [RC1]
Posted by Nathan Hartman <ha...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 9:42 PM John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> +1 binding from me, with a couple of notes:
>
> - it could be how I'm extracting your source tars, but the packages are
> ending up in a directory child to it. We typically look for the
> LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER in the root folder.
Do you mean that you get:
nuttx/LICENSE
or
<some_other_dir>/nuttx/LICENSE
If it's the first case, I think that's usually desirable because otherwise
the users may untar expecting to get one folder with all the contents in
it, but end up getting a bunch of directories and files instead. When that
happens in a directory containing many other files, it creates a big mess.
Also as NuttX needs nuttx/ and apps/ to be sibling directories, it might be
confusing if there's no enclosing directory. (The apps/ distribution
provided by our project is optional and the user may substitute their own.)
If it's the second case, then I agree we should fix it.
What incantation are you using to extract the contents?
More below:
- I'm ok with the LICENSE but would like you all to fix this section at
> some point:
>
>
> uIP
>
> ===
>
>
> Many lower-level networking components of NuttX derive from uIP which
>
> has a similar BSD style license:
>
>
> Copyright (c) 2001-2003, Adam Dunkels.
>
> All rights reserved.
>
>
> Rhombus Math Library
>
> ====================
>
>
> The math library used in NuttX derives from the Rhombus OS by Nick Johnson
>
> (with many, many addtions). The Rhombus OS is/was distributed under the
> ISC
>
> license. The ISC licsense is a permissive license that allows people do
>
> anything with your code with proper attribution and without warranty. The
>
> ISC license is functionally equivalent to the BSD 2-Clause and MIT
> licenses,
>
> removing some language that is no longer necessary.
>
>
> IGMP
>
> ====
>
>
> IGMP support, if enabled, adds additional logic by Steve Reynolds:
>
>
> Copyright (c) 2002 CITEL Technologies Ltd.
>
> All rights reserved.
>
>
> This should ideally list out the actual license contents instead of an
> explanation of what the license is.
Good catch! We'll fix it.
Thank you for your feedback,
Nathan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 [RC1]
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Hi
+1 binding from me, with a couple of notes:
- it could be how I'm extracting your source tars, but the packages are
ending up in a directory child to it. We typically look for the
LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER in the root folder.
- I'm ok with the LICENSE but would like you all to fix this section at
some point:
uIP
===
Many lower-level networking components of NuttX derive from uIP which
has a similar BSD style license:
Copyright (c) 2001-2003, Adam Dunkels.
All rights reserved.
Rhombus Math Library
====================
The math library used in NuttX derives from the Rhombus OS by Nick Johnson
(with many, many addtions). The Rhombus OS is/was distributed under the ISC
license. The ISC licsense is a permissive license that allows people do
anything with your code with proper attribution and without warranty. The
ISC license is functionally equivalent to the BSD 2-Clause and MIT licenses,
removing some language that is no longer necessary.
IGMP
====
IGMP support, if enabled, adds additional logic by Steve Reynolds:
Copyright (c) 2002 CITEL Technologies Ltd.
All rights reserved.
This should ideally list out the actual license contents instead of an
explanation of what the license is.
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:27 AM <Al...@sony.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version
> 10.1.0.
>
> The Apache NuttX community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version 10.1.0.
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> incubator release.
> NuttX is a real-time operating system (RTOS) with an emphasis on
> standards compliance and small footprint. Scalable from 8-bit to 64-bit
> microcontroller environments, the primary governing standards in NuttX
> are Posix and ANSI standards. Additional standard APIs from Unix and
> other common RTOS's (such as VxWorks) are adopted for functionality not
> available under these standards, or for functionality that is not
> appropriate for deeply- embedded environments (such as fork()).
> Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity
> involved in the build process.
>
> Apache NuttX community vote and result thread:
> Result:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r497704eea8d24bfb68a309369319ec1955d69b6cfec66480e7b0638d%40%3Cdev.nuttx.apache.org%3E
>
> Vote:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra60b4173945cfd2a33924cc8d707863039c1764a7ea8e47a1d8502a0%40%3Cdev.nuttx.apache.org%3E
>
> SCM Information:
> Release tag: nuttx-10.1.0-RC1
> Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag:
> 3130ff691e386934eb276587a24d1efacf3bb30b
> Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag:
> 4348d91d1356335483089c3865282d80f13bedcd
>
> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/10.1.0-RC1/
> [2]
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-10.1.0-RC1/ReleaseNotes
> [3] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#approving-a-release
> [4]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Alin Jerpelea
>
> Apache NuttX
>