You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com> on 2014/06/24 11:57:44 UTC
big revert
H,
I just reverted six commits. I did most of those commits myself. There
was a misunderstanding on my part on the validity of the commits and
the place these should go. If you have any questions about it, feel
free to ask.
the short version: they should have gone in the feature branch 'ovmsupport'.
regards,
--
Daan
Re: big revert
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
I got stomped ;} from three sides.
no seriously. Sebastien wondered about it as he actually made the
branch and was surprised that it was committed on master,
Mike and Hugo started asking questions about sql code that I didn't catch.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Donal Lafferty
<do...@citrix.com> wrote:
> How did you catch the problem?
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 24 June 2014 10:58
>> To: dev
>> Subject: big revert
>>
>> H,
>>
>> I just reverted six commits. I did most of those commits myself. There was a
>> misunderstanding on my part on the validity of the commits and the place
>> these should go. If you have any questions about it, feel free to ask.
>>
>> the short version: they should have gone in the feature branch 'ovmsupport'.
>>
>> regards,
>> --
>> Daan
--
Daan
RE: big revert
Posted by Donal Lafferty <do...@citrix.com>.
How did you catch the problem?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> Sent: 24 June 2014 10:58
> To: dev
> Subject: big revert
>
> H,
>
> I just reverted six commits. I did most of those commits myself. There was a
> misunderstanding on my part on the validity of the commits and the place
> these should go. If you have any questions about it, feel free to ask.
>
> the short version: they should have gone in the feature branch 'ovmsupport'.
>
> regards,
> --
> Daan