You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by ski n <ra...@gmail.com> on 2023/12/04 22:16:05 UTC
Xbean with ActiveMQ Classic 6
I'm currently upgrading to the new ActiveMQ 6 (from 5.18.3 to 6.0.1).
I'm starting an embedded with the help of xbean:
https://activemq.apache.org/broker-xbean-uri
Using the " xbean:file:filePathResource ".
My code is like this:
//get the path of activemq.xml file
String brokerPath = brokerFile.getCanonicalPath();
//create the xbean broker uri
String brokerUrl = "xbean:file:" +
UrlEscapers.urlFragmentEscaper().escape(brokerPath);
//create the broker with the xbean uri
URI configurationUri = new URI(brokerUrl);
broker = BrokerFactory.createBroker(configurationUri);
I however get a classnotfoundexception:
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.activemq.xbean.XBeanBrokerFactory
at
java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:641)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:188)
at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:526)
at
org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.loadClass(FactoryFinder.java:88)
at
org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.create(FactoryFinder.java:61)
at
org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder.newInstance(FactoryFinder.java:154)
at
org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerFactory.createBrokerFactoryHandler(BrokerFactory.java:41)
I didn't change the dependencies and just updated the version. Only after
adding this dependency:
<!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.activemq/activemq-spring
-->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-spring</artifactId>
<version>6.0.1</version>
</dependency>
The ActiveMQ 6 Classic broker worked. Is this expected? Has there been a
change on the xbean? Is there an upgrade guide where to look out for?
Raymond
Re: Xbean with ActiveMQ Classic 6
Posted by Matt Pavlovich <ma...@gmail.com>.
Glad to hear =)
> On Dec 5, 2023, at 9:58 AM, ski n <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Short update on the upgrade to AMQ 6. After checking the dependency tree
> with Gradle I found out that ActiveMQ was downgraded to 5.18.3. I changed
> that and now it works fine.Thnx
>
> Raymond
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 10:04 AM ski n <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And does there is also a new version of the activemq.xsd schema?
>>
>> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/
>>
>> Can't find a 6.0 compatible one. The old one has also for example:
>>
>> <bean id="pooledConnectionFactory"
>> class="javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory.PooledConnectionFactoryFactoryBean">
>>
>> The trouble is some libs were changed from javax to jakarta, but some
>> stayed the same as they are not related to the Jakarta project as managed
>> by the Eclipse foundation.
>>
>> Raymond
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:50 AM ski n <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think you are right. I for example, thought I updated all dependencies
>>> to Jakarta, but still got:
>>>
>>> jakarta.servlet.ServletException: Handler dispatch failed:
>>> java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Class
>>> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory does not implement the
>>> requested interface jakarta.jms.ConnectionFactory
>>>
>>> Need to run a dependency tree. Does ActiveMQ 6 completely use jakarta or
>>> does it still uses javax for some stuff?
>>>
>>> Raymond
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:13 AM Matt Pavlovich <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Raymond-
>>>>
>>>> There are a ton of unit tests that use the xbean factory.
>>>>
>>>> I suspect a classpath issue.
>>>>
>>>> If you can share a simplified code project via GitHub, I’d be happy to
>>>> look at it this week.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Matt Pavlovich
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 4, 2023, at 4:16 PM, ski n <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm currently upgrading to the new ActiveMQ 6 (from 5.18.3 to 6.0.1).
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm starting an embedded with the help of xbean:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://activemq.apache.org/broker-xbean-uri
>>>>>
>>>>> Using the " xbean:file:filePathResource ".
>>>>>
>>>>> My code is like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> //get the path of activemq.xml file
>>>>> String brokerPath = brokerFile.getCanonicalPath();
>>>>>
>>>>> //create the xbean broker uri
>>>>> String brokerUrl = "xbean:file:" +
>>>>> UrlEscapers.urlFragmentEscaper().escape(brokerPath);
>>>>>
>>>>> //create the broker with the xbean uri
>>>>> URI configurationUri = new URI(brokerUrl);
>>>>> broker = BrokerFactory.createBroker(configurationUri);
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I however get a classnotfoundexception:
>>>>>
>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>>> org.apache.activemq.xbean.XBeanBrokerFactory
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:641)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:188)
>>>>> at
>>>> java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:526)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.loadClass(FactoryFinder.java:88)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.create(FactoryFinder.java:61)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder.newInstance(FactoryFinder.java:154)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerFactory.createBrokerFactoryHandler(BrokerFactory.java:41)
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't change the dependencies and just updated the version. Only
>>>> after
>>>>> adding this dependency:
>>>>>
>>>>> <!--
>>>> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.activemq/activemq-spring
>>>>> -->
>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
>>>>> <artifactId>activemq-spring</artifactId>
>>>>> <version>6.0.1</version>
>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>
>>>>> The ActiveMQ 6 Classic broker worked. Is this expected? Has there been
>>>> a
>>>>> change on the xbean? Is there an upgrade guide where to look out for?
>>>>>
>>>>> Raymond
>>>>
>>>>
Re: Xbean with ActiveMQ Classic 6
Posted by ski n <ra...@gmail.com>.
Short update on the upgrade to AMQ 6. After checking the dependency tree
with Gradle I found out that ActiveMQ was downgraded to 5.18.3. I changed
that and now it works fine.Thnx
Raymond
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 10:04 AM ski n <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And does there is also a new version of the activemq.xsd schema?
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/
>
> Can't find a 6.0 compatible one. The old one has also for example:
>
> <bean id="pooledConnectionFactory"
> class="javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory.PooledConnectionFactoryFactoryBean">
>
> The trouble is some libs were changed from javax to jakarta, but some
> stayed the same as they are not related to the Jakarta project as managed
> by the Eclipse foundation.
>
> Raymond
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:50 AM ski n <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think you are right. I for example, thought I updated all dependencies
>> to Jakarta, but still got:
>>
>> jakarta.servlet.ServletException: Handler dispatch failed:
>> java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Class
>> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory does not implement the
>> requested interface jakarta.jms.ConnectionFactory
>>
>> Need to run a dependency tree. Does ActiveMQ 6 completely use jakarta or
>> does it still uses javax for some stuff?
>>
>> Raymond
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:13 AM Matt Pavlovich <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Raymond-
>>>
>>> There are a ton of unit tests that use the xbean factory.
>>>
>>> I suspect a classpath issue.
>>>
>>> If you can share a simplified code project via GitHub, I’d be happy to
>>> look at it this week.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matt Pavlovich
>>>
>>> > On Dec 4, 2023, at 4:16 PM, ski n <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I'm currently upgrading to the new ActiveMQ 6 (from 5.18.3 to 6.0.1).
>>> >
>>> > I'm starting an embedded with the help of xbean:
>>> >
>>> > https://activemq.apache.org/broker-xbean-uri
>>> >
>>> > Using the " xbean:file:filePathResource ".
>>> >
>>> > My code is like this:
>>> >
>>> > //get the path of activemq.xml file
>>> > String brokerPath = brokerFile.getCanonicalPath();
>>> >
>>> > //create the xbean broker uri
>>> > String brokerUrl = "xbean:file:" +
>>> > UrlEscapers.urlFragmentEscaper().escape(brokerPath);
>>> >
>>> > //create the broker with the xbean uri
>>> > URI configurationUri = new URI(brokerUrl);
>>> > broker = BrokerFactory.createBroker(configurationUri);
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I however get a classnotfoundexception:
>>> >
>>> > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>> > org.apache.activemq.xbean.XBeanBrokerFactory
>>> > at
>>> >
>>> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:641)
>>> > at
>>> >
>>> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:188)
>>> > at
>>> java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:526)
>>> > at
>>> >
>>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.loadClass(FactoryFinder.java:88)
>>> > at
>>> >
>>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.create(FactoryFinder.java:61)
>>> > at
>>> >
>>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder.newInstance(FactoryFinder.java:154)
>>> > at
>>> >
>>> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerFactory.createBrokerFactoryHandler(BrokerFactory.java:41)
>>> >
>>> > I didn't change the dependencies and just updated the version. Only
>>> after
>>> > adding this dependency:
>>> >
>>> > <!--
>>> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.activemq/activemq-spring
>>> > -->
>>> > <dependency>
>>> > <groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
>>> > <artifactId>activemq-spring</artifactId>
>>> > <version>6.0.1</version>
>>> > </dependency>
>>> >
>>> > The ActiveMQ 6 Classic broker worked. Is this expected? Has there been
>>> a
>>> > change on the xbean? Is there an upgrade guide where to look out for?
>>> >
>>> > Raymond
>>>
>>>
Re: Xbean with ActiveMQ Classic 6
Posted by Matt Pavlovich <ma...@gmail.com>.
> On Dec 5, 2023, at 3:04 AM, ski n <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/
I’ve contacted the committer who did the release, and he will finish pushing the XSDs out. You should see new schemas up shortly.
> <bean id="pooledConnectionFactory"
> class="javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory.PooledConnectionFactoryFactoryBean">
This is a really out-dated javadoc reference. I’ll look into how we can update it going forward. Essentially, it is an out-dated in-line example of creating a pooledConnectionFactory.
Please use the more current examples from activemq-pool/activemq-jms-pool
Thanks!
Matt Pavlovich
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:50 AM ski n <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think you are right. I for example, thought I updated all dependencies
>> to Jakarta, but still got:
>>
>> jakarta.servlet.ServletException: Handler dispatch failed:
>> java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Class
>> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory does not implement the
>> requested interface jakarta.jms.ConnectionFactory
>>
>> Need to run a dependency tree. Does ActiveMQ 6 completely use jakarta or
>> does it still uses javax for some stuff?
>>
>> Raymond
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:13 AM Matt Pavlovich <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Raymond-
>>>
>>> There are a ton of unit tests that use the xbean factory.
>>>
>>> I suspect a classpath issue.
>>>
>>> If you can share a simplified code project via GitHub, I’d be happy to
>>> look at it this week.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matt Pavlovich
>>>
>>>> On Dec 4, 2023, at 4:16 PM, ski n <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm currently upgrading to the new ActiveMQ 6 (from 5.18.3 to 6.0.1).
>>>>
>>>> I'm starting an embedded with the help of xbean:
>>>>
>>>> https://activemq.apache.org/broker-xbean-uri
>>>>
>>>> Using the " xbean:file:filePathResource ".
>>>>
>>>> My code is like this:
>>>>
>>>> //get the path of activemq.xml file
>>>> String brokerPath = brokerFile.getCanonicalPath();
>>>>
>>>> //create the xbean broker uri
>>>> String brokerUrl = "xbean:file:" +
>>>> UrlEscapers.urlFragmentEscaper().escape(brokerPath);
>>>>
>>>> //create the broker with the xbean uri
>>>> URI configurationUri = new URI(brokerUrl);
>>>> broker = BrokerFactory.createBroker(configurationUri);
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I however get a classnotfoundexception:
>>>>
>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>> org.apache.activemq.xbean.XBeanBrokerFactory
>>>> at
>>>>
>>> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:641)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:188)
>>>> at
>>> java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:526)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.loadClass(FactoryFinder.java:88)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.create(FactoryFinder.java:61)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder.newInstance(FactoryFinder.java:154)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerFactory.createBrokerFactoryHandler(BrokerFactory.java:41)
>>>>
>>>> I didn't change the dependencies and just updated the version. Only
>>> after
>>>> adding this dependency:
>>>>
>>>> <!--
>>> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.activemq/activemq-spring
>>>> -->
>>>> <dependency>
>>>> <groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
>>>> <artifactId>activemq-spring</artifactId>
>>>> <version>6.0.1</version>
>>>> </dependency>
>>>>
>>>> The ActiveMQ 6 Classic broker worked. Is this expected? Has there been a
>>>> change on the xbean? Is there an upgrade guide where to look out for?
>>>>
>>>> Raymond
>>>
>>>
Re: Xbean with ActiveMQ Classic 6
Posted by ski n <ra...@gmail.com>.
And does there is also a new version of the activemq.xsd schema?
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/
Can't find a 6.0 compatible one. The old one has also for example:
<bean id="pooledConnectionFactory"
class="javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory.PooledConnectionFactoryFactoryBean">
The trouble is some libs were changed from javax to jakarta, but some
stayed the same as they are not related to the Jakarta project as managed
by the Eclipse foundation.
Raymond
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:50 AM ski n <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think you are right. I for example, thought I updated all dependencies
> to Jakarta, but still got:
>
> jakarta.servlet.ServletException: Handler dispatch failed:
> java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Class
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory does not implement the
> requested interface jakarta.jms.ConnectionFactory
>
> Need to run a dependency tree. Does ActiveMQ 6 completely use jakarta or
> does it still uses javax for some stuff?
>
> Raymond
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:13 AM Matt Pavlovich <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Raymond-
>>
>> There are a ton of unit tests that use the xbean factory.
>>
>> I suspect a classpath issue.
>>
>> If you can share a simplified code project via GitHub, I’d be happy to
>> look at it this week.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matt Pavlovich
>>
>> > On Dec 4, 2023, at 4:16 PM, ski n <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm currently upgrading to the new ActiveMQ 6 (from 5.18.3 to 6.0.1).
>> >
>> > I'm starting an embedded with the help of xbean:
>> >
>> > https://activemq.apache.org/broker-xbean-uri
>> >
>> > Using the " xbean:file:filePathResource ".
>> >
>> > My code is like this:
>> >
>> > //get the path of activemq.xml file
>> > String brokerPath = brokerFile.getCanonicalPath();
>> >
>> > //create the xbean broker uri
>> > String brokerUrl = "xbean:file:" +
>> > UrlEscapers.urlFragmentEscaper().escape(brokerPath);
>> >
>> > //create the broker with the xbean uri
>> > URI configurationUri = new URI(brokerUrl);
>> > broker = BrokerFactory.createBroker(configurationUri);
>> >
>> >
>> > I however get a classnotfoundexception:
>> >
>> > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>> > org.apache.activemq.xbean.XBeanBrokerFactory
>> > at
>> >
>> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:641)
>> > at
>> >
>> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:188)
>> > at
>> java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:526)
>> > at
>> >
>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.loadClass(FactoryFinder.java:88)
>> > at
>> >
>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.create(FactoryFinder.java:61)
>> > at
>> >
>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder.newInstance(FactoryFinder.java:154)
>> > at
>> >
>> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerFactory.createBrokerFactoryHandler(BrokerFactory.java:41)
>> >
>> > I didn't change the dependencies and just updated the version. Only
>> after
>> > adding this dependency:
>> >
>> > <!--
>> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.activemq/activemq-spring
>> > -->
>> > <dependency>
>> > <groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
>> > <artifactId>activemq-spring</artifactId>
>> > <version>6.0.1</version>
>> > </dependency>
>> >
>> > The ActiveMQ 6 Classic broker worked. Is this expected? Has there been a
>> > change on the xbean? Is there an upgrade guide where to look out for?
>> >
>> > Raymond
>>
>>
Re: Xbean with ActiveMQ Classic 6
Posted by ski n <ra...@gmail.com>.
I think you are right. I for example, thought I updated all dependencies to
Jakarta, but still got:
jakarta.servlet.ServletException: Handler dispatch failed:
java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Class
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory does not implement the
requested interface jakarta.jms.ConnectionFactory
Need to run a dependency tree. Does ActiveMQ 6 completely use jakarta or
does it still uses javax for some stuff?
Raymond
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:13 AM Matt Pavlovich <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Raymond-
>
> There are a ton of unit tests that use the xbean factory.
>
> I suspect a classpath issue.
>
> If you can share a simplified code project via GitHub, I’d be happy to
> look at it this week.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt Pavlovich
>
> > On Dec 4, 2023, at 4:16 PM, ski n <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm currently upgrading to the new ActiveMQ 6 (from 5.18.3 to 6.0.1).
> >
> > I'm starting an embedded with the help of xbean:
> >
> > https://activemq.apache.org/broker-xbean-uri
> >
> > Using the " xbean:file:filePathResource ".
> >
> > My code is like this:
> >
> > //get the path of activemq.xml file
> > String brokerPath = brokerFile.getCanonicalPath();
> >
> > //create the xbean broker uri
> > String brokerUrl = "xbean:file:" +
> > UrlEscapers.urlFragmentEscaper().escape(brokerPath);
> >
> > //create the broker with the xbean uri
> > URI configurationUri = new URI(brokerUrl);
> > broker = BrokerFactory.createBroker(configurationUri);
> >
> >
> > I however get a classnotfoundexception:
> >
> > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> > org.apache.activemq.xbean.XBeanBrokerFactory
> > at
> >
> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:641)
> > at
> >
> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:188)
> > at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:526)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.loadClass(FactoryFinder.java:88)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.create(FactoryFinder.java:61)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder.newInstance(FactoryFinder.java:154)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerFactory.createBrokerFactoryHandler(BrokerFactory.java:41)
> >
> > I didn't change the dependencies and just updated the version. Only after
> > adding this dependency:
> >
> > <!--
> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.activemq/activemq-spring
> > -->
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
> > <artifactId>activemq-spring</artifactId>
> > <version>6.0.1</version>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > The ActiveMQ 6 Classic broker worked. Is this expected? Has there been a
> > change on the xbean? Is there an upgrade guide where to look out for?
> >
> > Raymond
>
>
Re: Xbean with ActiveMQ Classic 6
Posted by Matt Pavlovich <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi Raymond-
There are a ton of unit tests that use the xbean factory.
I suspect a classpath issue.
If you can share a simplified code project via GitHub, I’d be happy to look at it this week.
Thanks,
Matt Pavlovich
> On Dec 4, 2023, at 4:16 PM, ski n <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm currently upgrading to the new ActiveMQ 6 (from 5.18.3 to 6.0.1).
>
> I'm starting an embedded with the help of xbean:
>
> https://activemq.apache.org/broker-xbean-uri
>
> Using the " xbean:file:filePathResource ".
>
> My code is like this:
>
> //get the path of activemq.xml file
> String brokerPath = brokerFile.getCanonicalPath();
>
> //create the xbean broker uri
> String brokerUrl = "xbean:file:" +
> UrlEscapers.urlFragmentEscaper().escape(brokerPath);
>
> //create the broker with the xbean uri
> URI configurationUri = new URI(brokerUrl);
> broker = BrokerFactory.createBroker(configurationUri);
>
>
> I however get a classnotfoundexception:
>
> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> org.apache.activemq.xbean.XBeanBrokerFactory
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:641)
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:188)
> at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:526)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.loadClass(FactoryFinder.java:88)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.create(FactoryFinder.java:61)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder.newInstance(FactoryFinder.java:154)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerFactory.createBrokerFactoryHandler(BrokerFactory.java:41)
>
> I didn't change the dependencies and just updated the version. Only after
> adding this dependency:
>
> <!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.activemq/activemq-spring
> -->
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
> <artifactId>activemq-spring</artifactId>
> <version>6.0.1</version>
> </dependency>
>
> The ActiveMQ 6 Classic broker worked. Is this expected? Has there been a
> change on the xbean? Is there an upgrade guide where to look out for?
>
> Raymond