You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@asterixdb.apache.org by "Taewoo Kim (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/11/11 05:28:58 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1733) Hash Table used by hash-join doesn't conform to the budget.

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15656196#comment-15656196 ] 

Taewoo Kim commented on ASTERIXDB-1733:
---------------------------------------

Related to the issue ASTERIXDB-1566, the hash table size is not accounted for the hash join. So, Data Table alone conforms to the budget (join.memory M). So, the chances are high that hash table size (H) + D > M holds true after the build phase. Here is the proposed solution after talking with [~dtabass]. 

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1rb-YJxBQmmtg6cViU5-072NeyNUAXUBM2SIktPeacOU/edit?usp=sharing

> Hash Table used by hash-join doesn't conform to the budget.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ASTERIXDB-1733
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1733
>             Project: Apache AsterixDB
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Taewoo Kim
>            Assignee: Taewoo Kim
>
> The hash table in the hash join doesn't conform to the frame limit (join.memory parameter in the configuration file). This is related to ASTERIXDB-1556.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)