You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de> on 2014/04/23 10:34:30 UTC
Releasing The SDK-Converter (Mavenizer)?
Hi,
I am currently completeley refactoring the Mavenizer to consist of independent modules for converting AIR, Flash and Flex separately. I need this in order to use those modules in the new Flexmojos verify-mojo that should take care of downloading and mavenizing air and flash artifacts. This is needed in order for us to be able to officially publish flex in a public maven repo.
However, in order to use these in Flexmojos I would need them to be publically available (Even if I should be safe to have them in some SNAPSHOT version). How in general would the process of releasing these modules be? (as they are only a part of the utilities sub-project). Are we able to release parts of this independently from the rest of the utilities module? Otherwise I would stick to adding a clone of the code to Flexmojos for now and work with that till we have settled any release problems.
Chris
AW: Releasing The SDK-Converter (Mavenizer)?
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Yes I am talking about the flex-utilities repo.
Well the sdk converter is built by maven and would probably be released using mavens built-in release process.
Here the same steps can be done as with Ant ... all the packaging, signing, deploying etc.
Think it would also be a good test for a maven based apache release.
The thing I was unsure about was that if it is possible to release parts of a repo. Bui I would assume that it is.
Chris
________________________________________
Von: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. April 2014 15:28
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Releasing The SDK-Converter (Mavenizer)?
Are you talking about the flex-utilities repo? You can definitely release
and subset of source code from that repo. All you need is an ant script
that does the packaging and building. The Installer is a subset of that
repo.
-Alex
On 4/23/14 1:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>
>I am currently completeley refactoring the Mavenizer to consist of
>independent modules for converting AIR, Flash and Flex separately. I need
>this in order to use those modules in the new Flexmojos verify-mojo that
>should take care of downloading and mavenizing air and flash artifacts.
>This is needed in order for us to be able to officially publish flex in a
>public maven repo.
>
>
>
>However, in order to use these in Flexmojos I would need them to be
>publically available (Even if I should be safe to have them in some
>SNAPSHOT version). How in general would the process of releasing these
>modules be? (as they are only a part of the utilities sub-project). Are
>we able to release parts of this independently from the rest of the
>utilities module? Otherwise I would stick to adding a clone of the code
>to Flexmojos for now and work with that till we have settled any release
>problems.
>
>
>
>Chris
Re: Releasing The SDK-Converter (Mavenizer)?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Are you talking about the flex-utilities repo? You can definitely release
and subset of source code from that repo. All you need is an ant script
that does the packaging and building. The Installer is a subset of that
repo.
-Alex
On 4/23/14 1:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>
>I am currently completeley refactoring the Mavenizer to consist of
>independent modules for converting AIR, Flash and Flex separately. I need
>this in order to use those modules in the new Flexmojos verify-mojo that
>should take care of downloading and mavenizing air and flash artifacts.
>This is needed in order for us to be able to officially publish flex in a
>public maven repo.
>
>
>
>However, in order to use these in Flexmojos I would need them to be
>publically available (Even if I should be safe to have them in some
>SNAPSHOT version). How in general would the process of releasing these
>modules be? (as they are only a part of the utilities sub-project). Are
>we able to release parts of this independently from the rest of the
>utilities module? Otherwise I would stick to adding a clone of the code
>to Flexmojos for now and work with that till we have settled any release
>problems.
>
>
>
>Chris