[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on pull request #880: JENA-2006: DatasetGraph prefixes

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

afs commented on pull request #880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/880#issuecomment-738218203


   > Does this constitute a breaking change (either at the API level or behavioural)?
   
   No.
   
   `Dataset.getPrefixMapping()` has a default method.
   
   `DatasetGraph` does have a new interface method. We could add a default impl but at the moment, it signals "take note" to any downstream implementations I don't know about.
   
   There is no intention to break or change any behaviour where code has not been unwrapping classes and directly getting at the TDB1/TDB2 prefix storage. But that's cheating anyway :-).
   
   It is a big internal change. One reason for putting in right at the start of a version cycle is to give it maximum shakedown and to give downstream systems as much chance as possible to test. I know of very few cases of prefixes not being used as "parse in to set, write out to use".
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: pr-unsubscribe@jena.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: pr-help@jena.apache.org