You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to github@arrow.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/04/05 14:34:38 UTC

[GitHub] [arrow] westonpace commented on pull request #9892: ARROW-12208: [C++] Add the ability to run async tasks without using the CPU thread pool

westonpace commented on pull request #9892:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9892#issuecomment-813425806


   @pitrou I initially wanted to replace the IOContext's executor with the serial executor as well but I wasn't sure what the best way to do that would be.  For example, I could create a new IOContext with the same pool & stop token but a different executor and pass that down but I wasn't sure if that would be correct.
   
   I think a simplified version of my question is "does the IOContext come from the calling user (via options) or from the filesystem?"


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org