You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apex.apache.org by "Yogi Devendra (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/08/05 05:46:20 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (APEXCORE-501) Sub Partitioning the parallel
partitions
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15408917#comment-15408917 ]
Yogi Devendra commented on APEXCORE-501:
----------------------------------------
Link for the discussion: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/df591140a7f50a7bd9f1d7bc41fe29a93c83a13a645329f5301eebf7@%3Cusers.apex.apache.org%3E
> Sub Partitioning the parallel partitions
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: APEXCORE-501
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-501
> Project: Apache Apex Core
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Yogi Devendra
>
> Hi,
> I have a DAG A->B->C.
> 1. A is kafka input operator reading from 4 different topics configured with ONE_TO_ONE strategy. Thus creating 4 partitons of A.
> 2. B and C are configured to have parallel partitions w.r.t. their input port. Thus, currently both B, C have 4 partitions.
> I am observing B significant latency in B operator. Thus, would like to have 2 partitions for B per partition of A. Since, application is latency intensive, I want to avoid unifiers as far as possible.
> How to achieve this partitioning?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)