Why doesn't whitelist_from_rcvd work on this?

[Bret Miller <br...@wcg.org>]

I'm having trouble figuring out why my whitelist_from_rcvd statement
doesn't work on this message.

whitelist_from_rcvd DoNotReply@cems.wamu.com *.cems.wamu.com #Washington
Mutual Statements

Message Headers:
X-Spam-Tests: tests=AWL=0.427,BAYES_00=-2.599,DBL_12_LETTER_PGIMG=0.2,
	
HEADER_SPAM=3.789,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY=0.228,
	MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID=1.393,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.175,
	SARE_HTML_MANY_BR05=0.5;autolearn=no
X-Spam-Score: 4.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on
mail.hq.wcg.org
X-Spam-Level: ++++
X-TFF-CGPSA-Version: 1.6a5
X-WCG-CGPSA-Filter: Scanned
X-SPAM-FLAG: Yes
X-Deliver-To: xxxx@wcg.org
Return-Path: <Wa...@30c687-27c6f0.cems.wamu.com>
Received: from mtaw014.cems.wamu.com ([167.88.194.145] verified)
  by mail.wcg.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.5)
  with ESMTP id 20140775 for xxxx@wcg.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:58:33
-0800
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=mail.wcg.org; client-ip=167.88.194.145;
envelope-from=WashingtonMutual@30c687-27c6f0.cems.wamu.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NEXT_28374530"
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:56:59 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: DoNotReply@cems.wamu.net
Mime-Subversion: 30c687-27c6f0
From: "Washington Mutual" <Do...@cems.wamu.com>
To: xxxx@wcg.org
Subject: A New Statement is Ready
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Message-ID: <au...@mail.wcg.org>

In my debug output, I get:
[3260] dbg: received-header: parsed as [ ip=167.88.194.145
rdns=mtaw014.cems.wamu.com helo=mtaw014.cems.wamu.com by=mail.wcg.org
ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=20140775 auth= ]
[3260] dbg: received-header: relay 167.88.194.145 trusted? no internal?
No

So, to me, it looks like it parsed the received header just fine. The
from address matches, and the received mtaw013.cems.wamu.com should
match *.cems.wamu.com should it not?

What am I missing here?

Bret

RE: Why doesn't whitelist_from_rcvd work on this?

[Duane Hill <d....@yournetplus.com>]

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Gary V wrote:

>> I'm having trouble figuring out why my whitelist_from_rcvd statement
>> doesn't work on this message.
>> 
>> whitelist_from_rcvd DoNotReply@cems.wamu.com *.cems.wamu.com #Washington
>> Mutual Statements
>> 
>
>> In my debug output, I get:
>> [3260] dbg: received-header: parsed as [ ip=167.88.194.145
>> rdns=mtaw014.cems.wamu.com helo=mtaw014.cems.wamu.com by=mail.wcg.org
>> ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=20140775 auth= ]
>> [3260] dbg: received-header: relay 167.88.194.145 trusted? no internal?
>> No
>> 
>> So, to me, it looks like it parsed the received header just fine. The
>> from address matches, and the received mtaw013.cems.wamu.com should
>> match *.cems.wamu.com should it not?
>> 
>> What am I missing here?
>> 
>> Bret
>
> Try it without globbing the client:
> DoNotReply@cems.wamu.com cems.wamu.com
>
> Gary V

Correct. Documentation leads me to think the email address can be globbed 
but the host's reverse name can not based on the examples shown.

RE: Why doesn't whitelist_from_rcvd work on this?

[Gary V <mr...@hotmail.com>]

>I'm having trouble figuring out why my whitelist_from_rcvd statement
>doesn't work on this message.
>
>whitelist_from_rcvd DoNotReply@cems.wamu.com *.cems.wamu.com #Washington
>Mutual Statements
>

>In my debug output, I get:
>[3260] dbg: received-header: parsed as [ ip=167.88.194.145
>rdns=mtaw014.cems.wamu.com helo=mtaw014.cems.wamu.com by=mail.wcg.org
>ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=20140775 auth= ]
>[3260] dbg: received-header: relay 167.88.194.145 trusted? no internal?
>No
>
>So, to me, it looks like it parsed the received header just fine. The
>from address matches, and the received mtaw013.cems.wamu.com should
>match *.cems.wamu.com should it not?
>
>What am I missing here?
>
>Bret

Try it without globbing the client:
DoNotReply@cems.wamu.com cems.wamu.com

Gary V

_________________________________________________________________
Get a FREE Web site, company branded e-mail and more from Microsoft Office 
Live! http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/mcrssaub0050001411mrt/direct/01/