You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@felix.apache.org by Frank Langel <fr...@frankjlangel.com> on 2015/06/19 10:21:03 UTC
PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix - Anyone?
Hi,
Has anyone succeeded running PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix ? I am sure its doable, but
I was wondering if someone has made some notes (i.e. list of dependent
bundles) to ease the installation process.
Thanks in advance
Frank
Re: PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix - Anyone?
Posted by Frank Langel <fr...@frankjlangel.com>.
It is.
On 7/10/15, 2:38 PM, "Nick Baker" <nb...@pentaho.com> wrote:
>That is indeed awesome news :)
>
>-Nick
> Original Message
>From: Guillaume Nodet
>Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 4:14 PM
>To: users@felix.apache.org
>Reply To: users@felix.apache.org
>Subject: Re: PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix - Anyone?
>
>
>Fwiw, undertow supported is now available in pax-web master branch (6.x).
>
>2015-06-19 12:44 GMT+02:00 Frank Langel <fr...@frankjlangel.com>:
>
>> Thanks. Much appreciated
>>
>>
>> On 6/19/15, 12:36 PM, "Achim Nierbeck" <bc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Frank,
>> >
>> >that site is not correct I'll change it asap.
>> >Undertow is a special branch made by Harald, and I should have blocked
>>him
>> >in doing releases with the Pax-Web Versioning schema.
>> >It's been a test only releases that he made to play with Pax CDI on a
>> >green
>> >field. I did some investigation but the Pax-Web-Undertow branch is
>> >in no means compatible to the Pax-Web regular branches.
>> >That means till version 4.1.x Pax Web is clean and running with up to
>> >Servlet Support 3.1 including White-Board extender (which isn't
>>compatible
>> >to the R6 draft of a OSGi specified Whiteboard-Extension for
>>HttpService).
>> >With the 5.0 disaster Version 5 is burned for the Pax Web project
>> >therefore
>> >Version 6.0 (the current master) tries to pick up from the 4.x line
>>with
>> >the goal of having a OSGi R6 compliant Whiteboard Extender, which
>>actually
>> >removes lot's of the features Pax Web already supports. I'll try my
>>best
>> >to
>> >have the Old-Pax-Web-Style Whiteboard Extender working the same way it
>>is
>> >right now together with a stripped down R6 Compliant Whiteboard
>>Extender.
>> >Right now I don't have any plans on adding Undertow support to the
>>master
>> >branch. This might be an issue for a future version. Right now only
>>Jetty
>> >with all features and Tomcat with a slightly reduced set of features
>>are
>> >supported. For production use I still recommend to use Jetty.
>> >
>> >concerning the undertow-branch and whiteboard support, as I'm not
>>planning
>> >in putting any efforts into that branch I doubt there will be any
>>support
>> >for it.
>> >
>> >anyone with free time to spent on adding support for undertow into the
>>Pax
>> >Web 6.0.0 (current master) line is more then welcome to do so.
>> >As I only work on the Pax-Web project in my spare time (no funding at
>>all)
>> >resources are spare and therefore I focus on main issues.
>> >
>> >regards, Achim
>> >
>> >
>> >2015-06-19 12:06 GMT+02:00 Frank Langel <fr...@frankjlangel.com>:
>> >
>> >> Thanks a lot for the quick response.
>> >> - looking at the features file is a good suggestion, I should have
>> >>thought
>> >> of it in the first place
>> >> - I like to use and test undertow, so my understanding is I need to
>>use
>> >>MX
>> >> branch, which doesn¹t contain whiteboard extender which stops my
>>bundles
>> >> from working
>> >>
>> >> Allow the following questions
>> >> 1. Will the whiteboard extender be included in the MX Branch going
>> >>forward?
>> >> 2. What is the future of pax web 5+. As per the website, it says
>>that v5
>> >> and later, pax web will standardize on undertow. Is that
>>understanding
>> >>of
>> >> mine correct?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> Frank
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 6/19/15, 10:41 AM, "Achim Nierbeck" <bc...@googlemail.com>
>>wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> >first of all Pax-Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT and Pax-Web 5.0.0.Mx are
>> different.
>> >> >The Mx ones are the undertow branches which unfortunately got the
>> >>version
>> >> >and are completely different to the other versions of Pax-Web.
>> >> >One big difference that branch is missing the well-known Whiteboard
>> >> >Extender of the regular Pax-Web line.
>> >> >Just one note, due to this the current Master of Pax-Web is version
>>6.0
>> >> >and
>> >> >currently there is no plan on merging the undertow branch in to
>>master.
>> >> >So please beware in case you are betting on Undertow, you run
>>without
>> >> >support on it.
>> >> >
>> >> >Second, as all of the Pax-Web modules are usually tested with
>>Pax-Exam,
>> >> >they are known to work with different OSGi runtimes.
>> >> >So Felix and Equinox both run fine with Pax-Web.
>> >> >
>> >> >For a list of dependent bundles, take a look at the Karaf Features
>> >> >descriptor, it explicitly tells you which bundles are needed.
>> >> >
>> >> >Regards, Achim
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >2015-06-19 10:25 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>> >> >
>> >> >> You mean Pax Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards
>> >> >> JB
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 06/19/2015 10:21 AM, Frank Langel wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Hi,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Has anyone succeeded running PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix ? I am sure its
>> >> >>>doable,
>> >> >>> but
>> >> >>> I was wondering if someone has made some notes (i.e. list of
>> >>dependent
>> >> >>> bundles) to ease the installation process.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Thanks in advance
>> >> >>> Frank
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >> >> jbonofre@apache.org
>> >> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >--
>> >> >
>> >> >Apache Member
>> >> >Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> >> >OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>> >>Committer &
>> >> >Project Lead
>> >> >blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>> >> >Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>> >> >
>> >> >Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >
>> >Apache Member
>> >Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> >OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>>Committer &
>> >Project Lead
>> >blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>> >Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>> >
>> >Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix - Anyone?
Posted by Nick Baker <nb...@pentaho.com>.
That is indeed awesome news :)
-Nick
Original Message
From: Guillaume Nodet
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 4:14 PM
To: users@felix.apache.org
Reply To: users@felix.apache.org
Subject: Re: PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix - Anyone?
Fwiw, undertow supported is now available in pax-web master branch (6.x).
2015-06-19 12:44 GMT+02:00 Frank Langel <fr...@frankjlangel.com>:
> Thanks. Much appreciated
>
>
> On 6/19/15, 12:36 PM, "Achim Nierbeck" <bc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi Frank,
> >
> >that site is not correct I'll change it asap.
> >Undertow is a special branch made by Harald, and I should have blocked him
> >in doing releases with the Pax-Web Versioning schema.
> >It's been a test only releases that he made to play with Pax CDI on a
> >green
> >field. I did some investigation but the Pax-Web-Undertow branch is
> >in no means compatible to the Pax-Web regular branches.
> >That means till version 4.1.x Pax Web is clean and running with up to
> >Servlet Support 3.1 including White-Board extender (which isn't compatible
> >to the R6 draft of a OSGi specified Whiteboard-Extension for HttpService).
> >With the 5.0 disaster Version 5 is burned for the Pax Web project
> >therefore
> >Version 6.0 (the current master) tries to pick up from the 4.x line with
> >the goal of having a OSGi R6 compliant Whiteboard Extender, which actually
> >removes lot's of the features Pax Web already supports. I'll try my best
> >to
> >have the Old-Pax-Web-Style Whiteboard Extender working the same way it is
> >right now together with a stripped down R6 Compliant Whiteboard Extender.
> >Right now I don't have any plans on adding Undertow support to the master
> >branch. This might be an issue for a future version. Right now only Jetty
> >with all features and Tomcat with a slightly reduced set of features are
> >supported. For production use I still recommend to use Jetty.
> >
> >concerning the undertow-branch and whiteboard support, as I'm not planning
> >in putting any efforts into that branch I doubt there will be any support
> >for it.
> >
> >anyone with free time to spent on adding support for undertow into the Pax
> >Web 6.0.0 (current master) line is more then welcome to do so.
> >As I only work on the Pax-Web project in my spare time (no funding at all)
> >resources are spare and therefore I focus on main issues.
> >
> >regards, Achim
> >
> >
> >2015-06-19 12:06 GMT+02:00 Frank Langel <fr...@frankjlangel.com>:
> >
> >> Thanks a lot for the quick response.
> >> - looking at the features file is a good suggestion, I should have
> >>thought
> >> of it in the first place
> >> - I like to use and test undertow, so my understanding is I need to use
> >>MX
> >> branch, which doesn¹t contain whiteboard extender which stops my bundles
> >> from working
> >>
> >> Allow the following questions
> >> 1. Will the whiteboard extender be included in the MX Branch going
> >>forward?
> >> 2. What is the future of pax web 5+. As per the website, it says that v5
> >> and later, pax web will standardize on undertow. Is that understanding
> >>of
> >> mine correct?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Frank
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/19/15, 10:41 AM, "Achim Nierbeck" <bc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi,
> >> >
> >> >first of all Pax-Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT and Pax-Web 5.0.0.Mx are
> different.
> >> >The Mx ones are the undertow branches which unfortunately got the
> >>version
> >> >and are completely different to the other versions of Pax-Web.
> >> >One big difference that branch is missing the well-known Whiteboard
> >> >Extender of the regular Pax-Web line.
> >> >Just one note, due to this the current Master of Pax-Web is version 6.0
> >> >and
> >> >currently there is no plan on merging the undertow branch in to master.
> >> >So please beware in case you are betting on Undertow, you run without
> >> >support on it.
> >> >
> >> >Second, as all of the Pax-Web modules are usually tested with Pax-Exam,
> >> >they are known to work with different OSGi runtimes.
> >> >So Felix and Equinox both run fine with Pax-Web.
> >> >
> >> >For a list of dependent bundles, take a look at the Karaf Features
> >> >descriptor, it explicitly tells you which bundles are needed.
> >> >
> >> >Regards, Achim
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >2015-06-19 10:25 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
> >> >
> >> >> You mean Pax Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards
> >> >> JB
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On 06/19/2015 10:21 AM, Frank Langel wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Hi,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Has anyone succeeded running PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix ? I am sure its
> >> >>>doable,
> >> >>> but
> >> >>> I was wondering if someone has made some notes (i.e. list of
> >>dependent
> >> >>> bundles) to ease the installation process.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks in advance
> >> >>> Frank
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> >> jbonofre@apache.org
> >> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >> >>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >
> >> >Apache Member
> >> >Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> >> >OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> >>Committer &
> >> >Project Lead
> >> >blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> >> >Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
> >> >
> >> >Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Apache Member
> >Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> >OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
> >Project Lead
> >blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> >Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
> >
> >Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix - Anyone?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>.
Fwiw, undertow supported is now available in pax-web master branch (6.x).
2015-06-19 12:44 GMT+02:00 Frank Langel <fr...@frankjlangel.com>:
> Thanks. Much appreciated
>
>
> On 6/19/15, 12:36 PM, "Achim Nierbeck" <bc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi Frank,
> >
> >that site is not correct I'll change it asap.
> >Undertow is a special branch made by Harald, and I should have blocked him
> >in doing releases with the Pax-Web Versioning schema.
> >It's been a test only releases that he made to play with Pax CDI on a
> >green
> >field. I did some investigation but the Pax-Web-Undertow branch is
> >in no means compatible to the Pax-Web regular branches.
> >That means till version 4.1.x Pax Web is clean and running with up to
> >Servlet Support 3.1 including White-Board extender (which isn't compatible
> >to the R6 draft of a OSGi specified Whiteboard-Extension for HttpService).
> >With the 5.0 disaster Version 5 is burned for the Pax Web project
> >therefore
> >Version 6.0 (the current master) tries to pick up from the 4.x line with
> >the goal of having a OSGi R6 compliant Whiteboard Extender, which actually
> >removes lot's of the features Pax Web already supports. I'll try my best
> >to
> >have the Old-Pax-Web-Style Whiteboard Extender working the same way it is
> >right now together with a stripped down R6 Compliant Whiteboard Extender.
> >Right now I don't have any plans on adding Undertow support to the master
> >branch. This might be an issue for a future version. Right now only Jetty
> >with all features and Tomcat with a slightly reduced set of features are
> >supported. For production use I still recommend to use Jetty.
> >
> >concerning the undertow-branch and whiteboard support, as I'm not planning
> >in putting any efforts into that branch I doubt there will be any support
> >for it.
> >
> >anyone with free time to spent on adding support for undertow into the Pax
> >Web 6.0.0 (current master) line is more then welcome to do so.
> >As I only work on the Pax-Web project in my spare time (no funding at all)
> >resources are spare and therefore I focus on main issues.
> >
> >regards, Achim
> >
> >
> >2015-06-19 12:06 GMT+02:00 Frank Langel <fr...@frankjlangel.com>:
> >
> >> Thanks a lot for the quick response.
> >> - looking at the features file is a good suggestion, I should have
> >>thought
> >> of it in the first place
> >> - I like to use and test undertow, so my understanding is I need to use
> >>MX
> >> branch, which doesn¹t contain whiteboard extender which stops my bundles
> >> from working
> >>
> >> Allow the following questions
> >> 1. Will the whiteboard extender be included in the MX Branch going
> >>forward?
> >> 2. What is the future of pax web 5+. As per the website, it says that v5
> >> and later, pax web will standardize on undertow. Is that understanding
> >>of
> >> mine correct?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Frank
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/19/15, 10:41 AM, "Achim Nierbeck" <bc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi,
> >> >
> >> >first of all Pax-Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT and Pax-Web 5.0.0.Mx are
> different.
> >> >The Mx ones are the undertow branches which unfortunately got the
> >>version
> >> >and are completely different to the other versions of Pax-Web.
> >> >One big difference that branch is missing the well-known Whiteboard
> >> >Extender of the regular Pax-Web line.
> >> >Just one note, due to this the current Master of Pax-Web is version 6.0
> >> >and
> >> >currently there is no plan on merging the undertow branch in to master.
> >> >So please beware in case you are betting on Undertow, you run without
> >> >support on it.
> >> >
> >> >Second, as all of the Pax-Web modules are usually tested with Pax-Exam,
> >> >they are known to work with different OSGi runtimes.
> >> >So Felix and Equinox both run fine with Pax-Web.
> >> >
> >> >For a list of dependent bundles, take a look at the Karaf Features
> >> >descriptor, it explicitly tells you which bundles are needed.
> >> >
> >> >Regards, Achim
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >2015-06-19 10:25 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
> >> >
> >> >> You mean Pax Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards
> >> >> JB
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On 06/19/2015 10:21 AM, Frank Langel wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Hi,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Has anyone succeeded running PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix ? I am sure its
> >> >>>doable,
> >> >>> but
> >> >>> I was wondering if someone has made some notes (i.e. list of
> >>dependent
> >> >>> bundles) to ease the installation process.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks in advance
> >> >>> Frank
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> >> jbonofre@apache.org
> >> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >> >>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >
> >> >Apache Member
> >> >Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> >> >OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> >>Committer &
> >> >Project Lead
> >> >blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> >> >Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
> >> >
> >> >Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Apache Member
> >Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> >OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
> >Project Lead
> >blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> >Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
> >
> >Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>
>
Re: PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix - Anyone?
Posted by Frank Langel <fr...@frankjlangel.com>.
Thanks. Much appreciated
On 6/19/15, 12:36 PM, "Achim Nierbeck" <bc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>Hi Frank,
>
>that site is not correct I'll change it asap.
>Undertow is a special branch made by Harald, and I should have blocked him
>in doing releases with the Pax-Web Versioning schema.
>It's been a test only releases that he made to play with Pax CDI on a
>green
>field. I did some investigation but the Pax-Web-Undertow branch is
>in no means compatible to the Pax-Web regular branches.
>That means till version 4.1.x Pax Web is clean and running with up to
>Servlet Support 3.1 including White-Board extender (which isn't compatible
>to the R6 draft of a OSGi specified Whiteboard-Extension for HttpService).
>With the 5.0 disaster Version 5 is burned for the Pax Web project
>therefore
>Version 6.0 (the current master) tries to pick up from the 4.x line with
>the goal of having a OSGi R6 compliant Whiteboard Extender, which actually
>removes lot's of the features Pax Web already supports. I'll try my best
>to
>have the Old-Pax-Web-Style Whiteboard Extender working the same way it is
>right now together with a stripped down R6 Compliant Whiteboard Extender.
>Right now I don't have any plans on adding Undertow support to the master
>branch. This might be an issue for a future version. Right now only Jetty
>with all features and Tomcat with a slightly reduced set of features are
>supported. For production use I still recommend to use Jetty.
>
>concerning the undertow-branch and whiteboard support, as I'm not planning
>in putting any efforts into that branch I doubt there will be any support
>for it.
>
>anyone with free time to spent on adding support for undertow into the Pax
>Web 6.0.0 (current master) line is more then welcome to do so.
>As I only work on the Pax-Web project in my spare time (no funding at all)
>resources are spare and therefore I focus on main issues.
>
>regards, Achim
>
>
>2015-06-19 12:06 GMT+02:00 Frank Langel <fr...@frankjlangel.com>:
>
>> Thanks a lot for the quick response.
>> - looking at the features file is a good suggestion, I should have
>>thought
>> of it in the first place
>> - I like to use and test undertow, so my understanding is I need to use
>>MX
>> branch, which doesn¹t contain whiteboard extender which stops my bundles
>> from working
>>
>> Allow the following questions
>> 1. Will the whiteboard extender be included in the MX Branch going
>>forward?
>> 2. What is the future of pax web 5+. As per the website, it says that v5
>> and later, pax web will standardize on undertow. Is that understanding
>>of
>> mine correct?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Frank
>>
>>
>> On 6/19/15, 10:41 AM, "Achim Nierbeck" <bc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >first of all Pax-Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT and Pax-Web 5.0.0.Mx are different.
>> >The Mx ones are the undertow branches which unfortunately got the
>>version
>> >and are completely different to the other versions of Pax-Web.
>> >One big difference that branch is missing the well-known Whiteboard
>> >Extender of the regular Pax-Web line.
>> >Just one note, due to this the current Master of Pax-Web is version 6.0
>> >and
>> >currently there is no plan on merging the undertow branch in to master.
>> >So please beware in case you are betting on Undertow, you run without
>> >support on it.
>> >
>> >Second, as all of the Pax-Web modules are usually tested with Pax-Exam,
>> >they are known to work with different OSGi runtimes.
>> >So Felix and Equinox both run fine with Pax-Web.
>> >
>> >For a list of dependent bundles, take a look at the Karaf Features
>> >descriptor, it explicitly tells you which bundles are needed.
>> >
>> >Regards, Achim
>> >
>> >
>> >2015-06-19 10:25 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>> >
>> >> You mean Pax Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> JB
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 06/19/2015 10:21 AM, Frank Langel wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> Has anyone succeeded running PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix ? I am sure its
>> >>>doable,
>> >>> but
>> >>> I was wondering if someone has made some notes (i.e. list of
>>dependent
>> >>> bundles) to ease the installation process.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks in advance
>> >>> Frank
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> --
>> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >> jbonofre@apache.org
>> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >
>> >Apache Member
>> >Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> >OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>>Committer &
>> >Project Lead
>> >blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>> >Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>> >
>> >Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>
>Apache Member
>Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
>Project Lead
>blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>
>Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix - Anyone?
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Frank,
that site is not correct I'll change it asap.
Undertow is a special branch made by Harald, and I should have blocked him
in doing releases with the Pax-Web Versioning schema.
It's been a test only releases that he made to play with Pax CDI on a green
field. I did some investigation but the Pax-Web-Undertow branch is
in no means compatible to the Pax-Web regular branches.
That means till version 4.1.x Pax Web is clean and running with up to
Servlet Support 3.1 including White-Board extender (which isn't compatible
to the R6 draft of a OSGi specified Whiteboard-Extension for HttpService).
With the 5.0 disaster Version 5 is burned for the Pax Web project therefore
Version 6.0 (the current master) tries to pick up from the 4.x line with
the goal of having a OSGi R6 compliant Whiteboard Extender, which actually
removes lot's of the features Pax Web already supports. I'll try my best to
have the Old-Pax-Web-Style Whiteboard Extender working the same way it is
right now together with a stripped down R6 Compliant Whiteboard Extender.
Right now I don't have any plans on adding Undertow support to the master
branch. This might be an issue for a future version. Right now only Jetty
with all features and Tomcat with a slightly reduced set of features are
supported. For production use I still recommend to use Jetty.
concerning the undertow-branch and whiteboard support, as I'm not planning
in putting any efforts into that branch I doubt there will be any support
for it.
anyone with free time to spent on adding support for undertow into the Pax
Web 6.0.0 (current master) line is more then welcome to do so.
As I only work on the Pax-Web project in my spare time (no funding at all)
resources are spare and therefore I focus on main issues.
regards, Achim
2015-06-19 12:06 GMT+02:00 Frank Langel <fr...@frankjlangel.com>:
> Thanks a lot for the quick response.
> - looking at the features file is a good suggestion, I should have thought
> of it in the first place
> - I like to use and test undertow, so my understanding is I need to use MX
> branch, which doesn¹t contain whiteboard extender which stops my bundles
> from working
>
> Allow the following questions
> 1. Will the whiteboard extender be included in the MX Branch going forward?
> 2. What is the future of pax web 5+. As per the website, it says that v5
> and later, pax web will standardize on undertow. Is that understanding of
> mine correct?
>
> Thanks
> Frank
>
>
> On 6/19/15, 10:41 AM, "Achim Nierbeck" <bc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >first of all Pax-Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT and Pax-Web 5.0.0.Mx are different.
> >The Mx ones are the undertow branches which unfortunately got the version
> >and are completely different to the other versions of Pax-Web.
> >One big difference that branch is missing the well-known Whiteboard
> >Extender of the regular Pax-Web line.
> >Just one note, due to this the current Master of Pax-Web is version 6.0
> >and
> >currently there is no plan on merging the undertow branch in to master.
> >So please beware in case you are betting on Undertow, you run without
> >support on it.
> >
> >Second, as all of the Pax-Web modules are usually tested with Pax-Exam,
> >they are known to work with different OSGi runtimes.
> >So Felix and Equinox both run fine with Pax-Web.
> >
> >For a list of dependent bundles, take a look at the Karaf Features
> >descriptor, it explicitly tells you which bundles are needed.
> >
> >Regards, Achim
> >
> >
> >2015-06-19 10:25 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
> >
> >> You mean Pax Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>
> >> On 06/19/2015 10:21 AM, Frank Langel wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Has anyone succeeded running PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix ? I am sure its
> >>>doable,
> >>> but
> >>> I was wondering if someone has made some notes (i.e. list of dependent
> >>> bundles) to ease the installation process.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance
> >>> Frank
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> jbonofre@apache.org
> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Apache Member
> >Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> >OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
> >Project Lead
> >blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> >Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
> >
> >Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>
>
--
Apache Member
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
Re: PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix - Anyone?
Posted by Frank Langel <fr...@frankjlangel.com>.
Thanks a lot for the quick response.
- looking at the features file is a good suggestion, I should have thought
of it in the first place
- I like to use and test undertow, so my understanding is I need to use MX
branch, which doesn¹t contain whiteboard extender which stops my bundles
from working
Allow the following questions
1. Will the whiteboard extender be included in the MX Branch going forward?
2. What is the future of pax web 5+. As per the website, it says that v5
and later, pax web will standardize on undertow. Is that understanding of
mine correct?
Thanks
Frank
On 6/19/15, 10:41 AM, "Achim Nierbeck" <bc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>first of all Pax-Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT and Pax-Web 5.0.0.Mx are different.
>The Mx ones are the undertow branches which unfortunately got the version
>and are completely different to the other versions of Pax-Web.
>One big difference that branch is missing the well-known Whiteboard
>Extender of the regular Pax-Web line.
>Just one note, due to this the current Master of Pax-Web is version 6.0
>and
>currently there is no plan on merging the undertow branch in to master.
>So please beware in case you are betting on Undertow, you run without
>support on it.
>
>Second, as all of the Pax-Web modules are usually tested with Pax-Exam,
>they are known to work with different OSGi runtimes.
>So Felix and Equinox both run fine with Pax-Web.
>
>For a list of dependent bundles, take a look at the Karaf Features
>descriptor, it explicitly tells you which bundles are needed.
>
>Regards, Achim
>
>
>2015-06-19 10:25 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>
>> You mean Pax Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 06/19/2015 10:21 AM, Frank Langel wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Has anyone succeeded running PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix ? I am sure its
>>>doable,
>>> but
>>> I was wondering if someone has made some notes (i.e. list of dependent
>>> bundles) to ease the installation process.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>
>Apache Member
>Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
>Project Lead
>blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>
>Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix - Anyone?
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
first of all Pax-Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT and Pax-Web 5.0.0.Mx are different.
The Mx ones are the undertow branches which unfortunately got the version
and are completely different to the other versions of Pax-Web.
One big difference that branch is missing the well-known Whiteboard
Extender of the regular Pax-Web line.
Just one note, due to this the current Master of Pax-Web is version 6.0 and
currently there is no plan on merging the undertow branch in to master.
So please beware in case you are betting on Undertow, you run without
support on it.
Second, as all of the Pax-Web modules are usually tested with Pax-Exam,
they are known to work with different OSGi runtimes.
So Felix and Equinox both run fine with Pax-Web.
For a list of dependent bundles, take a look at the Karaf Features
descriptor, it explicitly tells you which bundles are needed.
Regards, Achim
2015-06-19 10:25 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
> You mean Pax Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 06/19/2015 10:21 AM, Frank Langel wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has anyone succeeded running PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix ? I am sure its doable,
>> but
>> I was wondering if someone has made some notes (i.e. list of dependent
>> bundles) to ease the installation process.
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>> Frank
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>
>
--
Apache Member
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
Re: PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix - Anyone?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
You mean Pax Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
Regards
JB
On 06/19/2015 10:21 AM, Frank Langel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone succeeded running PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix ? I am sure its doable, but
> I was wondering if someone has made some notes (i.e. list of dependent
> bundles) to ease the installation process.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Frank
>
>
>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org