You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to l10n@openoffice.apache.org by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com> on 2014/08/11 10:53:16 UTC

[RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Hi,

I would like to propose RC2 based on revision 1616946 from the AOO410
branch. The build is ongoing and I expect to have the builds available
tomorrow or on Wednesday.

Further details later ...

Juergen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: l10n-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: l10n-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>.
On 12/08/14 15:56, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:33:44PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> Every time when I want to download a new version I'm searching for
>>> the right language. In the tables there is "German (de)" located
>>> between "Czech (cs)" and "Danish (da)".
>>>
>>> But: Czech < Danish < German and: cs < da < de.
>>>
>>> Could the first column be split into one column for the language
>>> name and one for the ISO-code and the tables sorted by one of this
>>> columns?
>>>
>>> This would the find make much easier.
>>
>> it could but confluence is a piece of shit and I have to save so many
>> times until it is really saved correct that I personally don't have
>> interest to edit it for now.
> 
> I can't recall if this was discussed before, but what is the reason not
> to use https://wiki.openoffice.org instead of confluence?

well I noticed the problems during the last and this release and I have
already planned to move to mediawiki in the future. I should have done
thins already but I haven't :-(

Juergen



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:33:44PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > Every time when I want to download a new version I'm searching for
> > the right language. In the tables there is "German (de)" located
> > between "Czech (cs)" and "Danish (da)".
> > 
> > But: Czech < Danish < German and: cs < da < de.
> > 
> > Could the first column be split into one column for the language
> > name and one for the ISO-code and the tables sorted by one of this
> > columns?
> > 
> > This would the find make much easier.
> 
> it could but confluence is a piece of shit and I have to save so many
> times until it is really saved correct that I personally don't have
> interest to edit it for now.

I can't recall if this was discussed before, but what is the reason not
to use https://wiki.openoffice.org instead of confluence?


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina

Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Mathias Röllig <mr...@gmx.net>.
>> Could the first column be split into one column for the language name
>> and one for the ISO-code and the tables sorted by one of this columns?
>>
>> This would the find make much easier.
>
> it could but confluence is a piece of shit and I have to save so many
> times until it is really saved correct that I personally don't have
> interest to edit it for now.
>
> For the future it can be taken into account.

Thank you.

Now I located the mouse cursor at first time over the heading row of the 
table and found the (hidden) sort buttons (arrows). :-)

One click at "Language" and
Galician (gl) < German (de) < Greek (el)

It's the better view.

Maybe that
<table class="confluenceTable tablesorter"><thead><tr 
class="sortableHeader"><th data-column="0" class="confluenceTh 
sortableHeader tablesorter-headerSortDown">
could be defined and saved as default.


Greetings, Mathias

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org>.
On 12/08/2014 Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>> On 2014-08-12, at 08:33, Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> it could but confluence is a piece of shit and I have to save so many
>> times until it is really saved correct that I personally don't have
>> interest to edit it for now.
> Do you know if a bug report has been filed against this with Atlasssian?

They know. They even have blog posts out: 
http://blogs.atlassian.com/2011/11/why-we-removed-wiki-markup-editor-in-confluence-4/ 
; fact is, imposing a WYSIWYG editor is fine in many cases, but not if 
one has to prepare a huge table built in large part by a script.

Regards,
   Andrea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Louis Suárez-Potts <lu...@gmail.com>.
> On 2014-08-12, at 08:33, Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> it could but confluence is a piece of shit and I have to save so many
> times until it is really saved correct that I personally don't have
> interest to edit it for now.

Do you know if a bug report has been filed against this with Atlasssian?

My reason for asking: Confluence is used by a gazillion open source projects. This is an annoying bug, clearly.

louis


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>.
On 12/08/14 13:32, Mathias Röllig wrote:
>> The RC2 is now available under
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>
> 
> 
> Every time when I want to download a new version I'm searching for the
> right language. In the tables there is "German (de)" located between
> "Czech (cs)" and "Danish (da)".
> 
> But: Czech < Danish < German
> and: cs < da < de.
> 
> Could the first column be split into one column for the language name
> and one for the ISO-code and the tables sorted by one of this columns?
> 
> This would the find make much easier.

it could but confluence is a piece of shit and I have to save so many
times until it is really saved correct that I personally don't have
interest to edit it for now.

For the future it can be taken into account.

Juergen


> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Mathias
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Mathias Röllig <mr...@gmx.net>.
> The RC2 is now available under
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds


Every time when I want to download a new version I'm searching for the 
right language. In the tables there is "German (de)" located between 
"Czech (cs)" and "Danish (da)".

But: Czech < Danish < German
and: cs < da < de.

Could the first column be split into one column for the language name 
and one for the ISO-code and the tables sorted by one of this columns?

This would the find make much easier.

Thank you.

Mathias

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>.
The RC2 is now available under
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds

An overview of fixed issues can be found under
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/milestones/4.1.1-rc2-r1616946/AOO4.1.1_fixes.html

I plan to start the vote tomorrow.

Juergen

On 11/08/14 10:53, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to propose RC2 based on revision 1616946 from the AOO410
> branch. The build is ongoing and I expect to have the builds available
> tomorrow or on Wednesday.
> 
> Further details later ...
> 
> Juergen
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>.
On 13/08/14 18:03, Kay Schenk wrote:
> 
> 
> On 08/13/2014 12:21 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 13/08/14 08:55, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 12.08.2014 21:45, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 08/11/2014 01:53 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to propose RC2 based on revision 1616946 from the AOO410
>>>>> branch. The build is ongoing and I expect to have the builds available
>>>>> tomorrow or on Wednesday.
>>>>>
>>>>> Further details later ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Juergen
>>>>
>>>> My current RC1 build has this information --
>>>> AOO411m4(Build:9774)  -  Rev. 1614049
>>>> 2014-07-28 17:54 - Linux i686
>>>>
>>>> Proposed RC2 has build number of 9757 so it will not update RC1.
>>>>
>>>> Is the build number for RC2 correct?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The build number is not correct. It should be 9775.
>>> Murphy caused a typo in the corresponding change to
>>> main/solenv/inc/minor.mk on branch AOO410.
>>>
>>> I propose to correct the build number - I will do the commit - and to
>>> rebuild RC2
>>
>> I have corrected my mistake and will do a RC3 to avoid confusion. RC2 is
>> already uploaded and I have to tweak the wiki anyway (grrr)
>>
>>
>> Juergen
> 
> Thanks Juergen and Oliver....sorry I didn't notice this sooner in the
> commits log.

no problem, that's life. My mistake and I had the work to do ;-) But the
upload is nearly finished ... I have now to fight with the wiki ones
again. The next time I would use mediawiki.

Juergen

> 
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards, Oliver.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.

On 08/13/2014 12:21 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 13/08/14 08:55, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 12.08.2014 21:45, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/11/2014 01:53 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to propose RC2 based on revision 1616946 from the AOO410
>>>> branch. The build is ongoing and I expect to have the builds available
>>>> tomorrow or on Wednesday.
>>>>
>>>> Further details later ...
>>>>
>>>> Juergen
>>>
>>> My current RC1 build has this information --
>>> AOO411m4(Build:9774)  -  Rev. 1614049
>>> 2014-07-28 17:54 - Linux i686
>>>
>>> Proposed RC2 has build number of 9757 so it will not update RC1.
>>>
>>> Is the build number for RC2 correct?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The build number is not correct. It should be 9775.
>> Murphy caused a typo in the corresponding change to
>> main/solenv/inc/minor.mk on branch AOO410.
>>
>> I propose to correct the build number - I will do the commit - and to
>> rebuild RC2
> 
> I have corrected my mistake and will do a RC3 to avoid confusion. RC2 is
> already uploaded and I have to tweak the wiki anyway (grrr)
> 
> 
> Juergen

Thanks Juergen and Oliver....sorry I didn't notice this sooner in the
commits log.

> 
>>
>> Best regards, Oliver.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> 

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"For evil to flourish, it only requires good men to do nothing."
                                   -- Simon Wiesenthal

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>.
On 13/08/14 08:55, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 12.08.2014 21:45, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/11/2014 01:53 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to propose RC2 based on revision 1616946 from the AOO410
>>> branch. The build is ongoing and I expect to have the builds available
>>> tomorrow or on Wednesday.
>>>
>>> Further details later ...
>>>
>>> Juergen
>>
>> My current RC1 build has this information --
>> AOO411m4(Build:9774)  -  Rev. 1614049
>> 2014-07-28 17:54 - Linux i686
>>
>> Proposed RC2 has build number of 9757 so it will not update RC1.
>>
>> Is the build number for RC2 correct?
>>
>>
> 
> The build number is not correct. It should be 9775.
> Murphy caused a typo in the corresponding change to
> main/solenv/inc/minor.mk on branch AOO410.
> 
> I propose to correct the build number - I will do the commit - and to
> rebuild RC2

I have corrected my mistake and will do a RC3 to avoid confusion. RC2 is
already uploaded and I have to tweak the wiki anyway (grrr)


Juergen

> 
> Best regards, Oliver.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <or...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,

On 12.08.2014 21:45, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 08/11/2014 01:53 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose RC2 based on revision 1616946 from the AOO410
>> branch. The build is ongoing and I expect to have the builds available
>> tomorrow or on Wednesday.
>>
>> Further details later ...
>>
>> Juergen
>
> My current RC1 build has this information --
> AOO411m4(Build:9774)  -  Rev. 1614049
> 2014-07-28 17:54 - Linux i686
>
> Proposed RC2 has build number of 9757 so it will not update RC1.
>
> Is the build number for RC2 correct?
>
>

The build number is not correct. It should be 9775.
Murphy caused a typo in the corresponding change to 
main/solenv/inc/minor.mk on branch AOO410.

I propose to correct the build number - I will do the commit - and to 
rebuild RC2

Best regards, Oliver.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>.
On 12/08/14 23:42, Kay Schenk wrote:
> 
> 
> On 08/12/2014 02:20 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 12:45:36 -0700
>> Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/11/2014 01:53 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to propose RC2 based on revision 1616946 from the AOO410
>>>> branch. The build is ongoing and I expect to have the builds available
>>>> tomorrow or on Wednesday.
>>>>
>>>> Further details later ...
>>>>
>>>> Juergen
>>>
>>> My current RC1 build has this information --
>>> AOO411m4(Build:9774)  -  Rev. 1614049
>>> 2014-07-28 17:54 - Linux i686
>>>
>>> Proposed RC2 has build number of 9757 so it will not update RC1.
>>>
>>> Is the build number for RC2 correct?
>>>
>>
>> On linux 64bit (deb) the 9757 build installed without problems and overwrote RC1 with no complaints on my PC.
>>
> 
> I'm using rpm. Typically I try to do an update rather than force what
> rpm thinks is an older version over a newer one -- in this case, 9757
> over 9774. Maybe this was just a digit transposition case.
> 
> All was fine with previous milestones until today. It would be nice for
> rpm users if this could be fixed.

you are correct, my mistake with this stupid build number. I switched 5
and 7 in one place. I have to repackage the binaries ... Please stay tuned

Juergen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.

On 08/12/2014 02:20 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 12:45:36 -0700
> Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> On 08/11/2014 01:53 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to propose RC2 based on revision 1616946 from the AOO410
>>> branch. The build is ongoing and I expect to have the builds available
>>> tomorrow or on Wednesday.
>>>
>>> Further details later ...
>>>
>>> Juergen
>>
>> My current RC1 build has this information --
>> AOO411m4(Build:9774)  -  Rev. 1614049
>> 2014-07-28 17:54 - Linux i686
>>
>> Proposed RC2 has build number of 9757 so it will not update RC1.
>>
>> Is the build number for RC2 correct?
>>
> 
> On linux 64bit (deb) the 9757 build installed without problems and overwrote RC1 with no complaints on my PC.
> 

I'm using rpm. Typically I try to do an update rather than force what
rpm thinks is an older version over a newer one -- in this case, 9757
over 9774. Maybe this was just a digit transposition case.

All was fine with previous milestones until today. It would be nice for
rpm users if this could be fixed.


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"For evil to flourish, it only requires good men to do nothing."
                                   -- Simon Wiesenthal

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Rory O'Farrell <of...@iol.ie>.
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 12:45:36 -0700
Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 08/11/2014 01:53 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I would like to propose RC2 based on revision 1616946 from the AOO410
> > branch. The build is ongoing and I expect to have the builds available
> > tomorrow or on Wednesday.
> > 
> > Further details later ...
> > 
> > Juergen
> 
> My current RC1 build has this information --
> AOO411m4(Build:9774)  -  Rev. 1614049
> 2014-07-28 17:54 - Linux i686
> 
> Proposed RC2 has build number of 9757 so it will not update RC1.
> 
> Is the build number for RC2 correct?
> 

On linux 64bit (deb) the 9757 build installed without problems and overwrote RC1 with no complaints on my PC.

-- 
Rory O'Farrell <of...@iol.ie>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.

On 08/11/2014 01:53 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to propose RC2 based on revision 1616946 from the AOO410
> branch. The build is ongoing and I expect to have the builds available
> tomorrow or on Wednesday.
> 
> Further details later ...
> 
> Juergen

My current RC1 build has this information --
AOO411m4(Build:9774)  -  Rev. 1614049
2014-07-28 17:54 - Linux i686

Proposed RC2 has build number of 9757 so it will not update RC1.

Is the build number for RC2 correct?


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"For evil to flourish, it only requires good men to do nothing."
                                   -- Simon Wiesenthal

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com>.
Hi Juergen, all

Build 1616946 is already available from the Nightly page.

I assume this is *exactly* the same (AOO411m5(Build:9757)  -  Rev. 1616946)
as the one you are building now and therefore testers who have installed
the Nightly have no need to download the en_US (or de) version again?

Pedro

Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>.
The RC2 is now available under
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds

An overview of fixed issues can be found under
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/milestones/4.1.1-rc2-r1616946/AOO4.1.1_fixes.html

I plan to start the vote tomorrow.

Juergen

On 11/08/14 10:53, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to propose RC2 based on revision 1616946 from the AOO410
> branch. The build is ongoing and I expect to have the builds available
> tomorrow or on Wednesday.
> 
> Further details later ...
> 
> Juergen
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: l10n-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: l10n-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC2 on revision 1616946

Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>.
The RC2 is now available under
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds

An overview of fixed issues can be found under
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/milestones/4.1.1-rc2-r1616946/AOO4.1.1_fixes.html

I plan to start the vote tomorrow.

Juergen

On 11/08/14 10:53, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to propose RC2 based on revision 1616946 from the AOO410
> branch. The build is ongoing and I expect to have the builds available
> tomorrow or on Wednesday.
> 
> Further details later ...
> 
> Juergen
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org