You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> on 2007/07/03 17:18:44 UTC
Re: wsdl2java ant task
Wouldn't it be nice if we had some pre-bundled ant tasks for people instead
of a macro thingy (IIRC) which they cut and paste? Or am I missing out on
some huge advantage of what we currently have?
On 7/3/07, Glynn, Eoghan <eo...@iona.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> See distribution/src/main/release/samples/common_build.xml
>
> /Eoghan
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Guy Pardon [mailto:guy.pardon@atomikos.com]
> > Sent: 03 July 2007 13:07
> > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: wsdl2java ant task
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there a wsdl2java ant task around?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Guy
> >
>
> ----------------------------
> IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
> Registered Number: 171387
> Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland
>
--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
Re: wsdl2java ant task
Posted by James Mao <ja...@iona.com>.
DanD,
You are right, I'm just going to add ant tasks for tools, and I knew
DanK already did some work for it.
I planed to add those ant tasks into our code base.
James
> Wouldn't it be nice if we had some pre-bundled ant tasks for people
> instead
> of a macro thingy (IIRC) which they cut and paste? Or am I missing out on
> some huge advantage of what we currently have?
>
> On 7/3/07, Glynn, Eoghan <eo...@iona.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> See distribution/src/main/release/samples/common_build.xml
>>
>> /Eoghan
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Guy Pardon [mailto:guy.pardon@atomikos.com]
>> > Sent: 03 July 2007 13:07
>> > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
>> > Subject: wsdl2java ant task
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > is there a wsdl2java ant task around?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Guy
>> >
>>
>> ----------------------------
>> IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
>> Registered Number: 171387
>> Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4,
>> Ireland
>>
>
>
>
Re: wsdl2java ant task
Posted by James Mao <ja...@iona.com>.
Haha, DanD you already got the answer here.
James
> I've attached the source of the anttasks we use for the wiring into the
> TCK. It could definitely be used as a starting point for something
> more complete. It basically just "mimics" the RI ant tasks so all the
> docs for those should apply (within the limits of CXFs tools).
>
> The main thing I don't really like about it are:
> 1) The RI has a bunch of flags that don't make sense for our tools.
> Thus, the antasks have a bunch of fields and stuff that just don't do
> anything.
>
> 2) I really am not a fan of "wsimport" and "wsgen" as the
> names. "wsdl2java" and "java2wsdl" seem to make more sense to me, but
> it probably doesn't really matter.
>
>
> In anycase, if someone wanted to take this on and maybe use this as a
> starting point, I'm OK with that.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Tuesday 03 July 2007 11:18, Dan Diephouse wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't it be nice if we had some pre-bundled ant tasks for people
>> instead of a macro thingy (IIRC) which they cut and paste? Or am I
>> missing out on some huge advantage of what we currently have?
>>
>> On 7/3/07, Glynn, Eoghan <eo...@iona.com> wrote:
>>
>>> See distribution/src/main/release/samples/common_build.xml
>>>
>>> /Eoghan
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Guy Pardon [mailto:guy.pardon@atomikos.com]
>>>> Sent: 03 July 2007 13:07
>>>> To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: wsdl2java ant task
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> is there a wsdl2java ant task around?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Guy
>>>>
>>> ----------------------------
>>> IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
>>> Registered Number: 171387
>>> Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4,
>>> Ireland
>>>
>
>
Re: wsdl2java ant task
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
I'm actually wondering if it would make sense to have both the
wsimport/wsgen tasks and the w2j/j2w tasks. Thus, for people coming
from the Sun RI, things would be easy. For people starting fresh or
coming from Axis or similar, thing would also make sense.
Basically, take the code I had for calling the tools, push it up into
abstract base classes, and have subclasses to map the flags
appropriately.
Dan
On Tuesday 03 July 2007 23:50, Glen Mazza wrote:
> Another option would be to remain with the standard RI options[1][2]
> but just use the more intuitive Axis names of "wsdl2java" and
> "java2wsdl", which would take care of the second concern Dan mentioned
> below.
>
> Glen
>
> [1] http://java.sun.com/webservices/docs/2.0/jaxws/wsgen.html
> [2] http://java.sun.com/webservices/docs/2.0/jaxws/wsimport.html
>
> Am Dienstag, den 03.07.2007, 13:45 -0400 schrieb Glen Mazza:
> > It might be useful to incorporate Axis' WSDL2Java[1] here, at least
> > have the same (where applicable) settings and options (even if the
> > underlying code needs to change), so users can move between the two
> > with less difficulty.
> >
> > Both Apache Axis and Apache CXF code are owned by the Apache
> > Software Foundation, so there shouldn't be a legal headache involved
> > if we did this. Thoughts?
> >
> > Glen
> >
> > [1] http://ws.apache.org/axis2/tools/1_2/CodegenToolReference.html
> >
> > Am Dienstag, den 03.07.2007, 11:30 -0400 schrieb Daniel Kulp:
> > > I've attached the source of the anttasks we use for the wiring
> > > into the TCK. It could definitely be used as a starting point
> > > for something more complete. It basically just "mimics" the RI
> > > ant tasks so all the docs for those should apply (within the
> > > limits of CXFs tools).
> > >
> > > The main thing I don't really like about it are:
> > > 1) The RI has a bunch of flags that don't make sense for our
> > > tools. Thus, the antasks have a bunch of fields and stuff that
> > > just don't do anything.
> > >
> > > 2) I really am not a fan of "wsimport" and "wsgen" as the
> > > names. "wsdl2java" and "java2wsdl" seem to make more sense to
> > > me, but it probably doesn't really matter.
> > >
> > >
> > > In anycase, if someone wanted to take this on and maybe use this
> > > as a starting point, I'm OK with that.
> > >
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 03 July 2007 11:18, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > > > Wouldn't it be nice if we had some pre-bundled ant tasks for
> > > > people instead of a macro thingy (IIRC) which they cut and
> > > > paste? Or am I missing out on some huge advantage of what we
> > > > currently have?
> > > >
> > > > On 7/3/07, Glynn, Eoghan <eo...@iona.com> wrote:
> > > > > See distribution/src/main/release/samples/common_build.xml
> > > > >
> > > > > /Eoghan
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Guy Pardon [mailto:guy.pardon@atomikos.com]
> > > > > > Sent: 03 July 2007 13:07
> > > > > > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > Subject: wsdl2java ant task
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > is there a wsdl2java ant task around?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Guy
> > > > >
> > > > > ----------------------------
> > > > > IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
> > > > > Registered Number: 171387
> > > > > Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin
> > > > > 4, Ireland
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: wsdl2java ant task
Posted by Glen Mazza <gl...@verizon.net>.
Another option would be to remain with the standard RI options[1][2] but
just use the more intuitive Axis names of "wsdl2java" and "java2wsdl",
which would take care of the second concern Dan mentioned below.
Glen
[1] http://java.sun.com/webservices/docs/2.0/jaxws/wsgen.html
[2] http://java.sun.com/webservices/docs/2.0/jaxws/wsimport.html
Am Dienstag, den 03.07.2007, 13:45 -0400 schrieb Glen Mazza:
> It might be useful to incorporate Axis' WSDL2Java[1] here, at least have
> the same (where applicable) settings and options (even if the underlying
> code needs to change), so users can move between the two with less
> difficulty.
>
> Both Apache Axis and Apache CXF code are owned by the Apache Software
> Foundation, so there shouldn't be a legal headache involved if we did
> this. Thoughts?
>
> Glen
>
> [1] http://ws.apache.org/axis2/tools/1_2/CodegenToolReference.html
>
>
>
> Am Dienstag, den 03.07.2007, 11:30 -0400 schrieb Daniel Kulp:
> > I've attached the source of the anttasks we use for the wiring into the
> > TCK. It could definitely be used as a starting point for something
> > more complete. It basically just "mimics" the RI ant tasks so all the
> > docs for those should apply (within the limits of CXFs tools).
> >
> > The main thing I don't really like about it are:
> > 1) The RI has a bunch of flags that don't make sense for our tools.
> > Thus, the antasks have a bunch of fields and stuff that just don't do
> > anything.
> >
> > 2) I really am not a fan of "wsimport" and "wsgen" as the
> > names. "wsdl2java" and "java2wsdl" seem to make more sense to me, but
> > it probably doesn't really matter.
> >
> >
> > In anycase, if someone wanted to take this on and maybe use this as a
> > starting point, I'm OK with that.
> >
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday 03 July 2007 11:18, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > > Wouldn't it be nice if we had some pre-bundled ant tasks for people
> > > instead of a macro thingy (IIRC) which they cut and paste? Or am I
> > > missing out on some huge advantage of what we currently have?
> > >
> > > On 7/3/07, Glynn, Eoghan <eo...@iona.com> wrote:
> > > > See distribution/src/main/release/samples/common_build.xml
> > > >
> > > > /Eoghan
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Guy Pardon [mailto:guy.pardon@atomikos.com]
> > > > > Sent: 03 July 2007 13:07
> > > > > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: wsdl2java ant task
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > is there a wsdl2java ant task around?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Guy
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------------
> > > > IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
> > > > Registered Number: 171387
> > > > Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4,
> > > > Ireland
> >
>
Re: wsdl2java ant task
Posted by Glen Mazza <gl...@verizon.net>.
It might be useful to incorporate Axis' WSDL2Java[1] here, at least have
the same (where applicable) settings and options (even if the underlying
code needs to change), so users can move between the two with less
difficulty.
Both Apache Axis and Apache CXF code are owned by the Apache Software
Foundation, so there shouldn't be a legal headache involved if we did
this. Thoughts?
Glen
[1] http://ws.apache.org/axis2/tools/1_2/CodegenToolReference.html
Am Dienstag, den 03.07.2007, 11:30 -0400 schrieb Daniel Kulp:
> I've attached the source of the anttasks we use for the wiring into the
> TCK. It could definitely be used as a starting point for something
> more complete. It basically just "mimics" the RI ant tasks so all the
> docs for those should apply (within the limits of CXFs tools).
>
> The main thing I don't really like about it are:
> 1) The RI has a bunch of flags that don't make sense for our tools.
> Thus, the antasks have a bunch of fields and stuff that just don't do
> anything.
>
> 2) I really am not a fan of "wsimport" and "wsgen" as the
> names. "wsdl2java" and "java2wsdl" seem to make more sense to me, but
> it probably doesn't really matter.
>
>
> In anycase, if someone wanted to take this on and maybe use this as a
> starting point, I'm OK with that.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Tuesday 03 July 2007 11:18, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be nice if we had some pre-bundled ant tasks for people
> > instead of a macro thingy (IIRC) which they cut and paste? Or am I
> > missing out on some huge advantage of what we currently have?
> >
> > On 7/3/07, Glynn, Eoghan <eo...@iona.com> wrote:
> > > See distribution/src/main/release/samples/common_build.xml
> > >
> > > /Eoghan
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Guy Pardon [mailto:guy.pardon@atomikos.com]
> > > > Sent: 03 July 2007 13:07
> > > > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > > Subject: wsdl2java ant task
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > is there a wsdl2java ant task around?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Guy
> > >
> > > ----------------------------
> > > IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
> > > Registered Number: 171387
> > > Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4,
> > > Ireland
>
Re: wsdl2java ant task
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
I've attached the source of the anttasks we use for the wiring into the
TCK. It could definitely be used as a starting point for something
more complete. It basically just "mimics" the RI ant tasks so all the
docs for those should apply (within the limits of CXFs tools).
The main thing I don't really like about it are:
1) The RI has a bunch of flags that don't make sense for our tools.
Thus, the antasks have a bunch of fields and stuff that just don't do
anything.
2) I really am not a fan of "wsimport" and "wsgen" as the
names. "wsdl2java" and "java2wsdl" seem to make more sense to me, but
it probably doesn't really matter.
In anycase, if someone wanted to take this on and maybe use this as a
starting point, I'm OK with that.
Dan
On Tuesday 03 July 2007 11:18, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> Wouldn't it be nice if we had some pre-bundled ant tasks for people
> instead of a macro thingy (IIRC) which they cut and paste? Or am I
> missing out on some huge advantage of what we currently have?
>
> On 7/3/07, Glynn, Eoghan <eo...@iona.com> wrote:
> > See distribution/src/main/release/samples/common_build.xml
> >
> > /Eoghan
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Guy Pardon [mailto:guy.pardon@atomikos.com]
> > > Sent: 03 July 2007 13:07
> > > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: wsdl2java ant task
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > is there a wsdl2java ant task around?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Guy
> >
> > ----------------------------
> > IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
> > Registered Number: 171387
> > Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4,
> > Ireland
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
http://www.dankulp.com/blog