You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@forrest.apache.org by Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org> on 2005/07/06 08:22:44 UTC
Re: SVN comments for merges (Was: svn commit: r209312 - in
/forrest/trunk/whiteboard/plugins)
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 14:55 +1000, David Crossley wrote:
> In future please use a better commit messages for merges.
please give an example for a better one.
> I made the same mistake when i did a merge recently.
> The svnbook.red-bean.com recommends to use exact numbers
> rather than the symbol "head".
>
you mean I should predict the revision number > New Revision: 209312?
salu2
> -David
>
> > Author: thorsten
> > Date: Tue Jul 5 13:17:18 2005
> > New Revision: 209312
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=209312&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Merged views from locationmap_branch back to trunk -r190293:head
> >
> [ snip ]
--
thorsten
"Together we stand, divided we fall!"
Hey you (Pink Floyd)
Re: SVN comments for merges (Was: svn commit: r209312 - in /forrest/trunk/whiteboard/plugins)
Posted by David Crossley <cr...@apache.org>.
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > In future please use a better commit messages for merges.
>
> please give an example for a better one.
See svnbook. I meant the revision number ...
> > I made the same mistake when i did a merge recently.
> > The svnbook.red-bean.com recommends to use exact numbers
> > rather than the symbol "head".
>
> you mean I should predict the revision number > New Revision: 209312?
Good point. Cannot be predicted. Forget that, the revision
number can be found inside the commit message.
Sorry for the noise.
-David
> salu2
>
> > -David
> >
> > > Author: thorsten
> > > Date: Tue Jul 5 13:17:18 2005
> > > New Revision: 209312
> > >
> > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=209312&view=rev
> > > Log:
> > > Merged views from locationmap_branch back to trunk -r190293:head
> > >
> > [ snip ]
> --
> thorsten
>
> "Together we stand, divided we fall!"
> Hey you (Pink Floyd)