You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Otis Gospodnetic (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/03/23 20:19:50 UTC

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1561) Maybe rename Field.omitTf, and strengthen the javadocs

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12688385#action_12688385 ] 

Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-1561:
------------------------------------------

Might be good to keep a consistent name across Lucene/Solr.
More info coming up in SOLR-1079.


> Maybe rename Field.omitTf, and strengthen the javadocs
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1561
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1561
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.1
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1561.patch
>
>
> Spinoff from here:
>   http://www.nabble.com/search-problem-when-indexed-using-Field.setOmitTf()-td22456141.html
> Maybe rename omitTf to something like omitTermPositions, and make it clear what queries will silently fail to work as a result.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org