You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by Kalle Korhonen <ka...@gmail.com> on 2011/03/03 20:24:39 UTC

Add TAP5 to sonar?

I just noticed there's a Sonar instance running at
http://analysis.apache.org/. Could we get Tapestry on it? I'd ask for
permissions myself but I'm pretty sure access is restricted to PMC
members.

Kalle

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org

Re: Add TAP5 to sonar?

Posted by Ulrich Stärk <ul...@spielviel.de>.
We need Xvfb and Firefox in order to run the integration tests. And still, I don't think that this
will increase our code coverage ratio. In order to correctly measure that, the test coverage tool
needs to do dynamic analysis for finding out what gets tested and I doubt that it does that.

Uli

On 03.03.2011 22:43, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
> First report available:
> http://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/48022 - mirrors the results
> that Andreas linked to (selenium tests fail).
> 
> Kalle
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Kalle Korhonen
> <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> No, not sure. I doubt the Selenium tests run regardless of Maven
>> version. Yes, site and reports configuration would need to be changed
>> for 3.x but that's separate. Figured I'll open the case first, see how
>> far we get and meanwhile try it out locally.
>>
>> Kalle
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Ulrich Stärk <ul...@spielviel.de> wrote:
>>> You sure that Maven 3.0.2 will run the tests correctly? Last time I tried I had problems generating
>>> the site and running the component report with 3.0.2 but that might be a completely different beast.
>>>
>>> Uli
>>>
>>> On 03.03.2011 21:57, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
>>>> Yeah, claiming any absolute number is tricky. It depends on how and
>>>> what you are looking at, but for the core alone, these coverage levels
>>>> (see http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5.2-dev/tapestry-core/cobertura/index.html)
>>>> are among the best I've ever seen in any project of similar size.
>>>> Opened INFRA issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3487
>>>>
>>>> Kalle
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Andreas Andreou <an...@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
>>>>> i remember seeing tapestry stats too somewhere...
>>>>> yep, here they are (for 5.3.0-SNAPSHOT):
>>>>> http://nemo.sonarsource.org/dashboard/index/14
>>>>>
>>>>> It reports a code coverage of 45,0% but that's probably because
>>>>> it can't run the browser based tests (also explains the 758 skipped tests)
>>>>>
>>>>> In the design menu, you'll see lot's of dependency cycles (in the package level)
>>>>> but overal the rules compliance (whatever that means) seems very good
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 22:23, Igor Drobiazko <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> It's amazing. The most Apache projects have a coverage under 50%.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Kalle Korhonen
>>>>>> <ka...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just noticed there's a Sonar instance running at
>>>>>>> http://analysis.apache.org/. Could we get Tapestry on it? I'd ask for
>>>>>>> permissions myself but I'm pretty sure access is restricted to PMC
>>>>>>> members.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kalle
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Igor Drobiazko
>>>>>> http://tapestry5.de
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://blog.andyhot.gr
>>>>> Apache Tapestry PMC / http://chesstu.be owner
>>>>> Open Source / JEE Consulting
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org

Re: Add TAP5 to sonar?

Posted by Kalle Korhonen <ka...@gmail.com>.
First report available:
http://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/48022 - mirrors the results
that Andreas linked to (selenium tests fail).

Kalle


On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Kalle Korhonen
<ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, not sure. I doubt the Selenium tests run regardless of Maven
> version. Yes, site and reports configuration would need to be changed
> for 3.x but that's separate. Figured I'll open the case first, see how
> far we get and meanwhile try it out locally.
>
> Kalle
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Ulrich Stärk <ul...@spielviel.de> wrote:
>> You sure that Maven 3.0.2 will run the tests correctly? Last time I tried I had problems generating
>> the site and running the component report with 3.0.2 but that might be a completely different beast.
>>
>> Uli
>>
>> On 03.03.2011 21:57, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
>>> Yeah, claiming any absolute number is tricky. It depends on how and
>>> what you are looking at, but for the core alone, these coverage levels
>>> (see http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5.2-dev/tapestry-core/cobertura/index.html)
>>> are among the best I've ever seen in any project of similar size.
>>> Opened INFRA issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3487
>>>
>>> Kalle
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Andreas Andreou <an...@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
>>>> i remember seeing tapestry stats too somewhere...
>>>> yep, here they are (for 5.3.0-SNAPSHOT):
>>>> http://nemo.sonarsource.org/dashboard/index/14
>>>>
>>>> It reports a code coverage of 45,0% but that's probably because
>>>> it can't run the browser based tests (also explains the 758 skipped tests)
>>>>
>>>> In the design menu, you'll see lot's of dependency cycles (in the package level)
>>>> but overal the rules compliance (whatever that means) seems very good
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 22:23, Igor Drobiazko <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> It's amazing. The most Apache projects have a coverage under 50%.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Kalle Korhonen
>>>>> <ka...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I just noticed there's a Sonar instance running at
>>>>>> http://analysis.apache.org/. Could we get Tapestry on it? I'd ask for
>>>>>> permissions myself but I'm pretty sure access is restricted to PMC
>>>>>> members.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kalle
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Igor Drobiazko
>>>>> http://tapestry5.de
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://blog.andyhot.gr
>>>> Apache Tapestry PMC / http://chesstu.be owner
>>>> Open Source / JEE Consulting
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org

Re: Add TAP5 to sonar?

Posted by Kalle Korhonen <ka...@gmail.com>.
No, not sure. I doubt the Selenium tests run regardless of Maven
version. Yes, site and reports configuration would need to be changed
for 3.x but that's separate. Figured I'll open the case first, see how
far we get and meanwhile try it out locally.

Kalle


On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Ulrich Stärk <ul...@spielviel.de> wrote:
> You sure that Maven 3.0.2 will run the tests correctly? Last time I tried I had problems generating
> the site and running the component report with 3.0.2 but that might be a completely different beast.
>
> Uli
>
> On 03.03.2011 21:57, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
>> Yeah, claiming any absolute number is tricky. It depends on how and
>> what you are looking at, but for the core alone, these coverage levels
>> (see http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5.2-dev/tapestry-core/cobertura/index.html)
>> are among the best I've ever seen in any project of similar size.
>> Opened INFRA issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3487
>>
>> Kalle
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Andreas Andreou <an...@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
>>> i remember seeing tapestry stats too somewhere...
>>> yep, here they are (for 5.3.0-SNAPSHOT):
>>> http://nemo.sonarsource.org/dashboard/index/14
>>>
>>> It reports a code coverage of 45,0% but that's probably because
>>> it can't run the browser based tests (also explains the 758 skipped tests)
>>>
>>> In the design menu, you'll see lot's of dependency cycles (in the package level)
>>> but overal the rules compliance (whatever that means) seems very good
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 22:23, Igor Drobiazko <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> It's amazing. The most Apache projects have a coverage under 50%.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Kalle Korhonen
>>>> <ka...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I just noticed there's a Sonar instance running at
>>>>> http://analysis.apache.org/. Could we get Tapestry on it? I'd ask for
>>>>> permissions myself but I'm pretty sure access is restricted to PMC
>>>>> members.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kalle
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Igor Drobiazko
>>>> http://tapestry5.de
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://blog.andyhot.gr
>>> Apache Tapestry PMC / http://chesstu.be owner
>>> Open Source / JEE Consulting
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org

Re: Add TAP5 to sonar?

Posted by Ulrich Stärk <ul...@spielviel.de>.
You sure that Maven 3.0.2 will run the tests correctly? Last time I tried I had problems generating
the site and running the component report with 3.0.2 but that might be a completely different beast.

Uli

On 03.03.2011 21:57, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
> Yeah, claiming any absolute number is tricky. It depends on how and
> what you are looking at, but for the core alone, these coverage levels
> (see http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5.2-dev/tapestry-core/cobertura/index.html)
> are among the best I've ever seen in any project of similar size.
> Opened INFRA issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3487
> 
> Kalle
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Andreas Andreou <an...@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
>> i remember seeing tapestry stats too somewhere...
>> yep, here they are (for 5.3.0-SNAPSHOT):
>> http://nemo.sonarsource.org/dashboard/index/14
>>
>> It reports a code coverage of 45,0% but that's probably because
>> it can't run the browser based tests (also explains the 758 skipped tests)
>>
>> In the design menu, you'll see lot's of dependency cycles (in the package level)
>> but overal the rules compliance (whatever that means) seems very good
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 22:23, Igor Drobiazko <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It's amazing. The most Apache projects have a coverage under 50%.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Kalle Korhonen
>>> <ka...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just noticed there's a Sonar instance running at
>>>> http://analysis.apache.org/. Could we get Tapestry on it? I'd ask for
>>>> permissions myself but I'm pretty sure access is restricted to PMC
>>>> members.
>>>>
>>>> Kalle
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Igor Drobiazko
>>> http://tapestry5.de
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://blog.andyhot.gr
>> Apache Tapestry PMC / http://chesstu.be owner
>> Open Source / JEE Consulting
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org

Re: Add TAP5 to sonar?

Posted by Kalle Korhonen <ka...@gmail.com>.
Yeah, claiming any absolute number is tricky. It depends on how and
what you are looking at, but for the core alone, these coverage levels
(see http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5.2-dev/tapestry-core/cobertura/index.html)
are among the best I've ever seen in any project of similar size.
Opened INFRA issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3487

Kalle


On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Andreas Andreou <an...@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
> i remember seeing tapestry stats too somewhere...
> yep, here they are (for 5.3.0-SNAPSHOT):
> http://nemo.sonarsource.org/dashboard/index/14
>
> It reports a code coverage of 45,0% but that's probably because
> it can't run the browser based tests (also explains the 758 skipped tests)
>
> In the design menu, you'll see lot's of dependency cycles (in the package level)
> but overal the rules compliance (whatever that means) seems very good
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 22:23, Igor Drobiazko <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's amazing. The most Apache projects have a coverage under 50%.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Kalle Korhonen
>> <ka...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I just noticed there's a Sonar instance running at
>>> http://analysis.apache.org/. Could we get Tapestry on it? I'd ask for
>>> permissions myself but I'm pretty sure access is restricted to PMC
>>> members.
>>>
>>> Kalle
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Igor Drobiazko
>> http://tapestry5.de
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://blog.andyhot.gr
> Apache Tapestry PMC / http://chesstu.be owner
> Open Source / JEE Consulting
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org

Re: Add TAP5 to sonar?

Posted by Andreas Andreou <an...@di.uoa.gr>.
i remember seeing tapestry stats too somewhere...
yep, here they are (for 5.3.0-SNAPSHOT):
http://nemo.sonarsource.org/dashboard/index/14

It reports a code coverage of 45,0% but that's probably because
it can't run the browser based tests (also explains the 758 skipped tests)

In the design menu, you'll see lot's of dependency cycles (in the package level)
but overal the rules compliance (whatever that means) seems very good

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 22:23, Igor Drobiazko <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's amazing. The most Apache projects have a coverage under 50%.
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Kalle Korhonen
> <ka...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I just noticed there's a Sonar instance running at
>> http://analysis.apache.org/. Could we get Tapestry on it? I'd ask for
>> permissions myself but I'm pretty sure access is restricted to PMC
>> members.
>>
>> Kalle
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Igor Drobiazko
> http://tapestry5.de
>



-- 
Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://blog.andyhot.gr
Apache Tapestry PMC / http://chesstu.be owner
Open Source / JEE Consulting

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org

Re: Add TAP5 to sonar?

Posted by Igor Drobiazko <ig...@gmail.com>.
It's amazing. The most Apache projects have a coverage under 50%.

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Kalle Korhonen
<ka...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I just noticed there's a Sonar instance running at
> http://analysis.apache.org/. Could we get Tapestry on it? I'd ask for
> permissions myself but I'm pretty sure access is restricted to PMC
> members.
>
> Kalle
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Best regards,

Igor Drobiazko
http://tapestry5.de

Re: Add TAP5 to sonar?

Posted by Kalle Korhonen <ka...@gmail.com>.
Makes sense. I'll apply for Shiro at the same time (I'm PMC there so
perhaps I'll get a pass).

And to Igor: I think below 50% is unfortunately pretty typical in the
real world, open source or proprietary - what's amazing is that
Tapestry's line coverage is consistently over 90%. Reaching that level
gets much, much harder the bigger and the more complex a project is,
and Tapestry is neither a small nor simple project by any means.

Kalle


On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Ulrich Stärk <ul...@spielviel.de> wrote:
> I'd say go for it. If it needs formal PMC confirmation, we can run a vote and delegate the task to you.
>
> Uli
>
> On 03.03.2011 20:36, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
>> It's a code quality analysis tool, see http://www.sonarsource.org/. A
>> bit higher level than raw cobertura etc. reports. I think it could
>> very well highlight how high quality Tapestry code is.
>>
>> Kalle
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I haven't used Sonar ... what does it do?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Kalle Korhonen
>>> <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I just noticed there's a Sonar instance running at
>>>> http://analysis.apache.org/. Could we get Tapestry on it? I'd ask for
>>>> permissions myself but I'm pretty sure access is restricted to PMC
>>>> members.
>>>>
>>>> Kalle
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Howard M. Lewis Ship
>>>
>>> Creator of Apache Tapestry
>>>
>>> The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
>>> learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
>>>
>>> (971) 678-5210
>>> http://howardlewisship.com
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org

Re: Add TAP5 to sonar?

Posted by Ulrich Stärk <ul...@spielviel.de>.
I'd say go for it. If it needs formal PMC confirmation, we can run a vote and delegate the task to you.

Uli

On 03.03.2011 20:36, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
> It's a code quality analysis tool, see http://www.sonarsource.org/. A
> bit higher level than raw cobertura etc. reports. I think it could
> very well highlight how high quality Tapestry code is.
> 
> Kalle
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I haven't used Sonar ... what does it do?
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Kalle Korhonen
>> <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I just noticed there's a Sonar instance running at
>>> http://analysis.apache.org/. Could we get Tapestry on it? I'd ask for
>>> permissions myself but I'm pretty sure access is restricted to PMC
>>> members.
>>>
>>> Kalle
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Howard M. Lewis Ship
>>
>> Creator of Apache Tapestry
>>
>> The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
>> learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
>>
>> (971) 678-5210
>> http://howardlewisship.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org

Re: Add TAP5 to sonar?

Posted by Kalle Korhonen <ka...@gmail.com>.
It's a code quality analysis tool, see http://www.sonarsource.org/. A
bit higher level than raw cobertura etc. reports. I think it could
very well highlight how high quality Tapestry code is.

Kalle


On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I haven't used Sonar ... what does it do?
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Kalle Korhonen
> <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I just noticed there's a Sonar instance running at
>> http://analysis.apache.org/. Could we get Tapestry on it? I'd ask for
>> permissions myself but I'm pretty sure access is restricted to PMC
>> members.
>>
>> Kalle
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
>
> Creator of Apache Tapestry
>
> The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
> learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
>
> (971) 678-5210
> http://howardlewisship.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org

Re: Add TAP5 to sonar?

Posted by Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com>.
I haven't used Sonar ... what does it do?

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Kalle Korhonen
<ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just noticed there's a Sonar instance running at
> http://analysis.apache.org/. Could we get Tapestry on it? I'd ask for
> permissions myself but I'm pretty sure access is restricted to PMC
> members.
>
> Kalle
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>



-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship

Creator of Apache Tapestry

The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!

(971) 678-5210
http://howardlewisship.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org