Where to host schema files?

[Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>]

Hey everyone,

The PortletBridge project has a schema that we need to make available 
for some of the faces-config extensions outlined in the most recent 
spec.  I was wondering if making these available on the portlet bridge's 
website was sufficient or whether we needed to put it somewhere else.  
It has the potential to generate a lot of traffic as validations of the 
schema may need to access this file on the website.

Scott

Re: Where to host schema files?

[Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>]

Not sure.  I was looking for the JSF one and I know it's online but I 
couldn't find it in the JAR anywhere.  Let me look again.

Scott

Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> hrm...
> not sure, but isn't the schema not part of the jar?
>
> On Nov 29, 2007 8:41 PM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> The PortletBridge project has a schema that we need to make available
>> for some of the faces-config extensions outlined in the most recent
>> spec.  I was wondering if making these available on the portlet bridge's
>> website was sufficient or whether we needed to put it somewhere else.
>> It has the potential to generate a lot of traffic as validations of the
>> schema may need to access this file on the website.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   

Re: Where to host schema files?

[Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>]

That's not up to me unfortunately though.  :)  I'm going to try to 
figure out how it's packaged in Faces but it doesn't change the fact 
that we'll still need it online.  The XML Spec for a schema definition 
is a URI and all schema's follow suit.  Indeed if I can package the 
schema and short-circuit the uri to it then traffic won't be an issue.  
I'll still need a place, however to put it up.  But I guess I can put 
that on the portlet-bridge website.  I'll keep you all posted.

Scott

simon wrote:
> There must be a way for the portlet bridge to bundle the schema it needs
> inside its jar, and "register" it with JSF so that the local copy is
> used and not one downloaded from the network.
>
> A library that requires over-the-internet access to its schema in order
> to run would be horribly wrong.
>
> On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 23:35 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>   
>> hrm...
>> not sure, but isn't the schema not part of the jar?
>>
>> On Nov 29, 2007 8:41 PM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> Hey everyone,
>>>
>>> The PortletBridge project has a schema that we need to make available
>>> for some of the faces-config extensions outlined in the most recent
>>> spec.  I was wondering if making these available on the portlet bridge's
>>> website was sufficient or whether we needed to put it somewhere else.
>>> It has the potential to generate a lot of traffic as validations of the
>>> schema may need to access this file on the website.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>       
>>
>>     
>
>
>   

Re: Where to host schema files?

[simon <si...@chello.at>]

There must be a way for the portlet bridge to bundle the schema it needs
inside its jar, and "register" it with JSF so that the local copy is
used and not one downloaded from the network.

A library that requires over-the-internet access to its schema in order
to run would be horribly wrong.

On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 23:35 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> hrm...
> not sure, but isn't the schema not part of the jar?
> 
> On Nov 29, 2007 8:41 PM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > The PortletBridge project has a schema that we need to make available
> > for some of the faces-config extensions outlined in the most recent
> > spec.  I was wondering if making these available on the portlet bridge's
> > website was sufficient or whether we needed to put it somewhere else.
> > It has the potential to generate a lot of traffic as validations of the
> > schema may need to access this file on the website.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> 
> 
> 

Re: Where to host schema files?

[Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>]

hrm...
not sure, but isn't the schema not part of the jar?

On Nov 29, 2007 8:41 PM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> The PortletBridge project has a schema that we need to make available
> for some of the faces-config extensions outlined in the most recent
> spec.  I was wondering if making these available on the portlet bridge's
> website was sufficient or whether we needed to put it somewhere else.
> It has the potential to generate a lot of traffic as validations of the
> schema may need to access this file on the website.
>
> Scott
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org