You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by polloxx <po...@gmail.com> on 2008/05/26 14:48:16 UTC
Spam not tagged
Dear list,
Last week we've got some spam, bounced messages (a so called joe-job)
not tagged as spam in the subject. "Regular" spam messages are tagged
in the subject. In the headers I see that spamassassin gave the
message a score of above 24:
May 23 19:36:29 server2 amavis[16930]: (16930-08) SPAM-TAG, <> ->
<ad...@company.com>, Yes, score=24.347 tagged_abo
ve=3 required=7 tests=[DCC_CHECK=1.37, DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001,
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.808, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_SHO
RT_LINK_IMG_3=0.556, PYZOR_CHECK=2.834, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E
8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, SARE_UNI=0.591, URIBL_AB_SURBL=1.613,
URIBL_BLACK=1.961, URIBL_JP_SURBL=2.857, URIBL
_OB_SURBL=2.132, URIBL_SC_SURBL=2.523, URIBL_WS_SURBL=2.1]
But why did SA not add *** SPAM *** to the subject?
I'm using:
spamassassin 3.2.3-0.volatile1
amavisd-new 2.4.2-6.1
Re: Spam not tagged
Posted by Sahil Tandon <sa...@tandon.net>.
polloxx <po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> But why did SA not add *** SPAM *** to the subject?
> >
> > Because you are using amavisd.
>
> Can you explain your opinion a bit more?
> What would you suggest as an alternative?
No need for an alternative; invoking SA via amavisd is perfectly fine. Just
read:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/#faq-spam
and take the rest of this read to the amavisd mailing list if you have more
questions.
--
Sahil Tandon <sa...@tandon.net>
Re: Spam not tagged
Posted by SM <sm...@resistor.net>.
At 12:48 26-05-2008, polloxx wrote:
>Can you explain your opinion a bit more?
>What would you suggest as an alternative?
I'm not suggesting an alternative. You are not interacting directly
with SpamAssassin. You are using Amavisd which invokes SpamAssassin
modules, then perform rewrites, rejection, etc. based on the
results. In the example you gave, the Subject header should have
been tagged. As it wasn't, you can refer to the Amavisd
documentation to determine whether you have put in the required directives.
The following URL lists software which integrate SpamAssassin:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedSolutions
If SpamAssassin is not working correctly with these software, the
better place is ask for help is on their respective mailing list.
Regards,
-sm
Re: Spam not tagged
Posted by Rick Macdougall <ri...@ummm-beer.com>.
polloxx wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 7:39 PM, SM <sm...@resistor.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> But why did SA not add *** SPAM *** to the subject?
>> Because you are using amavisd.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -sm
>>
>
> Can you explain your opinion a bit more?
> What would you suggest as an alternative?
>
> Thank you,
> P.
You are running Amavis which calls the perl part of spamassassin itself.
You are not running spamd, which is the program that adds the
***SPAM*** to the subject.
You will want to try the amavis mailing list for more information.
Regards,
Rick
Re: Spam not tagged
Posted by polloxx <po...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 7:39 PM, SM <sm...@resistor.net> wrote:
> At 05:48 26-05-2008, polloxx wrote:
>>
>> Last week we've got some spam, bounced messages (a so called joe-job)
>> not tagged as spam in the subject. "Regular" spam messages are tagged
>> in the subject. In the headers I see that spamassassin gave the
>> message a score of above 24:
>>
>> May 23 19:36:29 server2 amavis[16930]: (16930-08) SPAM-TAG, <> ->
>> <ad...@company.com>, Yes, score=24.347 tagged_abo
>> ve=3 required=7 tests=[DCC_CHECK=1.37, DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001,
>> HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.808, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_SHO
>> RT_LINK_IMG_3=0.556, PYZOR_CHECK=2.834, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5,
>> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E
>> 8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, SARE_UNI=0.591, URIBL_AB_SURBL=1.613,
>> URIBL_BLACK=1.961, URIBL_JP_SURBL=2.857, URIBL
>> _OB_SURBL=2.132, URIBL_SC_SURBL=2.523, URIBL_WS_SURBL=2.1]
>>
>> But why did SA not add *** SPAM *** to the subject?
>
> Because you are using amavisd.
>
> Regards,
> -sm
>
Can you explain your opinion a bit more?
What would you suggest as an alternative?
Thank you,
P.
Re: Spam not tagged
Posted by SM <sm...@resistor.net>.
At 05:48 26-05-2008, polloxx wrote:
>Last week we've got some spam, bounced messages (a so called joe-job)
>not tagged as spam in the subject. "Regular" spam messages are tagged
>in the subject. In the headers I see that spamassassin gave the
>message a score of above 24:
>
>May 23 19:36:29 server2 amavis[16930]: (16930-08) SPAM-TAG, <> ->
><ad...@company.com>, Yes, score=24.347 tagged_abo
>ve=3 required=7 tests=[DCC_CHECK=1.37, DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001,
>HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.808, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_SHO
>RT_LINK_IMG_3=0.556, PYZOR_CHECK=2.834, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5,
>RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E
>8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, SARE_UNI=0.591, URIBL_AB_SURBL=1.613,
>URIBL_BLACK=1.961, URIBL_JP_SURBL=2.857, URIBL
>_OB_SURBL=2.132, URIBL_SC_SURBL=2.523, URIBL_WS_SURBL=2.1]
>
>But why did SA not add *** SPAM *** to the subject?
Because you are using amavisd.
Regards,
-sm
Re: Spam not tagged
Posted by mouss <mo...@netoyen.net>.
polloxx wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Last week we've got some spam, bounced messages (a so called joe-job)
> not tagged as spam in the subject. "Regular" spam messages are tagged
> in the subject. In the headers I see that spamassassin gave the
> message a score of above 24:
>
> May 23 19:36:29 server2 amavis[16930]: (16930-08) SPAM-TAG, <> ->
> <ad...@company.com>, Yes, score=24.347 tagged_abo
> ve=3 required=7 tests=[DCC_CHECK=1.37, DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001,
> HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.808, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_SHO
> RT_LINK_IMG_3=0.556, PYZOR_CHECK=2.834, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5,
> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E
> 8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, SARE_UNI=0.591, URIBL_AB_SURBL=1.613,
> URIBL_BLACK=1.961, URIBL_JP_SURBL=2.857, URIBL
> _OB_SURBL=2.132, URIBL_SC_SURBL=2.523, URIBL_WS_SURBL=2.1]
>
> But why did SA not add *** SPAM *** to the subject?
>
This is an amavisd-new FAQ. amavisd-new only tags the subject for mail
that is directed to local domains.