You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Stanislav Kozlovski <st...@confluent.io> on 2018/07/25 17:03:59 UTC
[VOTE] KIP-342 - Add support for custom SASL extensions in
OAuthBearer authentication
Hey everbody,
I'd like to start a vote thread for KIP-342 Add support for custom SASL
extensions in OAuthBearer authentication
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-342%3A+Add+support+for+Custom+SASL+extensions+in+OAuthBearer+authentication>
--
Best,
Stanislav
Re: [VOTE] KIP-342 - Add support for custom SASL extensions in
OAuthBearer authentication
Posted by Stanislav Kozlovski <st...@confluent.io>.
KIP-342 has passed.
Here is the vote break down:
Binding:
- Jason Gustafson
- Jun Rao
- Rajini Sivaram
Non-Binding:
- Ron Dagostino
Thanks to all of those who voted and provided feedback!
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 11:50 PM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote:
> +1 Thanks Stanislav!
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Stanislav Kozlovski <
> stanislav@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you, Jun. Noted in the KIP.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:28 AM Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Stanislav,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> > >
> > > Just one minor comment. Since the JWT token supports customizable claim
> > > fields, it would be useful to clarify when to use the SASL extension vs
> > the
> > > customized fields in JWT.
> > >
> > > Jun
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Stanislav Kozlovski <
> > > stanislav@confluent.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey everbody,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to start a vote thread for KIP-342 Add support for custom
> SASL
> > > > extensions in OAuthBearer authentication
> > > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > 342%3A+Add+support+for+Custom+SASL+extensions+in+
> > > > OAuthBearer+authentication>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best,
> > > > Stanislav
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best,
> > Stanislav
> >
>
--
Best,
Stanislav
Re: [VOTE] KIP-342 - Add support for custom SASL extensions in
OAuthBearer authentication
Posted by Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io>.
+1 Thanks Stanislav!
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Stanislav Kozlovski <st...@confluent.io>
wrote:
> Thank you, Jun. Noted in the KIP.
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:28 AM Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Stanislav,
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> >
> > Just one minor comment. Since the JWT token supports customizable claim
> > fields, it would be useful to clarify when to use the SASL extension vs
> the
> > customized fields in JWT.
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Stanislav Kozlovski <
> > stanislav@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey everbody,
> > >
> > > I'd like to start a vote thread for KIP-342 Add support for custom SASL
> > > extensions in OAuthBearer authentication
> > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > 342%3A+Add+support+for+Custom+SASL+extensions+in+
> > > OAuthBearer+authentication>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best,
> > > Stanislav
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best,
> Stanislav
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-342 - Add support for custom SASL extensions in
OAuthBearer authentication
Posted by Stanislav Kozlovski <st...@confluent.io>.
Thank you, Jun. Noted in the KIP.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:28 AM Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> Hi, Stanislav,
>
> Thanks for the KIP. +1
>
> Just one minor comment. Since the JWT token supports customizable claim
> fields, it would be useful to clarify when to use the SASL extension vs the
> customized fields in JWT.
>
> Jun
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Stanislav Kozlovski <
> stanislav@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Hey everbody,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote thread for KIP-342 Add support for custom SASL
> > extensions in OAuthBearer authentication
> > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > 342%3A+Add+support+for+Custom+SASL+extensions+in+
> > OAuthBearer+authentication>
> >
> > --
> > Best,
> > Stanislav
> >
>
--
Best,
Stanislav
Re: [VOTE] KIP-342 - Add support for custom SASL extensions in
OAuthBearer authentication
Posted by Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io>.
Hi, Stanislav,
Thanks for the KIP. +1
Just one minor comment. Since the JWT token supports customizable claim
fields, it would be useful to clarify when to use the SASL extension vs the
customized fields in JWT.
Jun
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Stanislav Kozlovski <
stanislav@confluent.io> wrote:
> Hey everbody,
>
> I'd like to start a vote thread for KIP-342 Add support for custom SASL
> extensions in OAuthBearer authentication
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 342%3A+Add+support+for+Custom+SASL+extensions+in+
> OAuthBearer+authentication>
>
> --
> Best,
> Stanislav
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-342 - Add support for custom SASL extensions in
OAuthBearer authentication
Posted by Rajini Sivaram <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi Stanislav,
Thanks for the KIP.
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Rajini
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Ron Dagostino <rn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (Non-binding). Thanks for the KIP and the PR, Stanislav.
>
> Ron
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 1:04 PM Stanislav Kozlovski <
> stanislav@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey everbody,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote thread for KIP-342 Add support for custom SASL
> > extensions in OAuthBearer authentication
> > <
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 342%3A+Add+support+for+Custom+SASL+extensions+in+
> OAuthBearer+authentication
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Best,
> > Stanislav
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-342 - Add support for custom SASL extensions in
OAuthBearer authentication
Posted by Ron Dagostino <rn...@gmail.com>.
+1 (Non-binding). Thanks for the KIP and the PR, Stanislav.
Ron
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 1:04 PM Stanislav Kozlovski <st...@confluent.io>
wrote:
> Hey everbody,
>
> I'd like to start a vote thread for KIP-342 Add support for custom SASL
> extensions in OAuthBearer authentication
> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-342%3A+Add+support+for+Custom+SASL+extensions+in+OAuthBearer+authentication
> >
>
> --
> Best,
> Stanislav
>