You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de> on 2007/02/16 11:27:20 UTC
RAT reports
I have created RAT reports for the source and binary distributions. For
each, there is the full, unedited report, as well as a shortened and
commented one. I plan to make these available when I call for the
incubator vote. Please check them out and let me know if you find any
issues.
http://people.apache.org/~twgoetz/uima-2.1.0/RAT/
--Thilo
Re: RAT reports
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Marshall Schor wrote:
>> Thilo Goetz wrote:
>>> Adam Lally wrote:
>>>> On 2/16/07, Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>>> I have created RAT reports for the source and binary
>>>>> distributions. For
>>>>> each, there is the full, unedited report, as well as a shortened and
>>>>> commented one. I plan to make these available when I call for the
>>>>> incubator vote. Please check them out and let me know if you find
>>>>> any
>>>>> issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~twgoetz/uima-2.1.0/RAT/
>>>>>
>>
>> The text sample files which carry no license info: Do we need to say
>> somewhere else (perhaps in the NOTICES file) that the following text
>> data files are licensed under <insert name of license>? The ones
>> from IBM we donated as part of the software grant, so we licensed
>> these to ASF under the same license we licensed all the other sources.
>> -Marshall
>
> I guess the only one that is not ours to give away is "Moby Dick", and
> that's in the public domain and so doesn't need special mention, I
> think. Let's see what the Incubator PMC has to say. Do we have other
> text files that are not of IBM origin and thus covered by the software
> grant?
I'm not aware of any, at this point.
-Marshall
Re: RAT reports
Posted by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>.
Marshall Schor wrote:
> Thilo Goetz wrote:
>> Adam Lally wrote:
>>> On 2/16/07, Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>> I have created RAT reports for the source and binary distributions.
>>>> For
>>>> each, there is the full, unedited report, as well as a shortened and
>>>> commented one. I plan to make these available when I call for the
>>>> incubator vote. Please check them out and let me know if you find any
>>>> issues.
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~twgoetz/uima-2.1.0/RAT/
>>>>
>
> The text sample files which carry no license info: Do we need to say
> somewhere else (perhaps in the NOTICES file) that the following text
> data files are licensed under <insert name of license>? The ones from
> IBM we donated as part of the software grant, so we licensed these to
> ASF under the same license we licensed all the other sources.
> -Marshall
I guess the only one that is not ours to give away is "Moby Dick", and
that's in the public domain and so doesn't need special mention, I
think. Let's see what the Incubator PMC has to say. Do we have other
text files that are not of IBM origin and thus covered by the software
grant?
--Thilo
Re: RAT reports
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Adam Lally wrote:
>> On 2/16/07, Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>> I have created RAT reports for the source and binary distributions.
>>> For
>>> each, there is the full, unedited report, as well as a shortened and
>>> commented one. I plan to make these available when I call for the
>>> incubator vote. Please check them out and let me know if you find any
>>> issues.
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~twgoetz/uima-2.1.0/RAT/
>>>
The text sample files which carry no license info: Do we need to say
somewhere else (perhaps in the NOTICES file) that the following text
data files are licensed under <insert name of license>? The ones from
IBM we donated as part of the software grant, so we licensed these to
ASF under the same license we licensed all the other sources.
-Marshall
Re: RAT reports
Posted by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>.
Adam Lally wrote:
> On 2/16/07, Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> I have created RAT reports for the source and binary distributions. For
>> each, there is the full, unedited report, as well as a shortened and
>> commented one. I plan to make these available when I call for the
>> incubator vote. Please check them out and let me know if you find any
>> issues.
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~twgoetz/uima-2.1.0/RAT/
>>
>
> Excellent, thanks for doing this. My only comment is I didn't know
> what the word "elided" meant. ;) I do not recall ever seeing it
> before. But I looked it up, and you are using it correctly. But
> "omitted" might be in more people's vocabularies. :)
>
> -Adam
Oops, that must be my linguistics background. Linguists say that the
stuff that's missing in an eliptic construction has been elided. I
didn't know this wasn't part of regular, everyday English ;-)
--Thilo
Re: RAT reports
Posted by Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>.
On 2/16/07, Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de> wrote:
> I have created RAT reports for the source and binary distributions. For
> each, there is the full, unedited report, as well as a shortened and
> commented one. I plan to make these available when I call for the
> incubator vote. Please check them out and let me know if you find any
> issues.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~twgoetz/uima-2.1.0/RAT/
>
Excellent, thanks for doing this. My only comment is I didn't know
what the word "elided" meant. ;) I do not recall ever seeing it
before. But I looked it up, and you are using it correctly. But
"omitted" might be in more people's vocabularies. :)
-Adam