You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@oozie.apache.org by Mohammad Islam <mi...@yahoo.com> on 2014/03/31 20:23:09 UTC
Oozie 4.0.1 binary release
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the running the process!
Since we just voted for Oozie 4.0.1 source release, we can plan for the binary release in a separate process.
Although ,I believe, Apache primarily needs the source release, but most of the hadoop stack is also releasing the binary package. It will surely help the user for quicker adoption without dealing with the building process.
Btw, I was earlier advised not to combine the source and binary release at the same time for faster release.
So, if possible, you or someone else can take this binary release initiatives as soon as the source are released.
Regards,
Mohammad
Re: Oozie 4.0.1 binary release
Posted by Mona Chitnis <mo...@apache.org>.
I can take up publishing Oozie maven artifacts.
Tucu, does this require some special permissions? If yes, can you grant them to me?
Mona Chitnis
Software Engineer, Hadoop Team
Yahoo!
On Monday, March 31, 2014 5:54 PM, Robert Kanter <rk...@cloudera.com> wrote:
That would be fine, but we might want to make the whole libext thing more
clear.
I can see a lot of users, under the assumption that the binary release
would be ready to go out of the box, skipping the step of untarring the
correct hadooplib tarball into the libext dir, or choosing the wrong one.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>wrote:
> doesn't the binary contain the hadooplib TARs? If so, one single binary
> should be OK
>
> thx
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Robert Kanter <rkanter@cloudera.com
> >wrote:
>
> > That sounds like a good idea; users have been asking for binaries for a
> > long time. I suppose we'd have to make a binary release for each version
> > of Hadoop we're targeting? (i.e. Hadoop 1.1.1, Hadoop 2.3.0, Hadoop
> > 0.23.5).
> >
> > By the way, the 4.0.1 release is ready to go, I'm just waiting on the
> > mirrors to pick up the new bits. I've also updated
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOZIE/How+To+Release for git
> > and added steps for signing the release tag in git (we sign the source
> > release already, and this will ensure that we can verify that nobody
> messed
> > with where that release came from).
> >
> > I'm going to be fairly busy for a while, so I don't think I have the time
> > to figure out and do the binary releases/publish to maven. Perhaps
> someone
> > else can take this up? Also, whoever does this should create a cwiki
> page
> > to document the process.
> >
> >
> > -Robert
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu00@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > and we should get oozie jars in the maven repo
> > >
> > > thx
> > >
> > > Alejandro
> > > (phone typing)
> > >
> > > > On Mar 31, 2014, at 11:23, Mohammad Islam <mi...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Robert,
> > > > Thanks for the running the process!
> > > >
> > > > Since we just voted for Oozie 4.0.1 source release, we can plan for
> the
> > > binary release in a separate process.
> > > > Although ,I believe, Apache primarily needs the source release, but
> > > most of the hadoop stack is also releasing the binary package. It will
> > > surely help the user for quicker adoption without dealing with the
> > building
> > > process.
> > > >
> > > > Btw, I was earlier advised not to combine the source and binary
> release
> > > at the same time for faster release.
> > > >
> > > > So, if possible, you or someone else can take this binary release
> > > initiatives as soon as the source are released.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Mohammad
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Alejandro
>
Re: Oozie 4.0.1 binary release
Posted by Robert Kanter <rk...@cloudera.com>.
That would be fine, but we might want to make the whole libext thing more
clear.
I can see a lot of users, under the assumption that the binary release
would be ready to go out of the box, skipping the step of untarring the
correct hadooplib tarball into the libext dir, or choosing the wrong one.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>wrote:
> doesn't the binary contain the hadooplib TARs? If so, one single binary
> should be OK
>
> thx
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Robert Kanter <rkanter@cloudera.com
> >wrote:
>
> > That sounds like a good idea; users have been asking for binaries for a
> > long time. I suppose we'd have to make a binary release for each version
> > of Hadoop we're targeting? (i.e. Hadoop 1.1.1, Hadoop 2.3.0, Hadoop
> > 0.23.5).
> >
> > By the way, the 4.0.1 release is ready to go, I'm just waiting on the
> > mirrors to pick up the new bits. I've also updated
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOZIE/How+To+Release for git
> > and added steps for signing the release tag in git (we sign the source
> > release already, and this will ensure that we can verify that nobody
> messed
> > with where that release came from).
> >
> > I'm going to be fairly busy for a while, so I don't think I have the time
> > to figure out and do the binary releases/publish to maven. Perhaps
> someone
> > else can take this up? Also, whoever does this should create a cwiki
> page
> > to document the process.
> >
> >
> > -Robert
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu00@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > and we should get oozie jars in the maven repo
> > >
> > > thx
> > >
> > > Alejandro
> > > (phone typing)
> > >
> > > > On Mar 31, 2014, at 11:23, Mohammad Islam <mi...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Robert,
> > > > Thanks for the running the process!
> > > >
> > > > Since we just voted for Oozie 4.0.1 source release, we can plan for
> the
> > > binary release in a separate process.
> > > > Although ,I believe, Apache primarily needs the source release, but
> > > most of the hadoop stack is also releasing the binary package. It will
> > > surely help the user for quicker adoption without dealing with the
> > building
> > > process.
> > > >
> > > > Btw, I was earlier advised not to combine the source and binary
> release
> > > at the same time for faster release.
> > > >
> > > > So, if possible, you or someone else can take this binary release
> > > initiatives as soon as the source are released.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Mohammad
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Alejandro
>
Re: Oozie 4.0.1 binary release
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>.
doesn't the binary contain the hadooplib TARs? If so, one single binary
should be OK
thx
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Robert Kanter <rk...@cloudera.com>wrote:
> That sounds like a good idea; users have been asking for binaries for a
> long time. I suppose we'd have to make a binary release for each version
> of Hadoop we're targeting? (i.e. Hadoop 1.1.1, Hadoop 2.3.0, Hadoop
> 0.23.5).
>
> By the way, the 4.0.1 release is ready to go, I'm just waiting on the
> mirrors to pick up the new bits. I've also updated
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOZIE/How+To+Release for git
> and added steps for signing the release tag in git (we sign the source
> release already, and this will ensure that we can verify that nobody messed
> with where that release came from).
>
> I'm going to be fairly busy for a while, so I don't think I have the time
> to figure out and do the binary releases/publish to maven. Perhaps someone
> else can take this up? Also, whoever does this should create a cwiki page
> to document the process.
>
>
> -Robert
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu00@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > and we should get oozie jars in the maven repo
> >
> > thx
> >
> > Alejandro
> > (phone typing)
> >
> > > On Mar 31, 2014, at 11:23, Mohammad Islam <mi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Robert,
> > > Thanks for the running the process!
> > >
> > > Since we just voted for Oozie 4.0.1 source release, we can plan for the
> > binary release in a separate process.
> > > Although ,I believe, Apache primarily needs the source release, but
> > most of the hadoop stack is also releasing the binary package. It will
> > surely help the user for quicker adoption without dealing with the
> building
> > process.
> > >
> > > Btw, I was earlier advised not to combine the source and binary release
> > at the same time for faster release.
> > >
> > > So, if possible, you or someone else can take this binary release
> > initiatives as soon as the source are released.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Mohammad
> >
>
--
Alejandro
Re: Oozie 4.0.1 binary release
Posted by Robert Kanter <rk...@cloudera.com>.
That sounds like a good idea; users have been asking for binaries for a
long time. I suppose we'd have to make a binary release for each version
of Hadoop we're targeting? (i.e. Hadoop 1.1.1, Hadoop 2.3.0, Hadoop
0.23.5).
By the way, the 4.0.1 release is ready to go, I'm just waiting on the
mirrors to pick up the new bits. I've also updated
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOZIE/How+To+Release for git
and added steps for signing the release tag in git (we sign the source
release already, and this will ensure that we can verify that nobody messed
with where that release came from).
I'm going to be fairly busy for a while, so I don't think I have the time
to figure out and do the binary releases/publish to maven. Perhaps someone
else can take this up? Also, whoever does this should create a cwiki page
to document the process.
-Robert
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> and we should get oozie jars in the maven repo
>
> thx
>
> Alejandro
> (phone typing)
>
> > On Mar 31, 2014, at 11:23, Mohammad Islam <mi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Robert,
> > Thanks for the running the process!
> >
> > Since we just voted for Oozie 4.0.1 source release, we can plan for the
> binary release in a separate process.
> > Although ,I believe, Apache primarily needs the source release, but
> most of the hadoop stack is also releasing the binary package. It will
> surely help the user for quicker adoption without dealing with the building
> process.
> >
> > Btw, I was earlier advised not to combine the source and binary release
> at the same time for faster release.
> >
> > So, if possible, you or someone else can take this binary release
> initiatives as soon as the source are released.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mohammad
>
Re: Oozie 4.0.1 binary release
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@gmail.com>.
and we should get oozie jars in the maven repo
thx
Alejandro
(phone typing)
> On Mar 31, 2014, at 11:23, Mohammad Islam <mi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
> Thanks for the running the process!
>
> Since we just voted for Oozie 4.0.1 source release, we can plan for the binary release in a separate process.
> Although ,I believe, Apache primarily needs the source release, but most of the hadoop stack is also releasing the binary package. It will surely help the user for quicker adoption without dealing with the building process.
>
> Btw, I was earlier advised not to combine the source and binary release at the same time for faster release.
>
> So, if possible, you or someone else can take this binary release initiatives as soon as the source are released.
>
> Regards,
> Mohammad