You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hc.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/09/21 01:42:23 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31322] New: -
SO Timeouts should be finer grained
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31322>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31322
SO Timeouts should be finer grained
Summary: SO Timeouts should be finer grained
Product: Commons
Version: 2.1 Final
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: Enhancement
Priority: Other
Component: HttpClient
AssignedTo: commons-httpclient-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: ghexsel@uol.com.br
I'm using HttpClient in multithreaded mode, and I'm not able to set the
connection timeouts on a per-user base, it's an everyone-the-same setting for
the client.
Our project implements searching and parsing of multi-step wizards
(meta-searching other search engines), and we have a general timeout for the
whole process. Unfortunately, with HttpClient, I can't set the timeout on a
per-method (HttpMethod I mean) basis. And I can't access the socket either,
which would provide some kind of work-around. Any work-arounds you know, short
of spawning a new HttpClient for each step?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-httpclient-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org