You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Arnaud Linz (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/05/30 13:49:13 UTC

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (FLINK-3763) RabbitMQ Source/Sink standardize connection parameters

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Arnaud Linz updated FLINK-3763:
-------------------------------
    Comment: was deleted

(was: IMO, this source lacks many RMQ features in order to make it usable in production.

VirtualHost is one of them ; but shutdown timeout is also important, or else the the stream may fail after 10 minutes of inactivity => the whole RabbitMQ factory should be made available to the user. Currently it is not even accessible from an inherited class.

It would also be a good idea to make this source truly cancellable by adding something like {{consumer.getChannel().abort(AMQP.REPLY_SUCCESS, "Cancellation requested by user");}} in the {{cancel()}} method or else it may never end in a clean way.

)

> RabbitMQ Source/Sink standardize connection parameters
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-3763
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3763
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Streaming Connectors
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.1
>            Reporter: Robert Batts
>            Assignee: Subhankar Biswas
>
> The RabbitMQ source and sink should have the same capabilities in terms of establishing a connection, currently the sink is lacking connection parameters that are available on the source. Additionally, VirtualHost should be an offered parameter for multi-tenant RabbitMQ clusters (if not specified it goes to the vhost '/').
> Connection Parameters
> ===================
> - Host - Offered on both
> - Port - Source only
> - Virtual Host - Neither
> - User - Source only
> - Password - Source only
> Additionally, it might be worth offer the URI as a valid constructor because that would offer all 5 of the above parameters in a single String.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)