You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mxnet.apache.org by Carin Meier <ca...@gmail.com> on 2018/11/05 16:29:19 UTC

[VOTE] Separating PMC and Committership

This is a procedural vote on whether to separate the committer and PPMC
levels in the project. The current state is that a user is considered as
both a committer and a PPMC member at the same time. This vote is to change
that to be able to invite a person in as a committer separately from a PPMC
member.

Document reference:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member

Discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9c6ecda02e081aa6b689c92badc9dcf05ced6fb3691fd370471773d1@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E

The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule unless
otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than
unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- regardless of
the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems too
small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is typically
not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus
<https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a
modifying factor.)

The vote will run until Friday Nov 9th at 6:00 am EST

Thanks,
Carin

Re: [VOTE] Separating PMC and Committership

Posted by Chris Olivier <cj...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:36 AM Tianqi Chen <tq...@cs.washington.edu>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:29 AM Carin Meier <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is a procedural vote on whether to separate the committer and PPMC
> > levels in the project. The current state is that a user is considered as
> > both a committer and a PPMC member at the same time. This vote is to
> change
> > that to be able to invite a person in as a committer separately from a
> PPMC
> > member.
> >
> > Document reference:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member
> >
> > Discussion thread:
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9c6ecda02e081aa6b689c92badc9dcf05ced6fb3691fd370471773d1@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> >
> > The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> >
> > Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule
> unless
> > otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than
> > unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- regardless
> of
> > the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems too
> > small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is
> typically
> > not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus
> > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a
> > modifying factor.)
> >
> > The vote will run until Friday Nov 9th at 6:00 am EST
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Carin
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Separating PMC and Committership

Posted by Tianqi Chen <tq...@cs.washington.edu>.
+1

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:29 AM Carin Meier <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is a procedural vote on whether to separate the committer and PPMC
> levels in the project. The current state is that a user is considered as
> both a committer and a PPMC member at the same time. This vote is to change
> that to be able to invite a person in as a committer separately from a PPMC
> member.
>
> Document reference:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member
>
> Discussion thread:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9c6ecda02e081aa6b689c92badc9dcf05ced6fb3691fd370471773d1@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>
> The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
> Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule unless
> otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than
> unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- regardless of
> the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems too
> small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is typically
> not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus
> <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a
> modifying factor.)
>
> The vote will run until Friday Nov 9th at 6:00 am EST
>
> Thanks,
> Carin
>

Re: [VOTE] Separating PMC and Committership

Posted by Qing Lan <la...@live.com>.
+1 (non-binding)

On 11/8/18, 2:41 PM, "kellen sunderland" <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:

    +1 (non-binding)
    
    On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 10:37 AM Thomas DELTEIL <th...@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    
    > +1 (non-binding)
    >
    > Le jeu. 8 nov. 2018 à 10:04, Carin Meier <ca...@gmail.com> a écrit :
    >
    > > Reminder - Vote ends tomorrow-  Friday Nov 9th at 6:00 am EST
    > >
    > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:29 AM Carin Meier <ca...@gmail.com>
    > wrote:
    > >
    > > > This is a procedural vote on whether to separate the committer and PPMC
    > > > levels in the project. The current state is that a user is considered
    > as
    > > > both a committer and a PPMC member at the same time. This vote is to
    > > change
    > > > that to be able to invite a person in as a committer separately from a
    > > PPMC
    > > > member.
    > > >
    > > > Document reference:
    > > >
    > >
    > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member
    > > >
    > > > Discussion thread:
    > > >
    > >
    > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9c6ecda02e081aa6b689c92badc9dcf05ced6fb3691fd370471773d1@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
    > > >
    > > > The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined
    > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
    > > >
    > > > Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule
    > > unless
    > > > otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than
    > > > unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- regardless
    > > of
    > > > the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems too
    > > > small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is
    > > typically
    > > > not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus
    > > > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a
    > > > modifying factor.)
    > > >
    > > > The vote will run until Friday Nov 9th at 6:00 am EST
    > > >
    > > > Thanks,
    > > > Carin
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    >

Re: [VOTE] Separating PMC and Committership

Posted by kellen sunderland <ke...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 10:37 AM Thomas DELTEIL <th...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Le jeu. 8 nov. 2018 à 10:04, Carin Meier <ca...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > Reminder - Vote ends tomorrow-  Friday Nov 9th at 6:00 am EST
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:29 AM Carin Meier <ca...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > This is a procedural vote on whether to separate the committer and PPMC
> > > levels in the project. The current state is that a user is considered
> as
> > > both a committer and a PPMC member at the same time. This vote is to
> > change
> > > that to be able to invite a person in as a committer separately from a
> > PPMC
> > > member.
> > >
> > > Document reference:
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member
> > >
> > > Discussion thread:
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9c6ecda02e081aa6b689c92badc9dcf05ced6fb3691fd370471773d1@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > > The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined
> > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> > >
> > > Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule
> > unless
> > > otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than
> > > unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- regardless
> > of
> > > the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems too
> > > small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is
> > typically
> > > not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus
> > > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a
> > > modifying factor.)
> > >
> > > The vote will run until Friday Nov 9th at 6:00 am EST
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Carin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Separating PMC and Committership

Posted by Thomas DELTEIL <th...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)

Le jeu. 8 nov. 2018 à 10:04, Carin Meier <ca...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Reminder - Vote ends tomorrow-  Friday Nov 9th at 6:00 am EST
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:29 AM Carin Meier <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is a procedural vote on whether to separate the committer and PPMC
> > levels in the project. The current state is that a user is considered as
> > both a committer and a PPMC member at the same time. This vote is to
> change
> > that to be able to invite a person in as a committer separately from a
> PPMC
> > member.
> >
> > Document reference:
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member
> >
> > Discussion thread:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9c6ecda02e081aa6b689c92badc9dcf05ced6fb3691fd370471773d1@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> >
> > The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> >
> > Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule
> unless
> > otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than
> > unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- regardless
> of
> > the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems too
> > small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is
> typically
> > not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus
> > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a
> > modifying factor.)
> >
> > The vote will run until Friday Nov 9th at 6:00 am EST
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Carin
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Separating PMC and Committership

Posted by Carin Meier <ca...@gmail.com>.
Reminder - Vote ends tomorrow-  Friday Nov 9th at 6:00 am EST

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:29 AM Carin Meier <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is a procedural vote on whether to separate the committer and PPMC
> levels in the project. The current state is that a user is considered as
> both a committer and a PPMC member at the same time. This vote is to change
> that to be able to invite a person in as a committer separately from a PPMC
> member.
>
> Document reference:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member
>
> Discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9c6ecda02e081aa6b689c92badc9dcf05ced6fb3691fd370471773d1@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>
> The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
> Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule unless
> otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than
> unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- regardless of
> the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems too
> small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is typically
> not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus
> <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a
> modifying factor.)
>
> The vote will run until Friday Nov 9th at 6:00 am EST
>
> Thanks,
> Carin
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Separating PMC and Committership

Posted by Yuan Tang <te...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:05 PM Haibin Lin <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Carin,
>
> Thank you very much for driving this forward!
>
> +1
>
> Best,
> Haibin
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 9:54 AM Sebastian <ss...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On 05.11.18 11:29, Carin Meier wrote:
> > > This is a procedural vote on whether to separate the committer and PPMC
> > > levels in the project. The current state is that a user is considered
> as
> > > both a committer and a PPMC member at the same time. This vote is to
> > change
> > > that to be able to invite a person in as a committer separately from a
> > PPMC
> > > member.
> > >
> > > Document reference:
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member
> > >
> > > Discussion thread:
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9c6ecda02e081aa6b689c92badc9dcf05ced6fb3691fd370471773d1@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > > The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined
> > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> > >
> > > Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule
> > unless
> > > otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than
> > > unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- regardless
> > of
> > > the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems too
> > > small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is
> > typically
> > > not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus
> > > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a
> > > modifying factor.)
> > >
> > > The vote will run until Friday Nov 9th at 6:00 am EST
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Carin
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Separating PMC and Committership

Posted by Haibin Lin <ha...@gmail.com>.
Hi Carin,

Thank you very much for driving this forward!

+1

Best,
Haibin

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 9:54 AM Sebastian <ss...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On 05.11.18 11:29, Carin Meier wrote:
> > This is a procedural vote on whether to separate the committer and PPMC
> > levels in the project. The current state is that a user is considered as
> > both a committer and a PPMC member at the same time. This vote is to
> change
> > that to be able to invite a person in as a committer separately from a
> PPMC
> > member.
> >
> > Document reference:
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member
> >
> > Discussion thread:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9c6ecda02e081aa6b689c92badc9dcf05ced6fb3691fd370471773d1@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> >
> > The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> >
> > Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule
> unless
> > otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than
> > unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- regardless
> of
> > the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems too
> > small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is
> typically
> > not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus
> > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a
> > modifying factor.)
> >
> > The vote will run until Friday Nov 9th at 6:00 am EST
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Carin
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Separating PMC and Committership

Posted by Sebastian <ss...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)

On 05.11.18 11:29, Carin Meier wrote:
> This is a procedural vote on whether to separate the committer and PPMC
> levels in the project. The current state is that a user is considered as
> both a committer and a PPMC member at the same time. This vote is to change
> that to be able to invite a person in as a committer separately from a PPMC
> member.
> 
> Document reference:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member
> 
> Discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9c6ecda02e081aa6b689c92badc9dcf05ced6fb3691fd370471773d1@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> 
> The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> 
> Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule unless
> otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than
> unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- regardless of
> the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems too
> small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is typically
> not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus
> <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a
> modifying factor.)
> 
> The vote will run until Friday Nov 9th at 6:00 am EST
> 
> Thanks,
> Carin
>