RE: [PATCH] Improvement 5299 - Add append and timeout option to t he java task

[th...@ascentialsoftware.com]

I did not know about the patch submission through bugzilla. I will look at
that.
I will try to add some tests/examples over the weekend.

Thomas

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:steve_l@iseran.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:26 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improvement 5299 - Add append and timeout option to
the java task


I am reasonably happy with these. They do make things more consistent
between exec and java. I'd make two changes to the docs, which are easily
done
 a) mention that timeout only matters in a new JVM
 b) add some examples
...then add the stuff in ExecuteTask to note timeouts and print them.

I can do these before commiting the changes. Some tests would be nice too,
but I could use some help there.

What does everyone else think?

-steve

ps, thomas, you know you can add the patch into the bugzilla archive as an
alternate submission mechanism?

----- Original Message -----
From: <th...@ascentialsoftware.com>
To: <an...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 6:44 PM
Subject: [PATCH] Improvement 5299 - Add append and timeout option to the
java task


> I just created the improvement in Apache Bug Database.
> There is the proposed patch to fix it.
>
> Add an append attribute and timeout attribute to the java command.
> append to add to output file if specified.
> timeout to stop the command if running for too long.
>
> Java.java modified as well as java.html (corresponding documentation).
>
> Thomas
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>