You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2006/09/11 08:53:13 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40458] - difference between xsl used for FOP Verison 0.20.5 and 0.92(beta)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458


jeremias@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




------- Additional Comments From jeremias@apache.org  2006-09-11 06:53 -------
If you have a question on Apache FOP please post that on the fop-users mailing
list [1]. Bugzilla is for bugs and keeping track of work items.

[1] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/maillist.html#fop-user

FOP 0.20.5 did many things wrong which FOP 0.92beta does much better. So if the
XSL-FO you generated for 0.20.5 doesn't work in 0.92beta it means your FO was
wrong and has to be improved. Details what needs to be changed can be found under:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.92/upgrading.html
If this information doesn't help, please post log output and possibly an FO file
(not XSLT!) to the fop-users mailing list so people can give you some hints.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.