You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Cliff Woolley <jw...@virginia.edu> on 2001/11/09 01:57:07 UTC
RE: 2.0.28
I did some testing on 2.0.28:
Can you bump the tag on httpd.conf to get the revert of that BeOS IfModule
thing of David's (very important)? Can you also bump the tag on
mod_headers.c to include the fix for the (new within the last day)
constness compiler warning I just committed (not critical)?
Other than that,
+1 for BSD/OS+prefork
tested with ./ab -n 10000 -c 10 -k .../manual/index.html.en
+1 for Solaris 2.6+worker
tested only to compile
+1 for Linux 2.4.13+worker (Slackware 8)
+1 for Linux 2.4.3+worker (RH7.1)
tested with httpd-test HEAD, failed some tests:
Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of failed
-------------------------------------------------------------
apache/limits.t 10 2 20.00% 7, 9
I don't consider this one a showstopper, since it's an issue
under active discussion on the mailing list
modules/cgi.t 36 33 91.67% 1-4, 6, 8-27, 29-36
ssl/env.t 22 16 72.73% 1-5, 12-22
Do these look normal? They've been failing for quite a while
now and nobody else that I know of except Aaron seems to have
noticed.
Can't test with httpd-test on Solaris 2.6 because of the following, which
has also been there for ages:
jcw5q@cobra:/uf2/jcw5q/apache/httpd-test/perl-framework$ t/TEST
setting ulimit to allow core files
ulimit -c unlimited
exec t/TEST
/bin/sh: ulimit: bad ulimit
Config used:
--enable-modules=most
--enable-file-cache
--enable-so
--enable-case-filter
--enable-case-filter-in
--enable-proxy
--enable-ssl
--with-mpm=worker
--enable-maintainer-mode
--Cliff
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cliff Woolley
cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
Charlottesville, VA
Re: 2.0.28
Posted by Greg Ames <gr...@remulak.net>.
Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> I did some testing on 2.0.28:
>
> Can you bump the tag on httpd.conf to get the revert of that BeOS IfModule
> thing of David's (very important)?
done.
> Can you also bump the tag on
> mod_headers.c to include the fix for the (new within the last day)
> constness compiler warning I just committed (not critical)?
normally I would resist sliding in something that's not that important.
But you went way beyond the call of duty with your testing of the
preliminary tarball, not to mention recently slaying the dragon of
BSD/OS make, so I bumped this one too.
Greg
Re: 2.0.28
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> tested with httpd-test HEAD, failed some tests:
> Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of failed
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> apache/limits.t 10 2 20.00% 7, 9
> I don't consider this one a showstopper, since it's an issue
> under active discussion on the mailing list
Run this with "t/TEST -v apache/limits" and it will tell you
what it's trying to do with those tests. If you're using a
recent checkout, and LWP 5.60 or later, tests 7 and 9 are
sending a GET request with a chunked body. Test 7 sends a
small body, and 9 sends a large one (larger than LimitRequestBody
bytes).
--
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"All right everyone! Step away from the glowing hamburger!"
Re: 2.0.28
Posted by Cliff Woolley <cl...@yahoo.com>.
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > modules/cgi.t 36 33 91.67% 1-4, 6, 8-27, 29-36
> > ssl/env.t 22 16 72.73% 1-5, 12-22
> > Do these look normal? They've been failing for quite a while
> > now and nobody else that I know of except Aaron seems to have
> > noticed.
>
> Those two seem to be related to a stale httpd-test build. Usually a
> fresh checkout seem to make it work. But, I'll try to check again
> later this weekend. -- justin
Ah, that's one thing I didn't try... I'll re-check-out and see what
happens.
--Cliff
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cliff Woolley
cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
Charlottesville, VA
Re: 2.0.28
Posted by Cliff Woolley <cl...@yahoo.com>.
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > modules/cgi.t 36 33 91.67% 1-4, 6, 8-27, 29-36
> > ssl/env.t 22 16 72.73% 1-5, 12-22
> > Do these look normal? They've been failing for quite a while
> > now and nobody else that I know of except Aaron seems to have
> > noticed.
>
> Those two seem to be related to a stale httpd-test build. Usually a
> fresh checkout seem to make it work. But, I'll try to check again
> later this weekend. -- justin
FYI, I did a fresh checkout on one of my boxes and it didn't help. I'll
try it on the other one later today.
--Cliff
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cliff Woolley
cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
Charlottesville, VA
Re: 2.0.28
Posted by Cliff Woolley <cl...@yahoo.com>.
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > modules/cgi.t 36 33 91.67% 1-4, 6, 8-27, 29-36
> > ssl/env.t 22 16 72.73% 1-5, 12-22
> > Do these look normal? They've been failing for quite a while
> > now and nobody else that I know of except Aaron seems to have
> > noticed.
>
> Those two seem to be related to a stale httpd-test build. Usually a
> fresh checkout seem to make it work. But, I'll try to check again
> later this weekend. -- justin
Ah, that's one thing I didn't try... I'll re-check-out and see what
happens.
--Cliff
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cliff Woolley
cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
Charlottesville, VA
Re: 2.0.28
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@ebuilt.com>.
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 07:57:07PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> Can you bump the tag on httpd.conf to get the revert of that BeOS IfModule
> thing of David's (very important)? Can you also bump the tag on
+1.
> tested with httpd-test HEAD, failed some tests:
> Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of failed
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> apache/limits.t 10 2 20.00% 7, 9
> I don't consider this one a showstopper, since it's an issue
> under active discussion on the mailing list
> modules/cgi.t 36 33 91.67% 1-4, 6, 8-27, 29-36
> ssl/env.t 22 16 72.73% 1-5, 12-22
> Do these look normal? They've been failing for quite a while
> now and nobody else that I know of except Aaron seems to have
> noticed.
Those two seem to be related to a stale httpd-test build. Usually a
fresh checkout seem to make it work. But, I'll try to check again
later this weekend. -- justin
Re: 2.0.28
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@ebuilt.com>.
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 07:57:07PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> Can you bump the tag on httpd.conf to get the revert of that BeOS IfModule
> thing of David's (very important)? Can you also bump the tag on
+1.
> tested with httpd-test HEAD, failed some tests:
> Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of failed
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> apache/limits.t 10 2 20.00% 7, 9
> I don't consider this one a showstopper, since it's an issue
> under active discussion on the mailing list
> modules/cgi.t 36 33 91.67% 1-4, 6, 8-27, 29-36
> ssl/env.t 22 16 72.73% 1-5, 12-22
> Do these look normal? They've been failing for quite a while
> now and nobody else that I know of except Aaron seems to have
> noticed.
Those two seem to be related to a stale httpd-test build. Usually a
fresh checkout seem to make it work. But, I'll try to check again
later this weekend. -- justin