You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to modperl@perl.apache.org by Ask Bjoern Hansen <as...@perl.org> on 2002/01/01 18:32:53 UTC
Re: mod_perl site challenge: proposal to use ASF site design (fwd)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 14:30:24 -0800 (PST)
From: kkeller@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
To: modperl@apache.org
Subject: Re: mod_perl site challenge: proposal to use ASF site design
David wrote:
> (a) See if others also think that the three alternatives for a mod_perl site
> are not very desirable. If you agree, please speak up and say that you
> agree.
I don't have a strong opinion.
> (b) See if others also think that using the ASF generic site design (even
> though it's not "cool and distinctive") would be a good idea. If you agree,
> please speak up and say that you agree.
I agree that using the ASF generic site is a good idea. And why not?
mod_perl is so closely integrated with Apache, why shouldn't mod_perl's
website at least adapt the Apache website look and feel?
> Also, lets keep in mind something that Stas pointed out to me: most anything
> is a step up from our existing site design. So, if we go with one of the
> three existing options it's still a step up.
That's for sure! :)
-- keith
kkeller@speakeasy.net
public key: http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/kkeller/public_key
alt.os.linux.slackware FAQ: http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/perl/fom