[jira] [Closed] (LEGAL-287) Legal review of Apache Maturity Model

["Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Henri Yandell closed LEGAL-287.
-------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Fix

> Legal review of Apache Maturity Model
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-287
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-287
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: John D. Ament
>
> I'd like to ask the legal team to review the maturity model - http://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html
> There are some clauses that don't sound quite right, either they don't align to the existing foundation policies or seem to mis-state them.
> CD30 - Does this preclude that the tooling required to build cannot be distributed with the package? What about projects that require lua or other interpreted language (e.g. not compiled).
> LC30 and LC20 seem to duplicate each other
> LC50 - I'm not sure what copyright has to do here.  Its been discussed that copyright != licensing.  The SGA is a license to use code under Apache v2 license.  Copyright claims may be added to NOTICES in accordance with that.
> RE40 - Seems to imply that convenience binaries are expected.
> RE50 - While a good idea, seems to be a subtle foundation policy change.
> QU* - All seem to be new policy.  Specifically, security is more of a foundation-wide requirement with foundation-wide rules for handling.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org