Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

[Chip Senkbeil <ch...@gmail.com>]

Closing this vote. Going to start a vote for an RC4 once I get all of the
artifacts in place on staging and dist.

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:59 AM Gino Bustelo <gi...@bustelos.com> wrote:

> Go for it Chip.
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:21 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I would check with Gino if he is ok with somebody else continuing this,
> but
> > if you know he is way or something, then it should be ok for you to
> > continue,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Chip Senkbeil <ch...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Does Gino need to be the one to do this? Or can I get it started by
> > closing
> > > the vote thread and opening an approval request in general for the
> > release?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 5:30 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I haven't seen an e-mail closing the release vote, and neither the
> IPMC
> > > > vote thread started. Are we still waiting for something specific
> here ?
> > > > Anything one of the mentors can help ?
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Luciano Resende <
> luckbr1975@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > First you need to close the vote. Then the release needs to be
> > approved
> > > > in
> > > > > general, check the archives there for an example of the vote
> thread,
> > as
> > > > you
> > > > > need to add link to vote thread, cote result....
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:03 PM Chip Senkbeil <
> > chip.senkbeil@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> So, with three +1s, what do we need to do? Are there still things
> to
> > > > >> address? Does this need to go to general Apache? This has been
> open
> > > for
> > > > >> awhile.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM Gino Bustelo <gi...@bustelos.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > +1
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > We need to get this thing moving.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:17 PM Hitesh Shah <hi...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Sorry for the delay in reviewing the bits.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Comments:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > KEYS file still missing.
> > > > >> > > Did signature/checksum checks for binary, source and pip
> > bundles.
> > > > >> > > For the binary release, the assembly jar makes it a bit tough
> to
> > > > >> validate
> > > > >> > > all dependencies. Not completed this fully though. Would be
> good
> > > if
> > > > >> other
> > > > >> > > folks who are reviewing can help.
> > > > >> > > For source release, there are a bunch of files without valid
> > > > headers.
> > > > >> > Also
> > > > >> > > some files like .example-image, etc are part of the release
> > > tarball
> > > > >> when
> > > > >> > > they should not be. ( used `find . -type f | xargs grep -L
> > > "Licensed
> > > > >> to
> > > > >> > the
> > > > >> > > Apache Software”` to find the ones in question). These should
> be
> > > > fixed
> > > > >> > > before the next release.
> > > > >> > > The License/Notice file for the source bundle needs to be
> fixed.
> > > > They
> > > > >> > > contain entries for items that are not part of the source
> > bundle.
> > > > >> > > PKG-INFO for the pip package may need to be fixed. The license
> > for
> > > > it
> > > > >> is
> > > > >> > > not only ALv2 but a combination of all the other bits bundled
> > into
> > > > the
> > > > >> > > assembly jar.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > License/Notice files:
> > > > >> > > There are a bunch of copyright lines in the LICENSE file
> without
> > > any
> > > > >> > > indication of why they are there. At the moment, it seems to
> > > > indicate
> > > > >> > they
> > > > >> > > are for all of the toree codebase.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > +0 for this release.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > I think that there has been enough work done on this initial
> > > release
> > > > >> that
> > > > >> > > it will be useful to get some more eyes from the larger
> > Incubator
> > > > >> group
> > > > >> > to
> > > > >> > > provide more useful feedback.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Please note that this vote does need atleast 3 PPMC +1s to
> pass.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > thanks
> > > > >> > > — Hitesh
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > On Oct 27, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Gino Bustelo <
> gino@bustelos.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Please vote to approve the release of the following
> candidate
> > as
> > > > >> > > > Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the
> > LICENSE
> > > > and
> > > > >> > > > NOTICE files since this is our first release.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3
> > > > >> > > > (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d)
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > *
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/
> > > > >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > > > >> > > > <
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/
> > > > >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > > > >> > > >*
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests,
> etc.
> > > can
> > > > >> be
> > > > >> > > found at:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > *
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> > > > >> > > > <
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> > > > >> >*
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a
> > majority
> > > of
> > > > >> at
> > > > >> > > least
> > > > >> > > > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0
> > > > >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sent from my Mobile device
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>