[Bug 6613] SORBS DNSBL - Result codes ending .11 and .12

[bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org]

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6613

Darxus <Da...@ChaosReigns.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |Darxus@ChaosReigns.com

--- Comment #1 from Darxus <Da...@ChaosReigns.com> 2011-06-03 18:41:37 UTC ---
http://www.sorbs.net/using.shtml

That is kind of unclear, but rhsbl.sorbs.net is for querying hostnames, and
dnsbl.sorbs.net is for IPs, so we're not already querying a zone containing
this data.  But these should at least be added to somebody's sandbox for
evaluation.

I believe the rules should be:

header   __FROM_SORBS_RHSBL  eval:check_rbl_envfrom('sorbs_rhsbl',
'rhsbl.sorbs.net.')
tflags   __FROM_SORBS_RHSBL  net

header   FROM_SORBS_BADCONF  eval:check_rbl_sub('sorbs_rhsbl', '127.0.0.11')
describe FROM_SORBS_BADCONF  Envelope sender is in badconf.rhsbl.sorbs.net
tflags   FROM_SORBS_BADCONF  net
score    FROM_SORBS_BADCONF  0.001

header   FROM_SORBS_NOMAIL   eval:check_rbl_sub('sorbs_rhsbl', '127.0.0.12')
describe FROM_SORBS_NOMAIL   Envelope sender is in nomail.rhsbl.sorbs.net
tflags   FROM_SORBS_NOMAIL   net
score    FROM_SORBS_NOMAIL   0.001


I have low expectations for badconf.rhsbl.sorbs.net, because it sounds possibly
identical to bogusmx.rfc-ignorant.org for which we recently killed the
DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX rule because it sucked (bug 6526).

Is this enough to get a "[review]" in this bug's summary?  Or should I create a
patch to create myself a sandbox for somebody else to commit?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.