You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com> on 2007/04/12 05:21:30 UTC
[vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
- [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
- [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
decision. So I'd like to start voting.
[ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
This vote will close 72 hours from now.
Thanks,
Stepan Mishura
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Mikhail Fursov <mi...@gmail.com>.
+1 - lets do the branch for classlib module
On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Stepan,
> I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
> +1 for that.
>
> 2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
> > +1
> >
> > -Stepan.
> >
> > On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> > > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> > > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
> > >
> > > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
> > > decision. So I'd like to start voting.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> > > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
> > >
> > > This vote will close 72 hours from now.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Stepan Mishura
> > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> > >
> >
>
--
Mikhail Fursov
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Vikram <mr...@gmail.com>.
+1 for classlib branch
On 4/13/07, Gregory Shimansky <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> >> Stepan,
> >> I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> >> i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
> >> +1 for that.
> >>
> >
> > Sorry for not being clear - yes, I meant class library branch.
>
> +1 for classlib branch.
>
> > -Stepan.
> >
> >> 2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > -Stepan.
> >> >
> >> > On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> >> > > The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> >> > > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> >> > > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
> >> > >
> >> > > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do
> final
> >> > > decision. So I'd like to start voting.
> >> > >
> >> > > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> >> > > [ ] 0 No opinion
> >> > > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
> >> > >
> >> > > This vote will close 72 hours from now.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Stepan Mishura
> >> > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Gregory
>
>
--
www.FaeLLe.com
www.VikramMohan.com
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Gregory Shimansky <gs...@gmail.com>.
Stepan Mishura wrote:
> On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
>> Stepan,
>> I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
>> i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
>> +1 for that.
>>
>
> Sorry for not being clear - yes, I meant class library branch.
+1 for classlib branch.
> -Stepan.
>
>> 2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
>> > +1
>> >
>> > -Stepan.
>> >
>> > On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
>> > > The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
>> > > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
>> > > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
>> > >
>> > > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
>> > > decision. So I'd like to start voting.
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
>> > > [ ] 0 No opinion
>> > > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
>> > >
>> > > This vote will close 72 hours from now.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Stepan Mishura
>> > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
--
Gregory
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Egor Pasko <eg...@gmail.com>.
On the 0x2B6 day of Apache Harmony Stepan Mishura wrote:
> On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> > Stepan,
> > I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> > i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
> > +1 for that.
> >
>
> Sorry for not being clear - yes, I meant class library branch.
+1 for pilot classlib branch
> -Stepan.
>
> > 2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > -Stepan.
> > >
> > > On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > > The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> > > > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> > > > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
> > > >
> > > > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
> > > > decision. So I'd like to start voting.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> > > > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
> > > >
> > > > This vote will close 72 hours from now.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Stepan Mishura
> > > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Egor Pasko
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Rui Hu <ro...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 4/12/07, Leo Li <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 4/12/07, Xiao-Feng Li <xi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> > > > Stepan,
> > > > I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> > > > i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
> > > > +1 for that.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Sorry for not being clear - yes, I meant class library branch.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > from xiaofeng
> >
> > > -Stepan.
> > >
> > > > 2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > -Stepan.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > > > > The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> > > > > > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> > > > > > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do
> > final
> > > > > > decision. So I'd like to start voting.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> > > > > > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This vote will close 72 hours from now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Stepan Mishura
> > > > > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Leo Li
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
--
Robert Hu
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Leo Li <li...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 4/12/07, Xiao-Feng Li <xi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> > > Stepan,
> > > I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> > > i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
> > > +1 for that.
> > >
> >
> > Sorry for not being clear - yes, I meant class library branch.
>
> +1
>
> from xiaofeng
>
> > -Stepan.
> >
> > > 2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > -Stepan.
> > > >
> > > > On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > > > The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> > > > > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> > > > > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
> > > > >
> > > > > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do
> final
> > > > > decision. So I'd like to start voting.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> > > > > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will close 72 hours from now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Stepan Mishura
> > > > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
>
--
Leo Li
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Xiao-Feng Li <xi...@gmail.com>.
On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> > Stepan,
> > I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> > i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
> > +1 for that.
> >
>
> Sorry for not being clear - yes, I meant class library branch.
+1
from xiaofeng
> -Stepan.
>
> > 2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > -Stepan.
> > >
> > > On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > > The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> > > > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> > > > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
> > > >
> > > > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
> > > > decision. So I'd like to start voting.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> > > > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
> > > >
> > > > This vote will close 72 hours from now.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Stepan Mishura
> > > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Sian January <si...@googlemail.com>.
+1
On 12/04/07, Mikhail Loenko <ml...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 for classlib branch
>
> 2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
> > On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> > > Stepan,
> > > I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> > > i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
> > > +1 for that.
> > >
> >
> > Sorry for not being clear - yes, I meant class library branch.
> >
> > -Stepan.
> >
> > > 2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > -Stepan.
> > > >
> > > > On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > > > The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> > > > > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> > > > > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
> > > > >
> > > > > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do
> final
> > > > > decision. So I'd like to start voting.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> > > > > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will close 72 hours from now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Stepan Mishura
> > > > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Mikhail Loenko <ml...@gmail.com>.
+1 for classlib branch
2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
> On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> > Stepan,
> > I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> > i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
> > +1 for that.
> >
>
> Sorry for not being clear - yes, I meant class library branch.
>
> -Stepan.
>
> > 2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > -Stepan.
> > >
> > > On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > > The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> > > > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> > > > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
> > > >
> > > > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
> > > > decision. So I'd like to start voting.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> > > > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
> > > >
> > > > This vote will close 72 hours from now.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Stepan Mishura
> > > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Sean Qiu <se...@gmail.com>.
+1
2007/4/13, Kelvin Ye <ke...@gmail.com>:
> +1 for classlib branch
>
> On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> > > Stepan,
> > > I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> > > i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
> > > +1 for that.
> > >
> >
> > Sorry for not being clear - yes, I meant class library branch.
> >
> > -Stepan.
> >
> > > 2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > -Stepan.
> > > >
> > > > On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > > > The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> > > > > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> > > > > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
> > > > >
> > > > > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
> > > > > decision. So I'd like to start voting.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> > > > > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will close 72 hours from now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Stepan Mishura
> > > > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Kelvin Ye
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
--
Sean Qiu
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Kelvin Ye <ke...@gmail.com>.
+1 for classlib branch
On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> > Stepan,
> > I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> > i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
> > +1 for that.
> >
>
> Sorry for not being clear - yes, I meant class library branch.
>
> -Stepan.
>
> > 2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > -Stepan.
> > >
> > > On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > > The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> > > > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> > > > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
> > > >
> > > > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
> > > > decision. So I'd like to start voting.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> > > > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
> > > >
> > > > This vote will close 72 hours from now.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Stepan Mishura
> > > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Best Regards,
Kelvin Ye
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>.
On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> Stepan,
> I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
> +1 for that.
>
Sorry for not being clear - yes, I meant class library branch.
-Stepan.
> 2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
> > +1
> >
> > -Stepan.
> >
> > On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> > > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> > > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
> > >
> > > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
> > > decision. So I'd like to start voting.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> > > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
> > >
> > > This vote will close 72 hours from now.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Stepan Mishura
> > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> > >
> >
>
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Alexey Varlamov <al...@gmail.com>.
Stepan,
I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
+1 for that.
2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> -Stepan.
>
> On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
> >
> > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
> > decision. So I'd like to start voting.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
> >
> > This vote will close 72 hours from now.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stepan Mishura
> > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> >
>
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Tony Wu <wu...@gmail.com>.
+1 strongly
On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> -Stepan.
>
> On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
> >
> > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
> > decision. So I'd like to start voting.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
> >
> > This vote will close 72 hours from now.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stepan Mishura
> > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> >
>
--
Tony Wu
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by LvJimmy，Jing <fi...@gmail.com>.
+1 :)
2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> -Stepan.
>
> On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
> >
> > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
> > decision. So I'd like to start voting.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
> >
> > This vote will close 72 hours from now.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stepan Mishura
> > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> >
>
--
Best Regards!
Jimmy, Jing Lv
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>.
+1
-Stepan.
On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
>
> I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
> decision. So I'd like to start voting.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
>
> This vote will close 72 hours from now.
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan Mishura
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org>.
On 4/17/07, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/17/07, Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On 4/16/07, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 4/17/07, Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > On 4/16/07, Spark Shen <sm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > +1.
> > > > >
> > > > > But I have a question. Which tag should be use to check out concurrent code
> > > > > for 1.6?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > That's only partially true; there are some minor changes that have
> > > > been made on top of that code, as the code behind that tag has some
> > > > compile errors.
> > > >
> > > > > Current concurrent code used for 1.5 is using URL:
> > > > > http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/?only_with_tag=JSR166_PFD
> > > > > That is tag only_with_tag=JSR166_PFD.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/ seems oak. Your
> > > > > opinion?
> > > >
> > > > We'd likely just take the trunk and see how it compares with JAPI
> > > > reports against Java 6 RI. Are the JAPI reports still being run?
> > > >
> > >
> > > My understanding is that in the classlib's branch we can use 1.5 for
> > > concurrent code and take concurrent trunk into classlib's branch
> > > latter. Correct?
> >
> > I presume you mean that after the Java 5 is tagged and the trunk
> > becomes the Java 6/latest branch again, then yes, we can pull in the
> > latest copy of the concurrent code there.
> >
> > Keep in mind, we do have to grab a copy of the code and check it into
> > SVN. Since it's public domain code, we keep it in the 'standard'
> > folder and pull it into classlib via an svn:externals link.
> >
>
> To be clear - I meant after taking concurrent trunk we'll have the following:
> classlib
> trunk
> modules/concurrent
> ---> standart/classlib/trunk/modules/concurrent (1.5)
> branches
> java6-branch
> modules/concurrent
> --->
> standart/classlib/branches/java6-branch/modules/concurrent (1.6)
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan.
We could do that, but it would be just as easy to set the external
link in trunk to a specific revision number and then check in the
latest concurrent code to standard and point the java6 branch to the
newer revision.
-Nathan
>
>
> > -Nathan
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Stepan.
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Spark Shen
> > > > > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>.
On 4/17/07, Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 4/16/07, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 4/17/07, Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > On 4/16/07, Spark Shen <sm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > +1.
> > > >
> > > > But I have a question. Which tag should be use to check out concurrent code
> > > > for 1.6?
> > > >
> > >
> > > That's only partially true; there are some minor changes that have
> > > been made on top of that code, as the code behind that tag has some
> > > compile errors.
> > >
> > > > Current concurrent code used for 1.5 is using URL:
> > > > http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/?only_with_tag=JSR166_PFD
> > > > That is tag only_with_tag=JSR166_PFD.
> > > >
> > > > http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/ seems oak. Your
> > > > opinion?
> > >
> > > We'd likely just take the trunk and see how it compares with JAPI
> > > reports against Java 6 RI. Are the JAPI reports still being run?
> > >
> >
> > My understanding is that in the classlib's branch we can use 1.5 for
> > concurrent code and take concurrent trunk into classlib's branch
> > latter. Correct?
>
> I presume you mean that after the Java 5 is tagged and the trunk
> becomes the Java 6/latest branch again, then yes, we can pull in the
> latest copy of the concurrent code there.
>
> Keep in mind, we do have to grab a copy of the code and check it into
> SVN. Since it's public domain code, we keep it in the 'standard'
> folder and pull it into classlib via an svn:externals link.
>
To be clear - I meant after taking concurrent trunk we'll have the following:
classlib
trunk
modules/concurrent
---> standart/classlib/trunk/modules/concurrent (1.5)
branches
java6-branch
modules/concurrent
--->
standart/classlib/branches/java6-branch/modules/concurrent (1.6)
Thanks,
Stepan.
> -Nathan
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stepan.
> >
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Spark Shen
> > > > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org>.
On 4/16/07, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/17/07, Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On 4/16/07, Spark Shen <sm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1.
> > >
> > > But I have a question. Which tag should be use to check out concurrent code
> > > for 1.6?
> > >
> >
> > That's only partially true; there are some minor changes that have
> > been made on top of that code, as the code behind that tag has some
> > compile errors.
> >
> > > Current concurrent code used for 1.5 is using URL:
> > > http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/?only_with_tag=JSR166_PFD
> > > That is tag only_with_tag=JSR166_PFD.
> > >
> > > http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/ seems oak. Your
> > > opinion?
> >
> > We'd likely just take the trunk and see how it compares with JAPI
> > reports against Java 6 RI. Are the JAPI reports still being run?
> >
>
> My understanding is that in the classlib's branch we can use 1.5 for
> concurrent code and take concurrent trunk into classlib's branch
> latter. Correct?
I presume you mean that after the Java 5 is tagged and the trunk
becomes the Java 6/latest branch again, then yes, we can pull in the
latest copy of the concurrent code there.
Keep in mind, we do have to grab a copy of the code and check it into
SVN. Since it's public domain code, we keep it in the 'standard'
folder and pull it into classlib via an svn:externals link.
-Nathan
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan.
>
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > >
> > > --
> > > Spark Shen
> > > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> > >
> >
>
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>.
On 4/17/07, Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 4/16/07, Spark Shen <sm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1.
> >
> > But I have a question. Which tag should be use to check out concurrent code
> > for 1.6?
> >
>
> That's only partially true; there are some minor changes that have
> been made on top of that code, as the code behind that tag has some
> compile errors.
>
> > Current concurrent code used for 1.5 is using URL:
> > http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/?only_with_tag=JSR166_PFD
> > That is tag only_with_tag=JSR166_PFD.
> >
> > http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/ seems oak. Your
> > opinion?
>
> We'd likely just take the trunk and see how it compares with JAPI
> reports against Java 6 RI. Are the JAPI reports still being run?
>
My understanding is that in the classlib's branch we can use 1.5 for
concurrent code and take concurrent trunk into classlib's branch
latter. Correct?
Thanks,
Stepan.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > --
> > Spark Shen
> > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> >
>
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org>.
On 4/16/07, Spark Shen <sm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1.
>
> But I have a question. Which tag should be use to check out concurrent code
> for 1.6?
>
That's only partially true; there are some minor changes that have
been made on top of that code, as the code behind that tag has some
compile errors.
> Current concurrent code used for 1.5 is using URL:
> http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/?only_with_tag=JSR166_PFD
> That is tag only_with_tag=JSR166_PFD.
>
> http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/ seems oak. Your
> opinion?
We'd likely just take the trunk and see how it compares with JAPI
reports against Java 6 RI. Are the JAPI reports still being run?
>
> Best regards
>
> --
> Spark Shen
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Spark Shen <sm...@gmail.com>.
+1.
But I have a question. Which tag should be use to check out concurrent code
for 1.6?
Current concurrent code used for 1.5 is using URL:
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/?only_with_tag=JSR166_PFD
That is tag only_with_tag=JSR166_PFD.
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/ seems oak. Your
opinion?
Best regards
--
Spark Shen
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Alexey Petrenko <al...@gmail.com>.
+1
2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
> The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
>
> I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
> decision. So I'd like to start voting.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
>
> This vote will close 72 hours from now.
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan Mishura
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Oliver Deakin <ol...@googlemail.com>.
+1 for classlib branch.
Stepan Mishura wrote:
> The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
>
> I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
> decision. So I'd like to start voting.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
>
> This vote will close 72 hours from now.
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan Mishura
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>
--
Oliver Deakin
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Ruth Cao <ru...@gmail.com>.
+1
Stepan Mishura wrote:
> The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
>
> I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
> decision. So I'd like to start voting.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
>
> This vote will close 72 hours from now.
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan Mishura
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>
--
Regards,
Ruth Cao
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
Posted by Yang Paulex <pa...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me
2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <st...@gmail.com>:
>
> The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
>
> I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
> decision. So I'd like to start voting.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
>
> This vote will close 72 hours from now.
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan Mishura
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>
--
Paulex Yang
China Software Development laboratory
IBM