You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Sidney Markowitz <si...@sidney.com> on 2006/10/16 02:43:16 UTC

Re: svn commit: r464144 - /spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list

How did a meta rule get promoted without the rule it depends on?

jm@apache.org wrote, On 15/10/06 9:53 PM:
> Modified: spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?view=diff&rev=464144&r1=464143&r2=464144
> ==============================================================================
> --- spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list (original)
> +++ spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list Sun Oct 15 01:53:50 2006
[...]
>  # good enough
> -HS_INDEX_PARAM
> +HS_MEETUP_FOR_SEX
>  
>  # good enough
> -HS_MEETUP_FOR_SEX
> +HS_PHARMA_1

resulting meta.t test error:

meta test HS_PHARMA_1 has undefined dependency 'HS_INDEX_PARAM'


   -- sidney