You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> on 2007/08/01 07:46:23 UTC
[VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)
Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0)
and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then.
Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to
hopefully facilitate wider testing for 1.8.0.
Release Notes:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Release Artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/
Docs:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/site/
RAT Report:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/rat.txt
CLIRR Report:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/clirr.txt
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
Niall
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me btw
Niall
On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0)
> and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then.
> Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to
> hopefully facilitate wider testing for 1.8.0.
>
> Release Notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> Release Artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/
>
> Docs:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/site/
>
> RAT Report:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/rat.txt
>
> CLIRR Report:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/clirr.txt
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Niall
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On 8/1/07, Dion Gillard <di...@trongus.com> wrote:
> I'm +1.
>
> WRT the RAT report, is there a reason we don't include the ASL header?
Its not part of the distro - I just ran it from the command line for
anyone reviewing the RC (same with clirr report).
Niall
> On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0)
> > and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then.
> > Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to
> > hopefully facilitate wider testing for 1.8.0.
> >
> > Release Notes:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> >
> > Release Artifacts:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/
> >
> > Docs:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/site/
> >
> > RAT Report:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/rat.txt
> >
> > CLIRR Report:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/clirr.txt
> >
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] -1
> >
> > Niall
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> dIon Gillard
> Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)
Posted by Dion Gillard <di...@trongus.com>.
I'm +1.
WRT the RAT report, is there a reason we don't include the ASL header?
On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0)
> and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then.
> Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to
> hopefully facilitate wider testing for 1.8.0.
>
> Release Notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> Release Artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/
>
> Docs:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/site/
>
> RAT Report:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/rat.txt
>
> CLIRR Report:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/clirr.txt
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Niall
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
dIon Gillard
Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit.
[RESULT][VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
This vote has passed with six +1 votes (all binding) from the following people:
Henri Yandell
Dion Gillard
Niall Pemberton
Oliver Heger
Jörg Schaible
Rahul Akolkar
Thanks to everyone who tested/voted. I'll complete the release process
this weekend.
Niall
On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0)
> and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then.
> Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to
> hopefully facilitate wider testing for 1.8.0.
>
> Release Notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> Release Artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/
>
> Docs:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/site/
>
> RAT Report:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/rat.txt
>
> CLIRR Report:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/clirr.txt
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Niall
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
All looks good. +1
Oliver
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0)
> and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then.
> Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to
> hopefully facilitate wider testing for 1.8.0.
>
> Release Notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> Release Artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/
>
> Docs:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/site/
>
> RAT Report:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/rat.txt
>
> CLIRR Report:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/clirr.txt
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Niall
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)
Posted by Jörg Schaible <Jo...@Elsag-Solutions.com>.
Hi Niall,
Niall Pemberton wrote on Friday, August 03, 2007 3:52 AM:
[snip]
>>> Since the test implies some nasty error condition (I did not have a
>>> look at the code yet), it might simply reveal some error of the JDK
>>> (especially since IBM JDK 1.4.2 works) ...
>>
>> BeanUtils has "per ClassLoader" caches
> (ContextClassLoaderLocal) which
>> uses a WeakHashMap to store references to each ClassLoader's cache.
>> The Beanification tests failing are basically trying to force garbage
>> collection by allocating ever increasing amounts (to the power of 2)
>> of spurious memory and calling System.gc() - to verify that these
>> references are released.
Hehehe. Just by looking at the name of the test, I had something like this in my mind.
>> Personally I think the test is flawed - iterating around allocating
>> an array, doubling in size each time - since by the 20th iteration
>> its allocating 1MB and by the 30th iteration 1GB. Clearly in this
>> case it blew the memory first - but I don't think that really proves
>> anything since theres no way of knowing whether the JVM either:
>> - couldn't garbage collect the reference for some reason (aim of
>> the test)
>> - didn't try to garbage collect before running out of memory
Yep. Some alternate strategies for this would be good.
>> Since it is woking on other JDKs then (i.e. seems to be forcing
>> garbage collection of those weak references) then I think its not a
>> big issue. We should probably look at improving the test - but I'm
>> not sure how - on the Sun JDK 1.5 its only allocating a few bytes (1
>> or 2 iterations) before the garnage collector runs.
>
> btw this behaviour (and test) is pretty much unchanged since the
> 1.7.0 release.
I bet, noone tried to run the tests on all those JDK's ... ;-)
However, I also don't think this problem is something that should prevent the release.
So +1 from me.
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On 8/3/07, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/2/07, Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi Niall,
> >
> > I downloaded the source tar ball and build it from scratch with M2 on Linux
> > using my compiler zoo.
> >
> > One note in advance: There's a lot of logging at the console along with
> > quite some printed stack traces. However, for most of my JDK's (Blackdown
> > 1.4.2.03, IDM JDK 1.4.2.9, JRockit 1.4.2.14, JRockit 1.5.0.11, Sun JDK
> > 1.4.2.15, Sun JDK 1.5.0.12, Sun JDK 1.6.0.02) the test succeed with no
> > problems.
>
> Hi Jörg, first thanks for going to so much trouble in testing this on
> all those JDKs - much appreciated.
>
>
> > Not so for IMB JDK 1.5.0.5:
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Test set: org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanificationTestCase
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.25 sec <<<
> > FAILURE!
> > testMemoryLeak2(org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanificationTestCase) Time
> > elapsed: 2.361 sec <<< ERROR!
> > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
> > at org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanificationTestCase.testMemoryLeak
> > (BeanificationTestCase.java:171)
> > at org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanificationTestCase.testMemoryLeak
> > (BeanificationTestCase.java:171)
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Test set: org.apache.commons.beanutils.locale.LocaleBeanificationTestCase
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.719 sec
> > <<< FAILURE!
> > testMemoryLeak
> > (org.apache.commons.beanutils.locale.LocaleBeanificationTestCase) Time
> > elapsed: 2.48 sec <<< ERROR!
> > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
> > at
> > org.apache.commons.beanutils.locale.LocaleBeanificationTestCase.testMemoryLeak
> > (LocaleBeanificationTestCase.java:182)
> > at
> > org.apache.commons.beanutils.locale.LocaleBeanificationTestCase.testMemoryLeak
> > (LocaleBeanificationTestCase.java:182)
> >
> >
> > Since the test implies some nasty error condition (I did not have a look at
> > the code yet), it might simply reveal some error of the JDK (especially
> > since IBM JDK 1.4.2 works) ...
>
> BeanUtils has "per ClassLoader" caches (ContextClassLoaderLocal) which
> uses a WeakHashMap to store references to each ClassLoader's cache.
> The Beanification tests failing are basically trying to force garbage
> collection by allocating ever increasing amounts (to the power of 2)
> of spurious memory and calling System.gc() - to verify that these
> references are released.
>
> Personally I think the test is flawed - iterating around allocating an
> array, doubling in size each time - since by the 20th iteration its
> allocating 1MB and by the 30th iteration 1GB. Clearly in this case it
> blew the memory first - but I don't think that really proves anything
> since theres no way of knowing whether the JVM either:
> - couldn't garbage collect the reference for some reason (aim of the test)
> - didn't try to garbage collect before running out of memory
>
> Since it is woking on other JDKs then (i.e. seems to be forcing
> garbage collection of those weak references) then I think its not a
> big issue. We should probably look at improving the test - but I'm not
> sure how - on the Sun JDK 1.5 its only allocating a few bytes (1 or 2
> iterations) before the garnage collector runs.
btw this behaviour (and test) is pretty much unchanged since the 1.7.0 release.
Niall
> Niall
>
> > - Jörg
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On 8/2/07, Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Niall,
>
> I downloaded the source tar ball and build it from scratch with M2 on Linux
> using my compiler zoo.
>
> One note in advance: There's a lot of logging at the console along with
> quite some printed stack traces. However, for most of my JDK's (Blackdown
> 1.4.2.03, IDM JDK 1.4.2.9, JRockit 1.4.2.14, JRockit 1.5.0.11, Sun JDK
> 1.4.2.15, Sun JDK 1.5.0.12, Sun JDK 1.6.0.02) the test succeed with no
> problems.
Hi Jörg, first thanks for going to so much trouble in testing this on
all those JDKs - much appreciated.
> Not so for IMB JDK 1.5.0.5:
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Test set: org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanificationTestCase
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.25 sec <<<
> FAILURE!
> testMemoryLeak2(org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanificationTestCase) Time
> elapsed: 2.361 sec <<< ERROR!
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
> at org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanificationTestCase.testMemoryLeak
> (BeanificationTestCase.java:171)
> at org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanificationTestCase.testMemoryLeak
> (BeanificationTestCase.java:171)
>
> [snip]
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Test set: org.apache.commons.beanutils.locale.LocaleBeanificationTestCase
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.719 sec
> <<< FAILURE!
> testMemoryLeak
> (org.apache.commons.beanutils.locale.LocaleBeanificationTestCase) Time
> elapsed: 2.48 sec <<< ERROR!
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
> at
> org.apache.commons.beanutils.locale.LocaleBeanificationTestCase.testMemoryLeak
> (LocaleBeanificationTestCase.java:182)
> at
> org.apache.commons.beanutils.locale.LocaleBeanificationTestCase.testMemoryLeak
> (LocaleBeanificationTestCase.java:182)
>
>
> Since the test implies some nasty error condition (I did not have a look at
> the code yet), it might simply reveal some error of the JDK (especially
> since IBM JDK 1.4.2 works) ...
BeanUtils has "per ClassLoader" caches (ContextClassLoaderLocal) which
uses a WeakHashMap to store references to each ClassLoader's cache.
The Beanification tests failing are basically trying to force garbage
collection by allocating ever increasing amounts (to the power of 2)
of spurious memory and calling System.gc() - to verify that these
references are released.
Personally I think the test is flawed - iterating around allocating an
array, doubling in size each time - since by the 20th iteration its
allocating 1MB and by the 30th iteration 1GB. Clearly in this case it
blew the memory first - but I don't think that really proves anything
since theres no way of knowing whether the JVM either:
- couldn't garbage collect the reference for some reason (aim of the test)
- didn't try to garbage collect before running out of memory
Since it is woking on other JDKs then (i.e. seems to be forcing
garbage collection of those weak references) then I think its not a
big issue. We should probably look at improving the test - but I'm not
sure how - on the Sun JDK 1.5 its only allocating a few bytes (1 or 2
iterations) before the garnage collector runs.
Niall
> - Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)
Posted by Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de>.
Hi Niall,
I downloaded the source tar ball and build it from scratch with M2 on Linux
using my compiler zoo.
One note in advance: There's a lot of logging at the console along with
quite some printed stack traces. However, for most of my JDK's (Blackdown
1.4.2.03, IDM JDK 1.4.2.9, JRockit 1.4.2.14, JRockit 1.5.0.11, Sun JDK
1.4.2.15, Sun JDK 1.5.0.12, Sun JDK 1.6.0.02) the test succeed with no
problems.
Not so for IMB JDK 1.5.0.5:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test set: org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanificationTestCase
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.25 sec <<<
FAILURE!
testMemoryLeak2(org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanificationTestCase) Time
elapsed: 2.361 sec <<< ERROR!
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
at org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanificationTestCase.testMemoryLeak
(BeanificationTestCase.java:171)
at org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanificationTestCase.testMemoryLeak
(BeanificationTestCase.java:171)
[snip]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test set: org.apache.commons.beanutils.locale.LocaleBeanificationTestCase
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.719 sec
<<< FAILURE!
testMemoryLeak
(org.apache.commons.beanutils.locale.LocaleBeanificationTestCase) Time
elapsed: 2.48 sec <<< ERROR!
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
at
org.apache.commons.beanutils.locale.LocaleBeanificationTestCase.testMemoryLeak
(LocaleBeanificationTestCase.java:182)
at
org.apache.commons.beanutils.locale.LocaleBeanificationTestCase.testMemoryLeak
(LocaleBeanificationTestCase.java:182)
Since the test implies some nasty error condition (I did not have a look at
the code yet), it might simply reveal some error of the JDK (especially
since IBM JDK 1.4.2 works) ...
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0)
> and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then.
> Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to
> hopefully facilitate wider testing for 1.8.0.
>
<snip/>
>
> [X] +1
> [ ] -1
>
<snap/>
Cursory downstream testing seemed OK (digester, betwixt, scxml builds;
shale dialogs etc.) Intend to do some more before 1.8.0.
-Rahul
> Niall
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/1/07, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > All the usual tests pass (sigs, keys, maven/mvn/ant builds from src
> > zip, archive equiv). The Ant build does say the following again and
> > again:
> >
> > [copy] Warning: org/apache/commons/beanutils/expression modified
> > in the future.
> >
> > No biggy if no one else can reproduce that.
>
> I just re-ran the ant build and didn't see that at all - googling I found this:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/ant-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg09479.html
>
> so is this because I'm in a time zone ahead of you? If thats the case
> it should stop happening in a few hours.
Yeah, that's what it is. I've had it before, but brain wasn't in gear.
> > Only query would be whether we want to get BEANUTILS-91 in there
> > before releasing a beta?
>
> Its a minor issue IMO (i.e. mainly javadoc) and we shoulc move it to
> the the next version
Sounds good.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On 8/1/07, Dion Gillard <di...@trongus.com> wrote:
> +1.
>
> Lets get a release out and have a plan for the next release too.
Sounds good, do you have any suggestions? IMO it was important that
this release was compatibile for all the bugs fixed. A BeanUtils 2.0
with deprecations and copied Collections classes removed would be a
starting point (although since Digester depends on those copied
Collection classes - probably need to sort that first).
Niall
> On 8/2/07, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/1/07, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > All the usual tests pass (sigs, keys, maven/mvn/ant builds from src
> > > zip, archive equiv). The Ant build does say the following again and
> > > again:
> > >
> > > [copy] Warning: org/apache/commons/beanutils/expression modified
> > > in the future.
> > >
> > > No biggy if no one else can reproduce that.
> >
> > I just re-ran the ant build and didn't see that at all - googling I found
> > this:
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/ant-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg09479.html
> >
> > so is this because I'm in a time zone ahead of you? If thats the case
> > it should stop happening in a few hours.
> >
> > > Only query would be whether we want to get BEANUTILS-91 in there
> > > before releasing a beta?
> >
> > Its a minor issue IMO (i.e. mainly javadoc) and we shoulc move it to
> > the the next version
> >
> > Niall
> >
> > > Otherwise, +1.
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> > > On 7/31/07, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0)
> > > > and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then.
> > > > Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to
> > > > hopefully facilitate wider testing for 1.8.0.
> > > >
> > > > Release Notes:
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> > > >
> > > > Release Artifacts:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/
> > > >
> > > > Docs:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/site/
> > > >
> > > > RAT Report:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/rat.txt
> > > >
> > > > CLIRR Report:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/clirr.txt
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1
> > > > [ ] -1
> > > >
> > > > Niall
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> dIon Gillard
> Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)
Posted by Dion Gillard <di...@trongus.com>.
+1.
Lets get a release out and have a plan for the next release too.
On 8/2/07, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/1/07, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > All the usual tests pass (sigs, keys, maven/mvn/ant builds from src
> > zip, archive equiv). The Ant build does say the following again and
> > again:
> >
> > [copy] Warning: org/apache/commons/beanutils/expression modified
> > in the future.
> >
> > No biggy if no one else can reproduce that.
>
> I just re-ran the ant build and didn't see that at all - googling I found
> this:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/ant-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg09479.html
>
> so is this because I'm in a time zone ahead of you? If thats the case
> it should stop happening in a few hours.
>
> > Only query would be whether we want to get BEANUTILS-91 in there
> > before releasing a beta?
>
> Its a minor issue IMO (i.e. mainly javadoc) and we shoulc move it to
> the the next version
>
> Niall
>
> > Otherwise, +1.
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > On 7/31/07, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0)
> > > and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then.
> > > Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to
> > > hopefully facilitate wider testing for 1.8.0.
> > >
> > > Release Notes:
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> > >
> > > Release Artifacts:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/
> > >
> > > Docs:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/site/
> > >
> > > RAT Report:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/rat.txt
> > >
> > > CLIRR Report:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/clirr.txt
> > >
> > > [ ] +1
> > > [ ] -1
> > >
> > > Niall
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
dIon Gillard
Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit.
Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On 8/1/07, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All the usual tests pass (sigs, keys, maven/mvn/ant builds from src
> zip, archive equiv). The Ant build does say the following again and
> again:
>
> [copy] Warning: org/apache/commons/beanutils/expression modified
> in the future.
>
> No biggy if no one else can reproduce that.
I just re-ran the ant build and didn't see that at all - googling I found this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/ant-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg09479.html
so is this because I'm in a time zone ahead of you? If thats the case
it should stop happening in a few hours.
> Only query would be whether we want to get BEANUTILS-91 in there
> before releasing a beta?
Its a minor issue IMO (i.e. mainly javadoc) and we shoulc move it to
the the next version
Niall
> Otherwise, +1.
>
> Hen
>
> On 7/31/07, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0)
> > and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then.
> > Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to
> > hopefully facilitate wider testing for 1.8.0.
> >
> > Release Notes:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> >
> > Release Artifacts:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/
> >
> > Docs:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/site/
> >
> > RAT Report:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/rat.txt
> >
> > CLIRR Report:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/clirr.txt
> >
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] -1
> >
> > Niall
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
All the usual tests pass (sigs, keys, maven/mvn/ant builds from src
zip, archive equiv). The Ant build does say the following again and
again:
[copy] Warning: org/apache/commons/beanutils/expression modified
in the future.
No biggy if no one else can reproduce that.
Only query would be whether we want to get BEANUTILS-91 in there
before releasing a beta?
Otherwise, +1.
Hen
On 7/31/07, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0)
> and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then.
> Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to
> hopefully facilitate wider testing for 1.8.0.
>
> Release Notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> Release Artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/
>
> Docs:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/site/
>
> RAT Report:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/rat.txt
>
> CLIRR Report:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-beta/clirr.txt
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Niall
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org