Re: Proposal: C++ Language Binding for DOM Level 2 - in term of IDOM

[Andrew Snare <AS...@allshare.nl>]

Joseph Kesselman wrote:

> >It was my understanding that since the DOM interfaces are specified
> >as IDL, it was intended that implementations use the appropriate
> >CORBA language binding for implementing the DOM API.
>
>The DOM Working Group used IDL informally, as an API abstraction language.
>There was no intent that the IDL published in the DOM spec be taken
>literally as a binding in its own right.

Thank-you for clearing this up. :)

  - Andrew




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org