You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@mesos.apache.org by haosdent huang <ha...@gmail.com> on 2016/04/08 17:56:25 UTC
Re: Review Request 41665: Tests: Use 'in_memory' registry by default
for tests.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41665/#review127812
-----------------------------------------------------------
src/tests/master_tests.cpp (line 1946)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/41665/#comment191194>
Hi, @Joris. I think need update
```
MesosZooKeeperTest::CreateMasterFlags
```
as well.
- haosdent huang
On Dec. 22, 2015, 10:45 p.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41665/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Dec. 22, 2015, 10:45 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Ben Mahler, Artem Harutyunyan, and Joseph Wu.
>
>
> Bugs: MESOS-1757
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1757
>
>
> Repository: mesos
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> This speeds up running the tests by ~13%.
> It can have a much larger impact when running specific test suites
> using 'gtest_repeat'.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/tests/master_tests.cpp 865fa4a71f4bae2a218cd2c4e10873222d1ea3c4
> src/tests/mesos.cpp 11ca0519ad0dad44328b6ebdf52c5356fda818b7
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41665/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> With patch:
> ```
> Command being timed: "./bin/mesos-tests.sh"
> User time (seconds): 42.76
> System time (seconds): 10.21
> Percent of CPU this job got: 7%
> Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 11:15.21
> ```
> before:
> ```
> Command being timed: "./bin/mesos-tests.sh"
> User time (seconds): 52.58
> System time (seconds): 11.78
> Percent of CPU this job got: 8%
> Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 12:48.42
> ```
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joris Van Remoortere
>
>